-
x^2+2011x-2012=(x-1)(x+2012) =0m,n) = (1, -2012)
m^2+2010m-2013)(n^2+2010n+2011) = (m^2 +2011m -2012 -m -1) (n^2 +2011n -2012 -n +4023)
m+1)(n-4023)
Apparently it has two possible values.
When m=1, n=-2012 brings in to get 2 (-2012-4023) and when m=-2012, n=1, brings in to get -2011*4022).
-
Solution: Because m,n is the root of x 2 + 2011x-2012 = 0, then m 2 + 2011 m - 2012 = 0, n 2 + 2011n - 2012 = 0
So m 2 + 2011 m = 2012 , n 2 + 2011n = 2012
So (m 2 + 2010 m - 2013) (n 2 + 2010n + 2011).
-
by x 2 + 2011 x - 2012 = 0
x-1)(x+2012)=0
Get x1=1 , x2=--2012
m^2+2010m-2013)(n^2+2010n+2011)(m^2+2010m-2011-2)(n^2+2010n-2011+4022)
m-1)(m+2011)-2][(n-1)(n+2011)+4022]
Substitute m=1 n=--2012 into the equation (or m=--2012 n=1 will result the same).
-
Answer: 1 because: m,n are both the roots of the equation +2010x-2012=0, so.
m}^+2012m-2012=0
+2010n-2012=0
So: +2012m-2011) ( 2010n-2011}( 2012m-2012+1) ( 2010n-2012+1}
-
The answer is -1, and the answer is as follows:
Because m and n are both the roots of the equation x 2 + 2007x-2009 = 0.
Therefore, m 2 + 2007m - 2009 = 0, that is, m 2 + 2007m = 2009
n 2 + 2007n - 2009 = 0, that is, n 2 + 2007n = 2009 so. m^2+2007m-2008)(n^2+2007n-2010)=(2009-2008)*(2009-2010)=1*(-1)=-1
-
From m and n are the two roots of the equation x2-2010x+2011=0, according to the definition of the root of the equation and the relationship between the root and the coefficient of the unary quadratic equation, we can get n2-2010n+2011=0, m2-2010m+2011=0, m+n=2010, mn=2011, and (n2-2011n+2012) (m2-2011m+2012)=(n2-2010n+2011+1-n) (m2-2010m+2011+1-m), you can find the answer
-
Vedic theorem. m+n=2011
m-n=-2011
mn=-2012
m*(Huai negotiation-n) = -2012
So -m and lead to -n are the 2 roots of the equation: x +2011x-2012=0.
Then the waiter is substituted.
m)²+2011m-2012=0
m²+2011m=2012
Similarly. n²+2011n=2012
Algebraic formula = (2012-2011) (2012-2013) = 1 (-1) = -1
-
Solution: m, n are the two brigade limbs of the equation Qi split x 2-2004x-2001=0.
then m 2-2004m-2001=0 and high town closed n 2-2004n-2001=0
m+n=2004,nm=-2001
m^2-2005m+3)(n^2-2005n+3)(m^2-2004m-2001-m+2004)(n^2-2004n-2001-n+2004)
2004-n)(2004-m)
mn-2004*(m+n)+2004^2
-
It is obtained from the root and coefficient correlation system (Wei Tuan's theorem).
m+n=2004,m*n=-2001
Substituting m into the equation x -2004x-2001 = 0 yields.
m²-2004m-2001=0
m²-2004m=2001
m²-2005m=2001-m
m reed or ant - 2005m+3=2001-m+3=2004-m, the same is true for n-2005n+3=2004-n
So. m²-2005m+3)(n²-2005n+3)(2004-m)(2004-n)
2004²-2004m-2004n+m*n2004²-2004(m+n)+m*n
-
Substituting x=m and x=n into the original equation respectively yields:
m^2+2010m+2011=0
n^2+2010n+2011=0
m^2+1010m+1010=-1
n^2+1010n+1012=1
m^+2010m+2010)(n^+2010n+2012)
-
m 2 + 2009m-2010 = m 2 + 2009m - 2009-1 = 0 is m 2 + 2009m-2009 = 1
n 2 + 2009n + 2010 = n 2 + 2009n - 2010 + 4020 = 0 is n 2 + 2009n - 2010 = -4020
So their product is -4020
If you understand the meaning of the root of the equation, you can understand the equation! I don't understand, you can ask me again.
It feels like there is a mistake in your problem, and the equation should be x 2-2xsina + sinb 2 = 0 >>>More
Solution 1: x +3x -3x+k
x +x +2x +2x-5x-5+5+kx (x+1)+2(x+1)-5(x+1)+(k+5), x3+3x2-3x+k has a factor of x+1, k+5=0 , k=-5. >>>More
The equation can be obtained by the properties of the proportional series: >>>More
Hehe, 16, I think I've used it in a computer.
Open the calculator and click to view - scientific. >>>More
Probably not, because the definition of an equation: an equation with unknowns is called an equation. An equation is one that "contains" unknowns, not "only" unknowns, and that should be an equation, not an equation.