At the beginning of man, nature is good. So why are twins born in the same family good and bad?

<> let's talk about why twins (or families with two children) in the same family environment, parents have the same educational philosophy, and education leads to children having different personalities. This is because children are competitive, or aggressive, and their goal is to steal their parents' love and attention in the first place. Families with two children of similar age can look at their two children, whose personalities are like a pair of antonyms:

Usually we can see a situation like this at the dinner table: "Brother eats fast, you see how fast brother eats. Or "My brother is not good, I have to be watched when I eat, my brother is much better" The child who is praised will think that it is an honor to hit the other person, and the child who is despised will always not be able to catch up with the other person due to physical and habitual reasons, and may give up and get attention in another way.

This alternative is based entirely on his own point of view that he doesn't win when he eats, doesn't win when he does something else, and he falls into a state of self-loathing and goes in a bad direction.

Twins are the most misunderstood, we think twins should be the same, but twins are also separate individuals, they are not conjoined twins. Twins don't grow at the same rate, maybe the older brother learns to speak first, the younger brother crawls first, and even the same thing is mastered at different speeds. This requires us not to always compare children, but to consciously guide their sense of competition.

Children's sense of competition is innate, this is the instinct of animals, immature parents point this competition to family members, mature parents guide their children's sense of competition in the right direction.

This actually stems from each person's personality, after all, twins also have their own unique personalities, and the family education received by two people will be different, which will lead to good and bad.

The development path is uneven, although they are twins, but the temperament is very different, and the psychological development after being influenced by the outside world is uneven.

This is because twins in a family are not in contact with different external things, so there is a difference between good and bad.

It is because of the original nature of human beings that twins are good and bad, which is the influence of acquired factors, which leads to the great difference in the personalities of twins.

Because even if a family looks exactly the same, they don't go through the same things. It is not only the family environment that affects a person, but also the social environment.

What's good and what's bad?

The sixth ancestor took advantage of the Ming Dynasty to Da Gengling, and when the ancestor saw Ming Zhi, he threw his mantle on Shi Shangyun: "This clothes show letters, can you strive for it?" Ren Jun will go! ”

Ming Sui raised it, like a mountain not moving, hesitated and said: "I came to seek the law, not for clothes." May the doers teach! ”

Zu Yun: "Don't think about good, don't think about evil, when is it right, which is the original face of the Ming Dynasty?" ”

Ming immediately realized, sweating all over his body, weeping tears and asking: "Shangye secret words and secret accidents, do you list intentions from time to time?" ”

Zu said: "I am now the one who speaks for you, that is, I am not a secret." If thou shalt look thy face again, but thou shalt be by thy side. ”

Mingyun: "Although a certain A is with the public in Huangmei, he really doesn't save his face. Today, Meng refers to the place of entry, such as people drinking water, knowing the warmth and cold, but today it is a certain master. ”

Zu Yun: "If you are like this, then I will be the same teacher as you Huangmei." Be self-supporting! ”

There is no door to say: The sixth ancestor can be said to be in a hurry, and his wife is anxious, for example, the new lychee has peeled off its shell, removed the core, and sent it to your mouth, as long as you swallow it.

Song said: If you can't paint it, you can't praise it.

There is nowhere to hide the original face, and the world is immortal when it is bad!

I'm sorry, I can't explain it, I can't express it, I hope you can have an answer after reading this paragraph.

Because to change from bad to good, it is necessary to pay, and it is difficult to get the affirmation of others; And from good to bad, you can do whatever you want, and you don't need to take into account other people's feelings.

At the beginning of human beings, the goodness of nature comes from the "Three Character Sutra".

The Three Character Classic is a traditional Chinese enlightenment textbook. Among the ancient Chinese classics, the "Three Character Classic" is one of the most simple and easy to read books. The "Three Character Classic" is based on allusions, including literature, history, philosophy, astronomy and geography, human ethics, loyalty, filial piety, and righteousness of traditional Chinese culture, and the core ideas include "benevolence, righteousness, sincerity, respect, and filial piety."

