How to evaluate the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO

The extreme self-interested nature of Trump is exposed. The reason for withdrawing from the group is very simple, I spent so much money to support you WHO, and your WHO has been helping China speak during the epidemic, saying that the United States is not good, then I'm sorry, I might as well withdraw from the group directly, so that I can save money. But to be honest, the weight of the WHO is much heavier than the group that Trump withdrew in previous years, especially in this special period of the epidemic, the WHO has to play a leading role in the global fight against the epidemic.

As the country with the most serious epidemic in the world, the United States will only go further and further on the road of herd immunity by withdrawing from the WHO at this time. Moreover, the whole world is actively supporting the work of the WHO, and even some anti-China countries are in line with China in supporting the work of the WHO. Trump's withdrawal from the group is very simple, it is the embodiment of "America First", but this priority is gradually isolating the United States in the world, and even alienating its relations with traditional allies, perhaps this is why so many people call Trump "Chuan Jianguo".

A ** that allows the United States to gradually lose its international influence is in the interests of China, which needs to expand its international influence.

Nothing out of the ordinary.

There are two parties in the United States, and the Democratic Party is more enthusiastic about "saving the world", so they prefer to participate in various international organizations to help countries around the world. The Republican Party, on the other hand, has no interest in "saving the world" and is more focused on American interests. For Republicans:

The United States suffers from participating in various international organizations, because no matter which international organization it is, it is the United States that pays the most. In fact, with the Republican philosophy, the United States should withdraw from all international organizations.

The reason for the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO: This is Trump's habitual practice. As soon as a world organization does not act according to the will of the United States, Trump will immediately retaliate by withdrawing from the group.

Impact on the United States and the world: The move to withdraw from the WHO "will not protect the lives or interests of the American people, but will make Americans sick and leave the United States isolated."

Since the spread of the new crown pneumonia epidemic in the United States, the United States has been busy shifting the responsibility for its own ineffective response to the epidemic, and one of the most important targets is the World Health Organization.

Yes, as of March 2021, the United States has withdrawn from the WHO.

On July 7, 2020, a senior U.S. official U.S. House confirmed that the White House had officially withdrawn the U.S. from the WHO. The U.S. withdrawal took effect on July 6 and the UN Secretary-General had been notified, the ** said.

On April 14, 2020, at a White House press conference, Trump announced that the United States would suspend funding for the World Health Organization, accusing the World Health Organization of not sharing information on the epidemic in a timely manner, failing to provide timely advice on epidemic prevention policies, and failing to declare a "global pandemic" in a timely manner. Trump said "after all this time, it's time to hold them accountable for this."

As of March 2021, the United States has not officially withdrawn from the WHO. On July 8, 2020, according to a number of U.S. ** reports, the Trump administration in the United States, which has repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past few months, finally made a decision and announced its official withdrawal.

But even if Trump officially announces his withdrawal from the World Health Organization, according to the United Nations, formal withdrawal from the World Health Organization requires a year's notice to the United Nations before he can withdraw.

The spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General also confirmed that the United States had officially notified UN Secretary-General António Guterres on July 6 that it would withdraw from the WHO on July 6, 2021. In other words, there is still a one-year "cooling-off period" between the announcement of the United States' formal withdrawal from the WHO and the actual loss of the United States' membership in the WHO.

There is no benefit to the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO, and if the United States does not participate in the relevant WHO cooperation projects, the ability of the American people to obtain vaccines** may be limited; If the United States is not a member of the WHO, the country's global health strategy for a rapid response to international disease outbreaks will also be affected, as WHO has long tracked and responded to outbreaks of infectious diseases around the world.

Health and security in the United States and around the world requires strong cooperation between the United States and WHO. It is unlikely that the United States will sever its relationship with the WHO without major disruption and disruption, and the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO will put the American people in an even more insecure position.

It will have a positive impact on both sides, and the two sides can share medical technology and epidemic prevention experience, which has played a role in promoting the prevention and control of the global epidemic.

