What do you think about the property to charge the owner for parking?

In accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations such as the Property Law and local property management regulations, the ownership and income attribution relationship shall be determined. Whoever owns the property rights and the profits should also belong to whom, and the charging standards shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Price Bureau. If the property right of the parking space in the community is owned by the developer, the income should belong to the developer.

The income of civil air defense parking spaces should belong to the Civil Air Defense Bureau, and the income of parking spaces in public areas should go to the owners. The property is only managed on behalf of the owner, the income should be accounted for separately, the specific property depends on the property and the developer and the civil air defense bureau and the property committee how to talk, a single owner you have no way to resist saying that you do not pay parking fees, unless the property committee is established through the double majority of the owners after the vote to form a resolution, decide that all the owners of the common part of the parking space is not charged, otherwise the property can always be charged, to put it bluntly, the money collected by the property is not all their own.

The property industry will be abolished, and the design of people's livelihood issues will be handed over to the community for unified management.

Cancel the property and let the community directly manage the owners' committee. Exercise self-government.

The property is too chaotic ...... nowIt is necessary to clarify what services residents are entitled to after paying the property fee......

Big**, lawless, I've been in the past 3600 years, too machine pit, no one can control them.

The parking space belongs to the owner, so why do outsiders charge?

It is hoped that the state will introduce a series of measures as soon as possible to ban the phenomenon of indiscriminate property charges, the community is the majority of owners, the property is the owner's agent manager, for the income of advertising fees, parking fees belong to the owners, and many properties have charged the owner's management fee, not at all to solve the actual problems of the owner, the main and secondary are clear, the property must serve the owner wholeheartedly.

It is extremely unreasonable to charge the owner for parking!

If you have a shared area in the house, why do you have to charge money for your own place?

I really don't know what the reason for the property charge is, and now the property only collects money, and the others are not responsible, I really hope that everyone will join forces to expel this so-called property.

When you buy a house, you buy a shared area, if you charge again, is it a secondary charge, if the car has scratched the property, will you give pre-compensation.

The vacant land in the community belongs to the owner, and the property has no right to charge parking fees. Besides, the property is for money, and he is not for the owner.

The property should have been cancelled, and he was the source of social instability

It shouldn't be charged, haven't you given them a property management fee, and it is unreasonable to want to repeat the charge.

If I give a formal invoice, I will pay it. Because it can be reimbursed.

They are all understanding people, but they are still bullied.

The property should be canceled, and the money should not be done.

Fees are charges, what are the obligations of the property after the charges, you can't collect money and don't do anything.

The property and the owner are always opposites.

Without property, the community can't live a day! The owner and the property should not be in opposition. It is unreasonable for the community to charge parking fees, but it should be understood that some management fees are charged for overtime and over-parking.

The key is that the fees should be publicized, and the fees belong to the public, including community advertising (only elevator advertising, each community has at least 100,000 yuan a year), and these revenues should be amortized to the property cost of the owner, and the community facilities and management should be improved. The owner should cooperate with the understanding and support of the property and pay the property fee in full in a timely manner, which is the foundation of the property operation. The owner is in arrears, the west family does not pay, the property is unsustainable, and the service is impossible.

The property only cares about the fee and ignores the service, and it cannot survive. A good community must be a virtuous circle of interaction between the two, getting better and better. If your service is not in place, I will not pay, and if you do not pay, I will stop serving, resulting in a vicious circle.

This is a bilateral issue, not as simple as blaming one side. May all communities live in harmony and live and work in peace and contentment.

It's not his turn to take it, he's just in charge of management.

The main problem is that the property company has an agreement or contract with the property committee of the community, and the key issue across the country is whether the property committee has protected the interests of the owner. If the property committee signs a contract or agreement with the property, stipulating that the property has the right to collect parking fees from the owner, then from a legal point of view, the community has authorized the property to have the right to collect parking fees, and there is already a legal basis at this time, so the property committee of the community plays a vital role in the management of the community. Why do many community property management companies feel reckless and have an unshirkable responsibility for inaction or collusion with the property committee of the community?

Parking fees include management fees and parking fees. If he buys a parking space, he can only charge a management fee, and he will be responsible for stealing, scraping, scratching, etc. If the car is the public area of the owner of the station community, the property can be reasonably charged, but most of the money belongs to all the owners, as the repair of the damaged road surface of the car, and a small part is managed by the property for order maintenance.

There are no laws and regulations yet. The property should be collected in consultation with all owners.

Clarify the relationship between the property and the owner, and the owner is the owner of the community! The property is just a nanny for the owner's service! The property has no right to charge at all!

Only with the authorization and consent of the owners' committee, the property can be charged! But the fee should be owned by all owners! And it is illegal for the property to be charged casually and owned by the property!

The owner has the right to refuse to pay! Think about it, it's ridiculous that your family caregiver will charge you!

For the affairs of the community, one is the property law, the other is the property management regulations, the property management regulations are different from place to place, and it is not a law, and the other is the property contract of the community, although he has a low level, but it also has a certain binding force. There are these aspects of parking fees in the community. The parking space is owned by the developer, and the owner pays the rent and management fee.

The parking space is the owner's own, and the owner pays a management fee. The parking space is a public parking lot owned by the owner of the community, and the owner has to pay a management fee in addition to the rent. This rent and administration fee is implemented at the local price guide.

