Lu Zongyao: What is the simplest philosophical knowledge?

I am also an essentialist, but not a metaphysical essentialist, a dialectical materialist essentialist, once a society is formed, it must have its own philosophical system, such as empiricism, metaphysical materialism, dialectical materialism, etc., all of which exist objectively, and will not change because of whether a philosopher generalizes abstraction, the material existence of society and the philosophical system are directly identical, that is, the people who make up social relations are directly assimilated and influenced by philosophical ideas at a certain place and time, and there is no philosophical system at that timeThere is no one in the society, this kind of person may be ancient people, primitive people, feudal slave society people, because the existence of philosophical dialectics in society, so when no one seeks to generalize him, he is silently influencing the production of human beings, this is the simplest and most direct philosophy, the philosophy that does not need to be actively learned.

The simple philosophy you mentioned refers to the laws of change in the objective world summarized by philosophers and politicians, and the theory that exists in the form of words, this kind of theory requires people to take the initiative to learn, and the philosophy of active learning is of course not as simple as the philosophy of passive learning. Active learning always requires students to memorize, as long as the things that are memorized must not be vivid and vivid, otherwise there is no need for active memory.

Keep philosophy simple.

It is necessary to move from practice to theory!

To learn theories, we must start with Ma Zhe's materialist dialectic!

Philosophy really isn't that hard!

I belong to the half tank of water that I don't understand but understand.

But since I can teach myself a little bit to get started.

Then the landlord's students can also use this methodology!

Doctrine on worldview.

Development is an eternal, initial topic.

It is generally believed that the popularization of knowledge lies in its practicality. The knowledge that everyone uses all the time is very popular. Is this a brainstorming turn?

The most difficult philosophical knowledge that everyone uses all the time is what philosophy is, and what is the use of studying philosophy still bothers many people.

Philosophy is summed up from practice, not invented, and even people who have not studied it are actually unconsciously applying philosophy, but they don't know it.

First of course, with a simple philosophy.

How significant is it to prioritize?

My point of view is that philosophy first, then philosophy, a person can only do things that he feels have values when he has values, and philosophy first may be controlled by others or may be understood by himself.

Thinking and accumulation must be correct, thinking is accumulating one's own thoughts to make them a consistent proposition, and accumulation is making theoretical preparations for in-depth thinking. I think your bottleneck is that you don't have enough knowledge in some aspects, but when your knowledge accumulates to a certain extent, it's like a volcano's magma chamber will gush out sparks of thought.

The two sides of the contradiction are interdependent and inseparable! At the same time, the point of view of connection cannot be separated!