If the United States returns to the WHO, it will be more conducive to the WHO's activities around the world, and it will also be conducive to the United States in the prevention and control of the new crown epidemic, which will play a very important role in the stability of the whole world.

Of course, it is very good for the WHO, but it must be punished accordingly, so that it can be more authoritative.

Although the withdrawal of the United States has caused a lot of dissatisfaction in the past, for better development in the future, global cooperation is inevitable, and cooperation between the two will promote the development of world health and help them face risks and challenges together.

For the United States, it is very likely that they will reduce the epidemic in their own country. For the WHO, they will be helped by the United States to make the world's health safer.

The return of the United States to the WHO will be of great help to the new crown epidemic in the United States and can help the United States end the epidemic as soon as possible.

The United States is due to its own internal reasons. So withdraw from the WHO, this is to satisfy political interests. The re-entry of the United States into the WHO requires a reassertion of international standing.

The WHO needs the United States, and the United States needs the WHO. After all, the United States is still the member state with the largest contribution to the WHO, (although it has been in arrears, it has not paid its membership fees since 2019, and the United States would have had to pay about 100 million dollars in membership dues in 2020.) As of July 2020, the United States still owes about $200 million in contributions to WHO.

For this return, the membership fee should be paid first. The level of medical and health technology in the United States is still the most advanced in the world. The return of the United States to the WHO still has a positive effect on the WHO and global medical and health technology.

We should welcome this decision by the United States.

The United States has to pay a high fee to the World Health Organization every year, resulting in a psychological imbalance in the United States, and it is unwilling to pay high fees. And because the new crown epidemic is highly questioned in the United States, the United States is afraid that the World Health Organization will go to the United States to investigate, and the whole world is afraid that the spearhead will be pointed at them.

The United States has to pay a high fee to the World Health Organization every year, and is unwilling to pay a high fee, and because the new crown epidemic is highly questioned in the United States, the United States is afraid that the World Health Organization will go to the United States to investigate, and the most important thing is that there is a suspicion of dumping.

Because the United States believes that it allocates so much money to the WHO every year, but the WHO has constantly criticized the United States for its practices and called on countries to learn from China during the epidemic, which is not in line with their America-first philosophy, and feels that there is no return for their efforts, so they insist on withdrawing.

The United States has withdrawn from the WHO because of the unfavorable protection against the epidemic, many of its citizens have been affected, and it cannot bear some responsibility if it insists on doing so.

No, all countries must uphold the authority of the WHO, and at the same time, the WHO will go through certain conditions and screenings.

It's not that it will be returned, but when the United States said that it would withdraw from the WHO, it had not yet been reviewed, and it is still within the review period, and it is still relatively easy for the United States to return to the WHO now.

It's not that easy. The United States, once WHO's largest donor, has been in arrears for a long time. In total, more than 80 major environmental policies have been reversed since Trump took office, and more than 20 are in the process of being reversed.

It can be seen that the longer the United States withdraws from the Paris Agreement, the more difficult it will be to re-engage. With regard to the "return" of the United States, we should not only listen to its words, but also observe its deeds.

However, it is not easy for the United States to "rejoin the group". According to the plan, the United States will not withdraw from the WHO until July next year, and the relevant withdrawal process is underway. If the United States rejoins, there is no precedent for how to deal with it.

In addition, the United States, once the largest donor to WHO, has been in arrears for a long time. After Trump threatened to "cut off supplies" earlier this year, the United States also accumulated more and more arrears of membership dues.

It should still be very difficult for other countries to add back, but after all, the strength of the United States is there, and it can still be added back if it is necessary. But it must be cut out of the meat.

Treat the WHO as a child's play, and be severely punished! There is a price to pay.

The money is paid, and you will join tomorrow.

Pay all outstanding payments first, and then vote by show of hands.

It depends on who. The big guy of the United States, who dares to say no.

Public toilets? Come when you want, go when you want.