What do you think about canceling the criminalization of drunk driving ?

First, correctly characterize the data.

When we analyze a problem, there is a quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis is a method of analyzing the quantitative characteristics, quantitative relations and quantitative changes of social phenomena, while qualitative analysis is the judgment and confirmation of the nature of social phenomena. Numbers are cold, and if the right values are lacking, the conclusions drawn will also be cold.

The author says that about 1.44 million drunk drivers a year, and one in four people are convicted and sentenced, which is a very terrible thing. However, what he said is terrible is not the horror of drunk driving, not the terrible ** caused by it, but the terrible that so many people have become criminals. What he means is that if drunk driving is abolished, China will reduce the number of criminals by 360,000 a year.

Second, data cannot be used one-sidedly.

After being criminalized for drunk driving, how many people have followed the principle of "don't drink while driving, and don't drive if you drink" because of this. If there is no criminal punishment for drunk driving, the proportion of drunk driving may exceed 70-80%, and if the police go on the road to investigate, it will not be the concept of 900,000 cases in half a year, I am afraid that there will be 9 million cases. At present, the number of motor vehicles in the country has reached 100 million, including 100 million cars, which can be estimated by primary school students.

Third, there are also reasons such as whether someone is drunk driving because the punishment is too light. Is it just because a measure is wrong that it does not achieve the desired effect? Logic is clearly not like this.

If we only take one bite and feel that our stomach is still not full, don't we eat anymore? If we have a cold and only take one pill and the illness is not cured, will we stop taking medicine? What a simple and naïve idea to think that everything will be fine as long as you get a drunk driving sentence.

Why would anyone risk death and drunk driving? And not because of:

First, the luck psychology in human nature is strange, thinking that his life is a great blessing, and the king of Hades will let him go;

Second, some people think that their technology is good and they will not have an accident, even if there is an accident, there is still a relationship that can be settled;

Third, the punishment is still too small, if you drink and drive, you will be fined 100,000 yuan and banned from driving for 10 years; If you drive drunk twice or drive drunk, you will be fined 1 million and banned from driving for life.

First of all, to make my point of view, I am against !!

1. Drunk driving is not a sentence that makes people more human and warm

You're dealing with the law. In the deputy's view, abolishing the criminalization of drunk driving and increasing the intensity and scope of administrative punishment for drunk driving can reflect the human feelings and temperature of the law, but the law is the place where there is no need for human favor and more warmth, and the so-called law does not tolerate mercy, since they have violated the law, they will be punished, and those who know that they have violated the law and still drive drunk are the ones who really regard the law as child's play, and such people are not worthy of sympathy.

2. The criminalization of drunk driving cannot be abolished simply for the purpose of reducing the crime rate

This represents the proposal to abolish the punishment for drunkenness to reduce the crime rate, and I personally think it is ridiculous, is it afraid that the crime rate will increase, so the law will be abolished? If other corresponding laws are abolished, then there will be no crime, but this is not the case, and the reduction of the crime rate really depends on the iron-faced selflessness of the law.

Only by truly strictly enforcing the law, strictly abiding by discipline, strictly abiding by the precepts, and not touching the bottom line of the law, can we truly get the society we want!

Zhu Lieyu, a deputy to the National People's Congress, will once again submit a motion on "proposing the crime of drunk driving and dangerous driving" at the two sessions of the National People's Congress this year. This is the second year in a row that he has campaigned for the "cancellation of drunk driving sentences".

Zhu Lieyu said that the abolition of the crime of drunk driving does not mean that the illegal act of drunk driving will not be investigated. On the contrary, while restricting the application of the criminal law, it is recommended to increase the intensity and scope of administrative penalties for drunk driving. Abolishing the crime of drunk driving can make the law more humane and warm, and can also greatly reduce the crime rate, which is conducive to the construction of a harmonious society.

He said that the two bills he will submit at the 2022 National People's Congress and the National People's Congress are both related to drunk driving: one is to propose the abolition of the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving, and the other is to propose the establishment of a criminal record sealing system for drunk driving to help offenders reintegrate into society.

