-
The scenic spot involved responded that the section of the road was indeed an internal road in the scenic spot, and the staff charge was reasonable. But judging from the screenshots of the chat with the scenic spot shown by the rider Xie, the scenic spot obviously knows that he is at a loss and wants to take back the invoice in Xie's hand. <>
A few days ago, the rider Xie and his companions were forced to charge an entrance fee of 160 yuan when they rode through Mangshan National Forest Park. According to the staff, this road is the internal road of the scenic spot, and only those who buy tickets can pass, and the fee standard is 80 yuan per person, and it is reasonable to charge Xie a toll of 160 yuan. In the face of Xie's questioning, the staff later changed their words and said that if Xie and his companions had an accident on the road section, the travel company would be responsible, and the 160 yuan was equivalent to "protection money".
As a last resort, Xie paid a "ticket fee" of 160 yuan, but only got an invoice, not a ticket for Mangshan National Forest Park. <>
What's even more strange is that the so-called ticket fee of 160 yuan was transferred to the private account of the staff of the travel company, and did not enter the company's account. Afterwards, Xie got in touch with the local Bureau of Culture, Sports and Tourism, and the staff admitted that the management was indeed not in place. Up to now, the staff of the scenic spot has not come up with any documents that can prove that the road is an internal road, and according to the navigation, the section of the road Xie passed through is 088 county road, and it should not be charged.
Xie **** to the social platform after causing heated discussions on the Internet, the original mandatory fee travel company then contacted Xie and asked Xie to send the travel receipt back, and they returned the 160 yuan "ticket fee" to Xie. <>
Prior to this, the response of the scenic spot involved was: This section of the road is the internal road of the scenic spot, and the toll is a normal operation, and there is nothing wrong with it. If the scenic spot involved has a clear conscience, why do you have to do one thing in front of you and one behind the other?
On the surface, he issued a statement saying that his fees were reasonable and legitimate, but behind the scenes, he wanted to "destroy the evidence"? Of course, Xie did not agree to the conditions of the travel company, saying that he would continue to protect his rights and interests through legal channels.
-
The staff of the scenic spot said that by accessing the video of the day, it can be found that the distance of the man's ride does belong to the scope of the scenic spot, and the road is also built by the scenic spot, so the staff charges are completely in line with the regulations.
-
The scenic spot said that it had returned the fee to the party later, and was willing to guarantee that if someone passed by in the future, there would be no charge.
-
The staff of the scenic spot has refunded the money, but also thinks that there is also a charge for passing by.
-
Everyone can understand that there is a fee for visiting the scenic spot, but if you have to be charged for admission just by passing through this scenic spot, it seems a bit unreasonable. For example, in Chenzhou, Hunan Province, a rider, Mr. Xie, was forced to charge 160 yuan for an entrance fee when he rode along County Road 088 to Yaozhai and passed through Mangshan National Forest Park. After an argument with Mr. Xie, the rider Mr. Xie believed that this section of the road belonged to the county road, not the road inside the scenic spot, and the scenic spot had no right to charge a toll of 160 yuan.
However, the scenic spot said that this section of the road belongs to the internal road of the scenic spot, belongs to the tourist attraction, and when passing through this section of the road, it belongs to the scenic spot, and the scenic fee of 160 yuan should be paid.
Such a reason is difficult for Mr. Xie to accept, because he did not enter the scenic area, not only passing by this road, but also being charged a toll of 160 yuan, which is simply unreasonable. Then the staff asked for relevant documents to the staff, and the staff said that they had the documents, and the reason for the charge was that if there was any problem in this section of the scenic road, such as wrestling, then it was within the scope of the tourism company's responsibility.
However, the cross talk insisted that this section of the road on the navigation showed the only way to go to the millennium Yaozhai this time, and it was not a scenic road, but 088 county road. Mr. Xie was forced to pay 160 yuan for the entrance fee to the scenic spot, and after paying the fee, he only gave him a receipt, showing that the money was transferred to a private account. Mr. Xie himself did not accept such an outcome.
After that, the staff of the scenic spot replied that after investigation, the police from the local police station testified that Mr. Xie did not go to the Mangshan Scenic Area to play, so he could refund the money.
Such a thing is obviously very difficult for the public to accept, after all, until now, the scenic spot has not provided any valid documents to show that it has the right to collect tolls. In this way, the charge for entering is unreasonable, and Mr. Xie is also asked to send the receipt and then return the ticket to them, without giving any other reasonable reason. After all, according to the navigation display, that section of the road does belong to the county road, and the staff of the scenic spot have no right to collect tolls from people passing by the laneway.
And there is no reasonable explanation for why this money is charged. When I asked for relevant documents, I just said that there were documents, but in fact I didn't show the real documents. Many netizens commented on this incident, it is like I drove this road and planted this tree.
If such things happen frequently and are not rectified, all parts of the country will follow suit, creating a very bad social atmosphere.
-
I think what this scenic spot is doing is very wrong, it is completely a forced consumption behavior, and this man can completely protect his rights and interests through legal means.
-
Personally, I don't think this charging model is reliable at all, because I think other people are just riding through and not traveling with you.
-
I think it's weird. The management of this scenic spot is also too poor, and it is obvious that it wants to make more money, but this method is unacceptable.
-
Such behaviour should be resisted. It's just that I didn't go to **, I shouldn't charge tickets like this, the man is really unlucky.
-
I think that's understandable. This is because the scenic area has the rules and regulations of the scenic area, and once you enter the scenic area, you should charge the corresponding entrance fee.
-
In fact, this man could have taken a detour, because it would cost money to enter this scenic spot, so it was understandable that they wanted tickets.
-
This kind of scenic behavior is very confusing, because such reasons cannot convince others well, and it will also affect the credibility of their own scenic spots.
-
I don't understand this kind of behavior, whether I went in when I passed by, why did I collect tickets with men. It's really incorrect, and it's also unethical.
-
I think this is relatively good, such a scenic spot ticket is good, and it is also very good.
-
It's okay to collect money, but what's the deal if you don't get a receipt for the tickets.
-
Lulu is acting legally in a crime!
-
I really want money
Related questions