Is it feasible to require residents to remove window guards by themselves for the renovation of resi

Requirements for thermal insulation renovation of residential buildings. Blessing to remove the window protector by yourself. Is it feasible?

This is the case if. If you agree. If possible, dismantle it yourself, but safety must come first.

Don't renovate residential buildings for insulation. Don't do things that don't protect your life.

First of all, the insulation renovation of residential buildings requires residents to remove the warehouse guardrails by themselves, which is a good thing, because the walls need to be repaired, and if there are guardrails, it will hinder the project, and I think you should consciously remove them.

Hello, you can't dismantle the building facilities by yourself. This is prone to safety hazards.

This estimate still has to ask about the property, but if you remove the guardrail to build a closed balcony like a balcony, then it is not a big problem, because it is no longer useful, but if it is not a closed balcony, there must be a guardrail, for safety.

Because the guardrail is your own item, and it may also be added by yourself, it makes sense to let you disassemble it yourself.

Then please ask if the downstairs of my house is built very high, and the downstairs will not be demolished. Instead, I asked my house to remove the window guard. Don't dismantle or replace the windows. I don't understand why?

Residential building body temperature renovation requires residents to remove window guardrails by themselves, which is also okay.

Is it feasible to require residents to remove window guardrails for residential buildings?

The thermal insulation renovation of the private building requires the residents to remove the window guardrails by themselves, which is not allowed, because to a certain extent, this is the person in charge to dismantle it.

In order to ensure the quality of construction, it is best to remove the guardrail for construction and installation. In this way, the construction can avoid the relocation of the corners, and the more difficult parts can be insulated. The insulation layer as a whole can not be damaged, and the insulation effect will be better.

If the guardrail is not removed, some of the parts covered by the guardrail will be difficult to construct and operate, which will affect the insulation effect. Rainwater and moisture can easily seep into the insulation layer from the gap in the guardrail avoidance part, affecting the insulation effect. So it is better to remove the guardrail and install the insulation layer, so that the effect will be better.

There is nothing wrong with this, and the renovation of the community must protect the safety of the residents.

Of course, you can do a good job of protection when you change it, don't break it. After changing the windows, use silicone sealant to seal the joints. Pay attention to the sticker tape when sealing, otherwise it will stain the exterior walls and windows.

For the safety of their own personal and property, it is a common phenomenon for residents on the first floor of multi-storey houses to install guardrails at the windows of the exterior walls of their houses. Although this practice is reasonable, it may also become a staircase from the exterior wall to the upper floor of the house, providing convenient conditions for criminals to enter the house on the upper floor without a security fence through this staircase to commit criminal acts. Therefore, it is obvious that the behavior of the residents on the ground floor to install safety guardrails at the windows of the exterior wall endangers the residential safety of the residents on the upper floor.

Therefore, the residents of the ground floor shall not install barriers to the dwelling on the upper floor at the windows of the external wall, especially the installation of guardrails beyond the wall plane, which should become a general code of conduct to ensure the safety of the dwelling on the upper floor and to restrain the occupants of the ground floor. Article 83 of the General Principles of the Civil Law stipulates that the adjacent parties to immovable property shall correctly handle the adjacent relationship in accordance with the spirit of conducive to production, convenience of life, solidarity and mutual assistance, fairness and reasonableness. Where obstructions or losses are caused to neighboring parties, the infringement shall be stopped, the obstruction removed, and the losses compensated.

It can be seen from this that as a kind of neighborly relationship, the lower floor residents have the obligation not to install facilities that pose a potential danger to the upper floor residents, and if they are installed, the upper floor residents have the right to request the installer to eliminate the danger.

It should be noted that the installation of such facilities in the lower class does not in itself directly constitute an infringement or obstruction to the upper class residents, but rather that such facilities pose a potential danger, that is, they may become a condition for criminals to commit criminal acts. This potential danger is determined by the normal perception of the majority of the people, not by the fact that the crime has occurred. Therefore, in the case of your letter, the fact that the crime did not occur does not prevent the upper class residents from exercising their right to claim the removal of the danger against the lower class residents.

