What do you think of many people s criticism of Liu Cixin s Three Body Problem ?

Because in fact, when a work comes out, there will definitely be some people who like it and some people who hate it. Therefore, Liu Cixin's three-body problem is originally very popular, so there will be many people who think it is very good, and at the same time, some people will criticize it.

In my opinion, everyone has their own evaluation and thoughts about the literature. It is very normal for turnip greens to have their own love, some people criticize it, and some people like it.

How good writing do you expect a science student to be, the question is can a liberal arts student write this kind of **?

Everyone has their own opinions, some people like it, some people don't like it, it's normal, but it is undeniable that the three-body problem is a very wonderful **.

Actually, I think it's still very good overall, although it's a little immature, but it's still within the acceptable range.

In fact, it is also very understandable, everyone has their own ideas, and they also have the right to express their own ideas. There's no need to get too tangled.

Because these people think that the writing is not elegant enough, they will criticize.

It's hard to reconcile, someone likes it, there must be someone who hates it, the more popular ** people hate it (of course, there are many people who like it), people who hate this ** may not belong to the audience of this ** but they are pressed Amway, and then read this ** with colored glasses, and it is possible to become a "black fan" because they feel that the name is not worthy of the name.

As for writing or not... Look**Isn't it just a wonderful plot.,I want to read prose by looking at the writing.,Come**What kind of existence is this looking for?,( The author's character didn't find a black spot, and the work didn't have negative remarks such as plagiarism or crooked views.,People who hate "The Three-Body Problem" can only attack the writing.)

Critics don't have the IQ to look at the three-body problem at all.

It's not easy to write a book, isn't it easy to criticize a book.

Everyone's evaluation of the Three-Body Problem is very high, and they think that the Three-Body Problem is the most powerful work in Chinese science fiction.

The majority of readers have a very high evaluation of Liu Cixin's sci-fi ** "Three-Body Problem", and the whimsical ideas and novel plots attract everyone.

The majority of readers are still quite supportive of this sci-fi**, and if you think that his writing is also relatively good, he is currently going to shoot it.

It's because this ** is really well written, the rhetoric is gorgeous, but it doesn't lose its demeanor, it's not too famous, I think it's worthy of this title.

It's because this book can change the human brain and let us know about different worlds, and this book is not overpraised because it is really educational.

Hello, Three-Body Problem 4 will not be written, first of all, the earth is written to death, and the main races are written to death with no knowledge, which is generally the ending, of course, some people will say, the protagonist is not dead, and the human race still has the continuation of the starship civilization, of course, this is the reason why I think the fourth part will be written, of course, Da Liu also said that he wants to make up for the audience's expression of the dark views of the Three-Body Problem 1-3, and it is also possible to write the fourth part. But at present, the possibility of a fourth part is very small, because of the Hugo Award, because the protagonist's aura disappears, the main ethnic groups disappear, and if you continue to write, you can only write an overview of the universe and write about the starship civilization, then there is no meaning, if there are still some highlights to write about exploration, only write about the starship civilization, it will be like backwater, and you can't make any ripples! Personally, I think that at this stage, it is impossible for Da Liu to release the fourth part, because the third part will push the excitement to the highest point.

The theme of thought, as a technomaniac Liu Cixin, has destroyed the planets he writes about over and over again, and reshaped them over and over again. Humanity struggled under his gaze, trying to find the last glimmer of hope in his cold, rational mind. Liu Cixin's "Three-Body Problem" obviously punctured the warm dreams that some people are accustomed to.

Common sense and logic are either invalid or distorted and stupid in Liu Cixin's **.

"The Three-Body Problem" is a very influential science fiction book, and its origin is so macro that it makes me feel that it has broken through people's understanding, because it puts forward some very novel and profound ideas.

First of all, the Dark Forest Theory is proposed in "The Three-Body Problem", which is a theory that describes the invasion and destruction of different civilizations in the universe. This idea challenges the traditional concept of cosmic civilization alliance and mutual assistance and coexistence, and reveals the cruelty and inevitability of competition and interest competition between the universe.

Secondly, the supercomputers "Neural Network" and "Zhizi" in "The Three-Body Problem" have brought people extremely profound thinking about artificial intelligence. In **, these computing state pure machines have evolved and self-replicated, thus producing deeper understanding and judgment than human intelligence, and have become a powerful intelligent threat that is difficult to guess and deal with for mankind.

Finally, "The Three-Body Problem" has created a series of characters with distinct and tense characters, and the wonderful depictions of these characters make it a high-level literary work. In **, the character's mentality, behavior, and environment play a key role in the promotion of the storyline.

