The child was bitten by a dog but the owner avoided it, was he unwilling to take responsibility or d

The child was bitten by a dog, but the dog owner avoided it, because he was unwilling to take responsibility, because of the economic losses brought by his pet, it was the last thing the pet owner wanted to see, and he did not want to pay for his pet.

It's just trying to evade responsibility. Thinking that after avoiding it, the child's parents can only stop it. As everyone knows, the escape will be more serious in this way.

This kind of thing may also exist, because the child was bitten by a dog when passing by, maybe the owner's house was not there at that time also makes sense, if the owner sees the child bitten by the dog and does not care, then this is the owner is not responsible, if the child is bitten by the dog and does not see the owner, the child's parents can go to the master's house to reason, and the responsibility is also the owner's responsibility.

I think it should be evading responsibility, can I not know if I was bitten by a dog, I don't want to compensate, in fact, this has to be faced, don't escape, raise a dog to be conscious, and be responsible for accidents.

I think it's still dog owners who don't want to take responsibility. Because many dog owners let their dogs go, they don't want to take responsibility.

The dog, as the property of the dog owner, has a management obligation to the dog. If the animal you raise causes damage to your fracture due to careless management, the owner or manager of the dog shall bear tort liability. In this case, the dog owner has an excuse from liability, and if you are intentional or grossly negligent in the occurrence of damage, the other party can not be liable or be mitigated.

3.In the following two cases, the other party is fully liable and there is no excuse for liability: first, the violation of management regulations and the failure to take safety measures for the animal cause damage to others.

For example, there is no leash, etc. Second, the dog is a dangerous animal such as a fierce dog that is prohibited from being raised, causing damage to others. 4.

Your friend should be compensated: medical expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, and other reasonable expenses incurred for ** and **, as well as loss of income due to lost work. If the disability is caused by early shouting, compensation shall also be made for the cost of disability living aids and disability compensation.

If death is caused, funeral expenses and death compensation shall also be compensated. 5.If the other party refuses to compensate, your friend can sue in accordance with the law.

Summary. Hello. Such dog owners are not responsible.

Because people's dogs are tied up, they don't let go casually. In this case, you go to play with the dog without the owner's permission. After being bitten by a dog, the owner of the dog is not responsible for anything.

If a child is bitten by a leashed dog, is the dog owner fully responsible?

Hello. Such dog owners are not responsible. Because people's dogs are tied up, they don't let go casually. In this case, you go to play with the dog without the owner's permission. After being bitten by a dog, the owner of the dog is not responsible for anything.

The dog didn't move. The child came running and was bitten by a dog. How much responsibility the dog owner bears.

This is irresponsible.

Because the owner of the dog is on a leash.

The dog owner didn't move. The child runs from behind the dog owner. Bitten by a dog. Responsible.

Not responsible. Because the owner of the dog has a rope. Normal people will avoid dogs. Those who take the initiative to walk next to the dog and get bitten are not responsible.

There are many folk songs. I want to see it.

This is not a civil law.

It's basic common sense.

If the dog owner is not on a leash, he is fully responsible.

Because we're going to follow the law.

In that case, you can just go to a lawyer.

A lawyer will tell you how to do it.

The police station mediated that the other party did not agree.

Then you can just go to a lawyer. If you want to go to court, go directly to a lawyer, and the lawyer will be fully responsible.

If a child is bitten by a leashed dog, is the dog owner fully responsible?

There is no need to be fully responsible, because the dog owner has already kept the dog on a leash, the child's parents have the obligation to supervise the child, and the dog owner and the child's parents are responsible for the child's bitten by the leashed dog.

Summary. Legal basis: Article 78 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that if a raised animal causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability, but if it can be proved that the damage was caused by the infringed party's intention or gross negligence, the liability may not be borne or reduced.

Article 79: Where management regulations are violated by failing to take safety measures for animals and causing harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability. Article 80: Where dangerous animals such as fierce dogs that are prohibited from being raised cause harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability.

The child provokes the dog to be bitten + whose responsibility.

Dear, hello, the child provokes the mountain cheating dog bitten + the responsibility of the owner of the dog. In general, the owner of the dog is liable for the damages, but if it can be proved that the damage was caused by the child's intention or gross negligence, the child is at fault, and the responsibility of the dog owner can be reduced or exempted.

Legal basis: Article 78 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that if a raised animal causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability, but if it can be proved that the damage is caused intentionally or by gross negligence of the infringed party, the liability may be mitigated. Article 79: Where management regulations are violated by failing to take safety measures for animals and causing harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability.

Article 80: Where wild springs caused harm to others by fierce dogs and other dangerous animals that are prohibited from being raised, the animal keepers or managers shall bear tort liability.