While reciting the "Three Character Classic", you will understand common sense, traditional Chinese culture and historical stories, as well as the principles of life and work in the connotation of the story.

Origin: Regarding the age of the writing of the "Three Character Classic" and the author's successive dynasties, most of the later generations of scholars tend to believe that "Mr. Wang Bohou of the Song Dynasty wrote the "Three Character Classic", that is, Wang Yinglin in order to better educate the children of his own clan to read, so he compiled a three-character song recipe that integrates the subset of the classics and history.

Wang Yinglin was a native of the Southern Song Dynasty, and the historical part of the original work of the "Three Character Classic" only ended in the Song Dynasty. With the development of history, in order to reflect the changes of the times, each dynasty has people to the "Three Character Classic" constantly supplemented, Qing Daoguang period He Xingsi added about the history of the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, a total of 24 sentences.

The beginning of man comes from the first sentence of the "Three Character Classic", "At the beginning of man, nature is good", and it is the only public reading material in China with marriage and childbirth as the main content. At the same time, it is also the name of four films.

It's in the Three Character Sutra. The beginning of man. Sex is good. Sexually similar. Xi is far away.

It was the Spring and Autumn Period that was put forward by thinkers, and it should be advocated by Confucianism!

Contrary to the later Legalist view that "human nature is inherently evil".

These two ideas have evolved to what today are the recipes for the Chilean state: the rule of virtue and the rule of law.

It was the experience of the ancients after thousands of years.

There must be a reason, otherwise we wouldn't know these two sentences, hehe.

This is mainly due to genetic and environmental influences, and people are born with the nature of grabbing food and playing, and they cannot distinguish between good and evil.

Human character is born after birth. Influenced by the acquired living environment. So education is very important. It is not said that being born can determine good or bad.

No one is born a bad person. It's in the nature of children to be naughty. Adults are the ones who decide children.

Good or bad is influenced by the environment! No such thing as a bad person is born!

A pile of wood, in winter, what else can be done but burn yourself or others? Selfish people not only do not give themselves, but they also hurt others.

Mencius said that human nature is inherently good, but Xunzi said that human nature is inherently evil, in fact, we look at the problem through the essence, everything has good and bad, but is human nature good or evil? I think it should be good. First of all, a bowl of water coming out of the well is usually pure, but if you add 1 fruit to her, it may turn into a carbonated drink, and if you put some sediment on him, it will become a bowl of muddy water.

I think human nature is this truth, what is a bad person and why is it good? First of all, culture is imperceptibly influenced, but if human nature is yes, he can't accept so much, so human nature is good.

At the beginning of man, nature is good. In my opinion, it is: the original nature of human beings.

Due to the different growth environment, there are high and low staggered. Therefore, those who gain power do not need to be rampant, and those who lose power do not have to feel sorry for themselves. The recent popular saying is:

If everyone could choose according to their own hearts when they were reincarnated, then the world would be roughly heaven. Because if they had a choice, most people would like to choose a good, abundant and bright future.

There are three states in the realm of man: ego, id, superego, when he is just born, he is in the state of ego, that is, everything is based on survival as the first priority, so he will cry when he is hungry, cry when he is uncomfortable, and he will take food when he sees it, because this is human instinct, how to survive. As I grew up and learned more about the social rules and the influence of my family, I began to enter the stage of self, that is, I understood the relationship between me and the country, between me and society, between me and my family, etc., and began to think about others and abide by the rules.

And the stage of the superego is the stage that can be understood as the stage of self-denial, the higher realm. So back to the previous question, at the beginning of human beings, is nature good? In the self-stage, it is difficult to confirm this statement, because if survival is the first priority, then many questions will be weakened, such as good or evil, according to the theory of stratification of needs, the human heart is good, so it can be understood that at the beginning of the person, the heart is good.