As a serious violation, according to Article 91 of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, drunk driving of a motor vehicle shall be restrained by the traffic management department of the public security organ until it sobers up, and the motor vehicle driver's license shall be revoked, and the motor vehicle driver's license shall not be re-obtained within ten years after the criminal responsibility is investigated, and the motor vehicle driver's license shall not be driven after re-obtaining the motor vehicle driver's license. However, if the punishment for drunk driving is abolished, it means that indulging in crime, drunk driving accidents, will cause mental blows to themselves and others, leaving people with lifelong regret and permanent pain, and only by enacting strong laws can it play a role in warning others.

If the practice of criminalizing drunk driving is removed, it will make more and more traffic accidents in society, cause more accidents, and bring disasters to more families, and with such a punishment, more people will not drink when driving, and it will reduce drunk driving, thereby reducing the occurrence of traffic accidents, so I think it is impossible to cancel the criminalization of drunk driving.

Hello, I'm glad to answer for you, I don't think it should be canceled, you only saw them drunk driving ** But you don't know that they were lucky with the law before they did it, and they didn't pay attention to the law, for the sake of social security, I don't think it should be canceled.

The establishment of a strict management system by the state would have played a very good role in preventing this from happening, and I think his proposal is very inappropriate. So it will inevitably not be adopted by everyone.

Oppose! Drunk driving harms oneself and others, and must be severely punished, and a safe environment must be returned to the road.

Penalties should be increased to protect the safety of traffic participants.

Yes, it's still okay to drive with a slight drink.

Legal analysis: Drunk driving still has to be investigated for criminal responsibility, but in recent years, many places have begun to introduce relevant regulations on acres and land, and Kaima has made new standards for drunk driving criminal standards. However, it should be noted that not prosecuting drunk driving does not mean that the crime is indulged, but that minor crimes can be dealt with leniently.

Due to the current different standards in different places, whether drunk driving behavior is not prosecuted may be implemented according to local conditions, the following are some of the detailed rules formulated in some regions, and if the circumstances of drunk driving are minor, they may be considered not prosecuting:

1. The owner of the car has not started driving the car after drinking, and it has not been seized.

2. After driving a certain distance after drinking, the owner did not continue to drive drunk but pulled over in time to sleep.

3. The alcohol content of the car owner still reaches more than 80 mg after drinking for several hours or overnight.

4. The owner of the car is drunk after drinking, but needs to be sent to the hospital for treatment in time due to the illness of his family.

5. When the owner moves the car into the parking space, it is not driving on the road.

6. In the event of a traffic accident, the drivers on both sides are drunk driving, and the driver in front is rear-ended, but the alcohol content is lower than the alcohol content of the rear-end chaser, and the rear-end driver is fully responsible.

Legal basis: "Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 91 Anyone who drives a motor vehicle after drinking alcohol shall have his motor vehicle driver's license suspended for six months and shall be fined not less than 1,000 yuan but not more than 2,000 yuan. Those who are punished for driving a motor vehicle after drinking alcohol and drive a motor vehicle after drinking alcohol again are to be detained for up to 10 days, fined between 1,000 and 2,000 RMB, and have their motor vehicle driver's license revoked.

If a person drives a motor vehicle while intoxicated, the traffic management department of the public security organ shall restrain him until he sobers up, revoke the driver's license of the motor vehicle, and investigate the responsibility of the criminal offender in accordance with the law; A motor vehicle driver's license may not be re-obtained within five years.

Anyone who drives a commercial motor vehicle after drinking alcohol shall be detained for 15 days, fined 5,000 yuan, have his motor vehicle driver's license revoked, and shall not re-obtain a motor vehicle driver's license for five years.

Anyone who drives a motor vehicle while intoxicated shall be restrained by the traffic management department of the public security organ until he sobers up, and the driver's license of the motor vehicle shall be revoked, and criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with law; A motor vehicle driver's license shall not be re-obtained within ten years, and after the motor vehicle driver's license is re-obtained, a motor vehicle shall not be driven.

If a major traffic accident occurs after drinking alcohol or driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with law, and the motor vehicle driver's license shall be revoked by the traffic management department of the public security organ, and the motor vehicle driver's license shall not be re-obtained for life.

<>If the criminalization of drunk driving is abolished, the phenomenon of drunk driving will become more rampant

Since the law includes drunk driving as a criminal punishment, hundreds of thousands of drunk driving cases have been tried in China. It turns out that there are still many people who are bold and willing to take chances despite the threat of going to jail. If the deputy's recommendation is to remove the penalty for drunk driving, drivers who like to drink and drive will be even more rampant.