If the negotiation fails, you can directly file a lawsuit with the people's court, and I believe that the court will protect your legitimate rights and interests in accordance with the law.

If the anti-theft windows installed by residents do not meet the requirements of the community as a whole, or there are some other unsafe factors, they cannot be removed completely, but they may be subject to relevant procedures or announcements or rectification notices.

For this part, the state has a policy, and if the policy is violated, the relevant departments can dismantle it.

If it involves security or something, it can be disassembled.

You can communicate with your Bi Na Property Meditation Practice, because the hand rent code is like this installation must be approved by the property, if the property does not agree, the property will make him demolish.

1. The prefabricated panel wall of the brick-concrete pants lifting cavity structure cannot be removed, nor can the doors and windows be opened. In particular, brick walls with a thickness of more than 24cm are generally load-bearing walls and cannot be easily dismantled and reconstructed. Load-bearing walls not only maintain the balance of the entire house structure, but also bear the weight of the building.

If easily dismantled, it will cause serious dangers.

In addition to load-bearing walls, lightweight walls cannot be easily removed because they carry part of the weight of the house, and demolition can also damage its structure. The walls that can be demolished are light body walls and hollow core slabs that serve as partition walls. Because they do not bear any pressure and weight at all, they only play a role in separating the space, and there is no impact on the structure of the house after demolition.

If you feel that the load-bearing wall will affect the decoration and must be removed, it is not completely unacceptable. However, the original design unit must give the modification and reinforcement of the design plan before the demolition and modification can be carried out. It is necessary to ensure that the scheme is correct and effective before the demolition can be carried out.

Second, the door frame can not be easily removed, because they are embedded in concrete, after the removal will reduce the safety factor, and it will be more difficult to reinstall.

3. The low wall at the boundary of the balcony cannot be removed, because it has the effect of provoking the balcony, and if it is forcibly removed, the bearing capacity of the balcony will decrease, causing the balcony to fall. If you want to do so, you can remove the doors and windows on the wall between the room and the balcony.

Fourth, the beams and columns in the room are used to support the upper floor, and the demolition or transformation will cause the upper floors to fall down, which will be very dangerous, so the beams and columns cannot be dismantled or transformed.

Fifth, the steel bars in the walls of the house are also immovable. When burying the pipeline, if the steel bar is destroyed, it will affect the bearing weight of the wall and floor slab, leaving a more serious safety hazard.

then you are going to tear it down.

The question is who exactly does this location belong to, you hang it between the first and second floors, below the level of the balcony window on the second floor, that is actually higher than the balcony floor on the second floor, and the wall above the balcony floor on the second floor is the location of his house.

If you hang the first floor on the wall on the second floor of someone's house, do you want the second floor to hang on the wall between the second floor and the third floor?

And then the 3rd floor hangs on the wall on the 3rd and 4th floors? Then the 4th floor What should I do?

Right, it's the same as what I thought, you get stuck on the 1st floor and 2nd floor location, you let the 2nd floor go to the card 2nd floor and 3rd floor location, and then the 3rd floor goes to the card 3rd floor and 4th floor location, you make the 4th floor card **?

Now it's the second floor that makes the most sense, whose wall is used by whom, and you can't go to the wall of someone's house, or you can call the whole building to a referendum, but it is still someone's wall and whose house is used to card other people's wall, whether you block the view or not, it is occupying someone's wall.

If there is a threat of infringement on the adjacent relationship, the obstruction may be removed in accordance with the law.

In the case of adjacency, the solar energy on the first floor hinders the second floor from doing wall insulation, and it is obliged to cooperate with the second floor to remove its own solar energy, and the cost is borne by the first floor.

This kind of exterior wall hanging solar energy, if it does not affect the overall safety, it is recommended to negotiate with the upstairs residents.

If it does not affect the living environment on the second floor, it does not involve the neighboring rights of the other party, and according to what you said, the other party should be an unreasonable request. If the other party insists on moving, you need the other party to pay the relevant expenses to move to a place that does not affect your normal use.