At the beginning of man, nature is good. The opening sentence in the "Three Character Classic", at the beginning of man, whether he agrees with this sentence or not, it depends on how to understand the meaning of this sentence, according to my personal understanding, at the beginning of man, nature is good. That is, in the beginning, that is, in childhood, people were not contaminated with red earthly benefits, and their human nature was good, why do you say that, because people do not have the ability to do evil in their childhood.

At the beginning of human beings, the nature of evil cannot form a society. Sex and affection are connected, and human nature and friendship are the first good. Therefore, I still agree that at the beginning of human beings, nature is good.

In the past, when I learned the truth that "at the beginning of man, nature is inherently good", I thought this sentence was particularly correct, but when I learned that "at the beginning of man, nature is inherently evil", I felt that this truth was also very well-founded. But I still believe that at the beginning, people are inherently good. A person should be born kind, but the education of the family or what happens around him will make a person make a mistake at the slightest thought.

People are actually still kind in their hearts, and if everyone in the world loved each other and coexisted peacefully, those bad things would not happen so much.

Do you believe it or not? Of course, I believe that people are born with a blank sheet of paper, and everything is kind, but after the big dye vat of this society, more and more people are not so kind, and they have their own character and temper, so I still believe that at the beginning of people, nature is good.

At the beginning of man, nature is good. When you see crowdfunding on Weibo, you will donate money according to your own conditions to help the help-seeker tide over the difficulties; When you encounter a child being abducted on the road, you don't watch him being taken alive. You will say that there are many moral issues such as whether or not to help them, but in fact, these things are just examples and do not represent the broad masses of the people.

Our society, which calls for positive energy, is still full of love, because this is human nature, and love is human instinct.

Human good and evil are relative concepts, so why should you delve into them? There is no absolute good and evil, and there is no standard for judging, if you must study, you should go to biology, maybe genes will have an impact on these things, because even if they are twins, the living environment is always the same, and there will still be a big difference, so it must have something to do with genes, and it must not be excreted from its influence. If you have studied politics, you should know that there is no concept of absolutes, and such an absolute view must be wrong.

This problem is really difficult to analyze from a psychological point of view, good and evil are not all formed in the day after tomorrow, heredity should be dominant, fundamentally speaking, this is not such a simple problem, there are many things involved, you can't just analyze it from a certain angle.

The theory of sexual goodness is Mencius's view, and the theory of sexual evil is Xunzi's view.

Mencius's theory of sexual goodness (the beginning of man, the nature is good) believes that everyone has compassion, shame, resignation, and the heart of right and wrong. The development of the child is to allow these pre-existing states of eruption to grow. Therefore, in education, attention should be paid to the influence of the educational content and the environment.

When all people are born, there is actually no difference, all are good, because it is conceivable that when a baby is in the mother's womb, there is always no possibility of some thinking activity about good and bad. As they grow up, their surroundings will determine some of her opinions and personalities. These surroundings of course also include education.

Because there is no difference between human beings and other animals in the later stages of life, but human beings will educate the next generation, and it is not good, but with some curiosity to contact external things, if the contact with things is good, it is good.

"At the beginning of man, nature is good" is itself a false statement!

I forgot the specific reason, but "at the beginning of man, nature is good" must be wrong!

It's in high school textbooks!!

Actually, we feel it ourselves"Good"It can be described with words such as quiet, peaceful, modest, tolerant, etc., and you can think about what these words can do to your heart.

All human beings are good by nature in the beginning. However, due to various reasons such as the acquired learning environment or education in the process of growing up, there is a difference between good and bad conduct.

In the beginning, human beings are good by nature. Such a kind nature is almost the same for everyone, but due to.

In the beginning, human beings are good by nature. Everyone has such a kind nature, but in the process of growing up, due to the acquired efforts, living environment and learning environment, there is a difference between good and bad conduct.

When man is first born, his nature is good.

Although the nature is very similar, the nature is also different according to the individual's preferences.