Why doesn t Bhutan establish diplomatic relations with China, and why doesn t Sudan establish diplom

Bhutan has Indian separatist organizations such as ULFA, India has deployed heavy troops along the India-Bhutan border, and the training and equipment of the Bhutanese army are provided by India, and the economy is heavily dependent on India. Bhutan has not yet established diplomatic relations with China, and in 1999 there were rumors that Bhutan was ready to establish diplomatic relations with China, and in the long run, Bhutan should also establish diplomatic relations with several other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Many Bhutanese see their country's attempt to establish diplomatic relations with China as a first step toward an independent foreign and security policy, but the presence of Indian separatist groups poses serious security concerns for India and is therefore premature.

As the saying goes, every family has a scripture that is difficult to read.

1.The background of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Sudan and China.

Sudan is a country located in northeastern Africa and has a close relationship with China. However, due to some policies and behaviors of Sudan**, relations between Sudan and China have gradually become strained.

2.Sudan**'s actions against China's judgment of Yu Nai.

In recent years, Sudan** has taken a number of actions against China. For example, Sudan** once expressed to Western countries that it was willing to establish closer relations with them, which in some ways posed a threat to China. In addition, Sudan** has also involved Chinese companies in some illegal activities, which has further exacerbated the contradictions between the two countries.

3.China's criticism of Sudan**.

China has criticized some of Sudan's actions. For example, China has publicly stated that Sudan should protect the safety of Chinese companies and Chinese citizens, and stop unduly interfering with Chinese companies. In addition, China** has also resolved differences between the two countries through dialogue and consultation with Sudan**.

4.Sudan** restrictions on Chinese companies.

Sudan** has also taken a number of measures to restrict the investment and business activities of Chinese companies in Sudan. For example, Sudan** requires Chinese companies to use Sudanese state-owned enterprises as distributors, which has a great impact on the profits and return on investment of Chinese companies. In addition, Sudan** has also imposed restrictive access policies for Chinese companies, making it difficult for Chinese companies to gain a foothold in the Sudanese market.

5.Economic cooperation between the two countries.

Despite the tensions between Sudan and China, economic cooperation between the two countries continues. According to the data, China is Sudan's second largest partner, and its main export products are cotton and cotton. In addition, Sudan is actively participating in China's Belt and Road Initiative, which helps to promote economic cooperation and cultural exchanges between the two countries.

6.Political changes between the two countries.

Sudan** has faced enormous challenges from domestic and international pressures amid the political changes in recent years. China** expressed concern over this and expressed its willingness to engage in dialogue and consultation with Sudan** in order to promote relations between the two countries.

7.Prospects for the future.

Despite some problems in relations between Sudan and China, economic cooperation and political exchanges between the two countries continue. In the future, with the dialogue and consultation between China and the Soviet Union, the relations between the two countries are expected to be improved. At the same time, economic cooperation and cultural exchanges between the two countries will be further strengthened to jointly promote the development of the two countries.

It was India that refused to allow him to establish diplomatic relations with our country.

Bhutan's strategic self-status is very important and is considered a strategic buffer zone between China and India. Bhutan is vital to India's security. India has long opposed the influence of countries like China in Bhutan.

Bhutan has always been India's closest and staunchest ally, and the two countries have close political, military and diplomatic ties.

In addition to having a large military presence in Bhutan, India has built two large hydropower stations for Bhutan, which account for 30% of Bhutan's national budget each year. Bhutan has to take into account India's position out of its national interests, and to some extent is deeply influenced by India's policies.

Bhutan has not only not established diplomatic relations with China, but also with countries other than India.

To be clear, not only diplomacy is guided by India!

Therefore, on the whole, the problem of Bhutan not establishing diplomatic relations with China is multifaceted and cannot be resolved in a short period of time. However, with China's comprehensive strength and international influence increasing, the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Bhutto is not a big issue.

Because in 1949, Bhutan and India signed the "Treaty of Perpetual Peace and Friendship", the main content of which was that Bhutan should accept India's guidance in internal and foreign affairs, and India began to intervene in Bhutan, so China has been unable to establish diplomatic relations with this country, which was once a territory and vassal state of China. But the relationship is quite friendly.

After Bhutan's independence, Bhutan signed the Treaty of Perpetual Peace and Friendship with India in 1949, which mainly focused on Bhutan's internal and foreign affairs under India's guidance, which directly led to the inability of China to establish diplomatic relations with Bhutan.

Because Bhutan had asked to return to our country and become a city of our country, but my country did not accept it, so Bhutan unilaterally felt that he was still our territory and did not need to establish diplomatic relations.