Once indulged, traffic cases caused by drunk driving will rise significantly, and more and more people will be injured or lose their lives in drunk driving cases. For the safety of themselves and their families, netizens will naturally vigorously oppose the expert's proposal.

People who do not have self-control need to be bound by the law

Drunk driving itself is a violation of the law and a violation of morality. Under the control of the law, drunk people may choose to substitute for fear of jail time. But once the advice of experts is adopted, drunk driving is excluded from the criminal law and only administrative punishment is imposed, then for those who have money and power, this measure is almost equivalent to nothing, because such people can settle a lot of things with a little money.

If this happens, it will be a complete violation of the right of citizens to liberties and equality in our country. In order to prevent this from happening, the threat of imprisonment hanging over the head of the drunk person must exist.

Increasing penalties is the only way to reduce drunk driving to a greater extent

The expert recommended that the drunk driving penalty be abolished because he did not believe that this measure would significantly improve the phenomenon of drunk driving. In fact, people are also afraid of losing their property as much as they are afraid of going to jail. Therefore, if the administrative punishment can be increased at the same time as the criminal punishment of drunk driving, the phenomenon of drunk driving may be reduced more quickly.

In short, for the sake of everyone's life safety, netizens will never agree to cancel the punishment for drunk driving. Instead of working this, it is better to think more about how to better eliminate the phenomenon of drunk driving.

This practice of the people's congress deputies is very wrong, and the consequences of the act of violating the traffic law are also very serious, and the sentence cannot be commuted.

Drunk drivers are referred to as "road killers", and drunk drivers driving on the road greatly threaten public safety, so the abolition of drunk driving criminalization greatly reduces the cost of crime, and will make more and more people ignore the danger of drinking and driving on the road.

Drunk driving itself is a very dangerous behavior, not only to oneself and others, but also very harmful, so netizens are very opposed to canceling the criminalization of drunk driving.

No. The state has not abolished the criminalization of drunk driving. Driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated is a criminal act that constitutes the crime of dangerous driving, and the penalty standard is:

He was sentenced to criminal detention and a fine. In addition, those who drive a motor vehicle while intoxicated will also be subject to administrative punishment: the traffic management department of the public security organ will be restrained until they sober up, the motor vehicle driver's license will be revoked, and the criminal responsibility will be pursued in accordance with the law; A motor vehicle driver's license may not be re-obtained within five years.

1. You can't get a driver's license for a few years after driving while intoxicated.

1. Drunk driving of a motor vehicle shall be subject to the control of the traffic management unit of the public security department until he sobers up, cancel the driver's license of the vehicle, and pursue criminal punishment; You can't get a motor vehicle license for five years.

2. If a person drives a motor vehicle while intoxicated, the traffic management unit of the public security department shall control it until he sobers up, cancel the driver's license of the vehicle, and investigate his criminal punishment; You cannot obtain a motor vehicle license again for 10 years, and you cannot drive or operate a motor vehicle after obtaining a motor vehicle license again.

3. If a person is suspected of committing a crime after drinking alcohol or driving a vehicle while drunk in a serious road traffic accident, he shall be investigated for criminal punishment and the driver's license of the vehicle shall be cancelled by the traffic management unit of the public security department, and the driver's license of the motor vehicle shall not be obtained again for life.

2. New standards for the identification of drunk driving.

1. Judgment criteria for drunk driving: the driving behavior of the vehicle driver with a blood alcohol content greater than or equal to 80mg 100ml.

2. According to the national "Threshold and Test of Blood and Breath Alcohol Content of Vehicle Drivers", a driver with a blood alcohol content of 20-80 mg in 100 ml is a drunk driver, and a driver with a blood alcohol content of more than 80 mg is considered drunk driving.

3. The blow test is not included in the drunk driving identification. According to the standard of evidence collection in criminal cases, drivers suspected of drunk driving must have blood drawn for evidence. The investigation of the alcohol monitoring instrument data in drunk driving is only a method for the traffic police to judge drunk driving in the early stage, and an appraisal conclusion is made through the comparison of the alcohol content in the suspect's body.

Legal basis: Article 133 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Whoever violates the regulations on the administration of transportation and thus causes a major accident, causing serious injury or death to a person or causing major losses to public or private property, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or short-term detention; Where a person escapes after causing a traffic accident or has other especially heinous circumstances, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment is to be given; Whoever causes death as a result of escape shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than seven years.