The allocation of the management fee is reflected in the property contract. There is an internal contract for parking and parking spaces in the community, and the property is responsible for the damage and loss of the vehicle, but not necessarily for compensation, which is different from the parking lot outside, which needs to be noted.

The property management company is a service enterprise, and the service content is entrusted by the owner. The landlord entrusts you, and you provide the service within the scope of the landlord's entrustment, you are entitled to charge. For public parking spaces, you are not entitled to charge if the owner does not entrust you to provide management services.

Now the vast majority of property companies have serious dislocations, regard themselves as masters, do whatever they want, and can't get rid of them, and become ruffians. In addition, the owner should also be self-disciplined, and you are not the owner of an individual owner, and you have no right to dictate to the property. The master is the owner of the property and its authorized owners' committee.

Property disputes continue, mainly because the legal status, functions and powers of the owners' committee are not yet perfect, and they need to be resolved by legislation. The owners' committee needs to have a deliberative body, an executive body, a supervisory body, a complaint body, a funding, a special committee, and an external independent committee to truly play the role of community management services and rights protection.

The national policy is biased towards property, and although the owners park on the shared area, they do charge a management fee. As for you not to pay, no law enforcement agency will take care of it, which is to scare the owner. Only if they sue the court can the court decide, but even if the court decides, you can still not pay, after all, it is only a civil dispute, and he can't do anything with you, as for other departments can only mediate, don't worry.

Legal analysis: 1. The ownership of the parking space or garage that the developer does not include in the cost of sales and the shared area belongs to the developer, and the developer can agree to use it to the owners in the community through **, gift or lease. In this case, the above-mentioned parking fee shall belong to the developer or owner according to the agreement.

2. If the developer uses a road or other site jointly owned by the owners for parking cars and collecting fees, the proceeds shall be shared by all the owners. Article 55 of the "Property Management Regulations" stipulates that those who use the common parts of the property and the common facilities and equipment to operate shall go through the relevant formalities in accordance with the regulations after obtaining the consent of the relevant owners, the owners' general meeting and the property management service enterprise. The income obtained by the owners shall be mainly used to supplement the special maintenance funds, and may also be used in accordance with the decision of the owners' general meeting.

Legal basis: Article 74 of the Property Law of the People's Republic of China Within the building zoning, the parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars shall first meet the needs of the owners. The ownership of the parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars in the building zoning shall be agreed upon by the parties through **, lease, gift or lease.

Occupying a parking space on a road or other site that is jointly owned by the owners for parking cars belongs to the owners.

1. Whether the parking fee belongs to the owner or the property.

1. The parking fee belongs to the owner or the property, depending on the situation

1) The parking fee charged by the property is mainly used for operating costs, honorarium and profits;

2) If the parking space is owned by all owners; Then part of the profits from the parking fees collected should go to all owners;

3) If the area of the parking space is not included in the total construction area, it is an independent unit, and it is not a public use space, so it cannot be judged that it is shared by the owner.

2. Legal basis: Article 274 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

Roads within building zoning belong to the owners in common, except for urban public roads. The green space within the building zoning or the simplification belongs to the common ownership of the owners, except for the urban public green space or the express ownership of individuals. Other public places, public facilities and property service rooms in the building zoning belong to the owners in common.

Article 275.

In the building zoning, the ownership of the parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars shall be agreed upon by the parties through **, gifts or leases.

Parking spaces that occupy roads or other sites jointly owned by the owners for parking cars belong to the owners in common.

2. What is the composition of the property fee?

1. Manage the salary, social insurance and welfare fees of service personnel;

2. Daily operation and maintenance costs of common parts of the property and common facilities and equipment;

3. Cleaning and sanitation costs in the property management area;

4. Greening and maintenance costs in the property management area;

5. The cost of maintaining the order of the property management area;

6. Depreciation of fixed assets of property management enterprises;

7. The common parts and facilities of the property.

Charges can be charged for open-air parking lots planned in residential areas that are owned by all owners; Temporary or long-term parking in the developer's underground parking garage and parking building, if there is no purchase of parking spaces, you need to pay a fee to the developer; Outside of the above-mentioned areas, property management companies or developers have no right to charge parking fees if they do not have planned open-air parking spaces but public roads and green spaces. In fact, the community does not charge parking fees, and there are generally relevant agreements in the property service contract. The property service fee standard agreed in the property service contract generally does not include parking management service fees.

The parking service is a special service, and only money is charged for this service.

Legal basis: Article 54 of the "Property Management Regulations" uses the common parts of the property and the common facilities to set up jujube socks for business, and shall go through the relevant formalities in accordance with the provisions after obtaining the consent of the relevant owners, the owners' general meeting and the property service enterprise. The income obtained by the owners shall be mainly used to supplement the special maintenance funds, and may also be used in accordance with the decision of the general meeting of owners.

Look at whether it is the owner's parking space or the property's parking space.

Article 275 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

In the building zoning, the planned parking spaces and garages should first meet the needs of the owners. These parking spaces shall be agreed upon by the parties through **, excavation, search or rental. Occupying a parking space on a road or other site jointly owned by the owner for parking a car belongs to the owner's common ownership.