All in all, ** "The Three-Body Problem" is in the unbridled imagination of science fiction, and the hail trail book can be said to be a deep reflection on major issues such as civilization wisdom and artificial intelligence. This makes it a science fiction work with a very far-reaching impact.

It is very strange that Liu Cixin depicts the three-body world from the perspective of earthlings, such as the head of state, consuls and other political elements of the earth. The more I look at it, the more I feel that except for some special things, political class, social class, etc. are completely a copy of the earth. You can say that this is the unique charm of "The Three-Body Problem", using this setting to reflect the darkness of human nature.

But how can you guarantee that another civilization in the universe is almost identical to Earth? To put it mildly, I still think it's just a lack of imagination. Like Aunt Luo and Tuo Lao's elaborate design of the magic world, these are all products of imagination.

My favorites, Ender's Game or The Hunger Games, are all imaginative, and the space world is a great and new civilization entirely. It gives people a refreshing and refreshing feeling. But Liu Cixin doesn't seem to think much about it, just following a model that stereotypically and rigidly depicts a slightly different global society.

And the writing is not ...... enoughWell, it's not very beautiful, the writing isn't that exquisite, and it lacks Card's everybody demeanor and methodical, compelling narrative style and ability. Of course, others can say that I dare to go wild here before the smell of milk is dry, but this is indeed my heartfelt words. ps:

**It's too bad to get the name, it's so perfunctory. Ding Yi Yang Dong or something, Liu Cixin is sure that he is not writing example problems for math textbooks? A "Wang Miao" almost made me laugh

Is this gentleman suffering from a lack of water?

The biggest failure is that we still use human civilization as a starting point to define a higher-dimensional civilization. First of all, whether the civilization of high latitudes is human or not, we have no way of knowing. For example, ant civilization, how does it define human civilization?

The way of life, social system, science and technology, etc., of human beings, are not something that ants can imagine. Second, for high-latitude civilizations, wormholes, black holes, faster-than-light, etc., may only be a technology or tool that has been mastered, rather than an objective existence or inference. So, just as humans have flamethrowers and protective suits, dealing with a hornet's nest is a matter of handy, why would the Trisolarans send a few "wise sons" to the earth to disturb the basic physics of human beings and cause the collapse of human society?

If you directly destroy the ozone layer or atmosphere of the earth, you will destroy humanity. Or, move the Earth to Neptune or Venus, and the earthlings will be doomed as well. Finally, why did a high-latitude civilization conquer the civilization of the earth?

** says "for the sake of resources". The question is, why do high-latitude civilizations need the earth's resources? In case the higher-dimensional civilization is silicon-based creatures, the earth, which is suitable for carbon-based creatures, simply does not have the resources to provide silicon-based creatures.

Or maybe it's because "the side of the couch doesn't allow others to sleep soundly." Just like the wolves found around our tunzi, we must destroy the wolves to ensure the safety of tunzi. If this is the reason, then there is no earthling at all, and high-latitude civilizations will destroy humans or the earth as early as the moment the earth produces humans.

** assumes that "the Trisolarans feel that the civilization of the human beings on the earth may surpass them", so the Trisolarans have come to attack the earth. So, is it possible that a higher-dimensional civilization should destroy the three-body civilization the moment the three-body people are born? After all, the law of darkness and the law of the jungle exist objectively.

Therefore, in a series of assumptions in **, under the weaving of various physical and astronomical knowledge, we can come to such a missing conclusion: theism. It's embarrassing.

The difference between science fiction and fantasy is that the former is atheistic and the latter is theistic. Science fiction**, which tells about the "unknown", such as Atlantis, Nautilus, The Wandering Earth, etc., are all unknown existences, and there is no absolute power; And the fantasy** is set up with "absolute power" - gods, such as Rulai, Sun Wukong, Yellow Robe Monster, etc., one level downgrade, and Rulai has absolute power.

Returning to the relationship between wolves and tunzi, when human civilization evolved to the integration of communes and towns, humans began to protect wild animals in turn. When the earthlings of the "lower civilization" began to protect the "lower civilization", didn't the civilization with a higher dimension than the earthlings understand this truth? If you don't understand, shouldn't the higher-dimensional civilization be wiped out by the higher-dimensional civilization?

Just like in "The Man in Black", the vast universe we think of may be just a bell around the neck of a pet cat, and you can "play with the whole universe" as soon as you stretch out your hand, where did you come from the saying that "the Trisolarans attacked the earth after five light years"?