Can the addition of 2 gates in the zoo breeding farm really make a difference?

I think that after the leopard incident, the latest protection of Hangzhou Wildlife Park is still safe and reliable, it is understood that the area has added a double double post face recognition system, and you need to pass through to reach the area. The two new gates are also required to be opened by two staff members with face recognition, and the protective power grid has been added to the entire park, which can be said to have added a lot of protection means on the basis of the original protection.

I think that after the leopard incident, the zoo did do a lot of new means of protection, the occurrence of this incident to the entire zoo brought a lot of passivity, but also sounded a great alarm, the whole zoo up and down to realize how harmful this matter is, in the daily work in the park management has really made a lot of effort, through the new addition of various protective measures, face recognition can be seen the park for the leopard escape brought by the harm, awareness has been reached, These measures can help the management of the park to a large extent, and after this incident, the management measures of the zoo are very tough, and I do not think that such problems will occur in the future management practice. <>

First, I think two gates are very necessary.

I learned that the opening of these two gates is very complicated, and it requires two staff members to open through facial recognition, and at the same time, a lot of surveillance has been added around these two gates, and it is also observed 24 hours a day**, which largely prevents the leopard from escaping again. <>

Second, this warning is very, very large.

I think that after the escape of the leopard, the management of the entire park has brought a great alarm, the whole park has a lot of cost and effort in the management, the park monitoring and protection can be described as foolproof, I believe that the escape of the leopard has brought a great warning to the entire park, and the park will never take it lightly again in the follow-up management process, such a problem arises. <>

3. The leopard fled, and the people involved have been sentenced.

I learned that the management personnel involved in the escape of the leopard have been recognized by the state as a major liability accident, and the local court has sentenced these people, hoping that after these people experience this incident, they can be vigilant, take responsibility in their future work, and stop being so careless.

If the first door is not blocked, the second door will also work, allowing the staff to catch these escaped animals in a very short time.

I learned that the opening of these two gates is very complicated, and it requires two staff members to open through facial recognition, and at the same time, a lot of surveillance has been added around these two gates, and it is also observed 24 hours a day**, which largely prevents the leopard from escaping again.

I think the addition of two gates to this zoo is indeed an effective way to prevent leopards from escaping. Because after he added two gates, he needed to open them one by one. In this way, as long as the door is opened according to the rules, then the animals in the zoo will not escape.

After this incident, the management of the zoo will also be alarmed, and they will pay more attention to this safety issue.

With the addition of two gates, I think it would be very effective in preventing the leopards from escaping. When he got to the gate, he had to close the second lane after he entered the first lane. After the building reaches the second level, you need to close the second lane.

And then when he wants to come out, it will be the same, which can effectively prevent the leopard from sneaking out. <>

Just from the gate level, it can effectively prevent the leopard from escaping, and Bi and the management of the zoo will also be very careful. Because of such an incident earlier, the first few layers of the tube skin have been sent to prison. They must also be very afraid that this will happen to them, so they will be very careful.

As long as the management can be careful not to make such mistakes, the probability that the leopard will be able to run out will not be high. <>

A total of three leopards escaped from the Hangzhou Zoo before, two were recovered later, and one still has not been found. I don't think the leopard that I can't find is very likely to have died outside. Because of that leopard, he was also born in a zoo since he was a child, and he has never tried to hunt alone in the wild, and he has no relevant experience.

And the leopard born in the wild, he will have his mother teach him to hunt. Therefore, if this leopard goes outside, there is a high probability that he will not be able to find food, and he will most likely starve to death outside.

After reading it, remember to like + follow + collect.

Yes, this prevents the leopard from escaping, it also avoids accidents, and it can also limit the leopard's range of movement.

Absolutely. Because these two gates are very heavy, and ordinary people can't open them at all, they can prevent leopards from escaping.

OK. This will strengthen the zoo's security measures and prevent the leopards from escaping to a certain extent.

In this case of the escape of the leopard, the relevant personnel have already been sentenced. The gate was added to prevent the leopard from escaping again. For safety.

Because the zoo had escaped due to the negligence of the keepers, the gate was added to prevent something like this from happening.

The reason for the addition of two gates is to prevent animals from escaping, and there have been cases of animals being lost in the early stage, so more gates are now set up for safety reasons.

After the cover-up, all six of those responsible have been imprisoned. This kind of thing rarely happens, and it is undoubtedly a wake-up call for zoo managers. So now the Hangzhou Zoo has re-set two gates to prevent the animals from escaping.

I think that the addition of two gates is a very good way to do this. In this way, it is much more difficult for animals to escape, and it is more convenient for people to manage.

If it is just a gate, then if the gate is forgotten to close, it is likely to cause the animals to escape. But if two gates are set up, the probability that he will forget to close them will be relatively small. And if the position of the two gates is staggered, then even if you run out of the first gate, you may not recognize the road and can run outside.

So I think the gate will have a better effect. <>

And after this incident, the staff and management of this zoo must have felt the blow. I believe that his leaders will also make a strict reflection on this matter, and they should not make the same mistake again in the future. Because they already know the disastrous consequences of making mistakes, they certainly don't let themselves make such a big mistake just for the sake of being lazy.

I believe that Hangzhou Zoo will do better than all other zoos in the future. <>

If something happens to Hangzhou Zoo, not only Hangzhou Zoo will cause vigilance, but all other zoos will cause vigilance, which can play a role in shocking the tiger. Therefore, this incident has a great significance for zoos across the country, allowing them to understand the danger of animal escape. It also made them understand what kind of consequences they need to bear if they are not responsible and choose to conceal it.

After reading it, remember to like + follow + collect.

I think it should be effective, the gate can effectively prevent animals from running out, and it can also prevent people from coming in.

I don't think it's effective, and the most effective way is for the staff to strengthen management and patrol more.

It works, and this setting can better manage those animals, making it more difficult for those animals to get out.

It's very effective, so that the animals can be better managed, and those animals will not run out, and they can be better safe.

I think it's useful for them to add these gates, because after adding two gates, it's much more complicated to get out of this place for animals like this, and it's not easy to escape. After this incident, I am sure they will never make the same mistake again. It's not easy to make this mistake in itself, and with this incident, I'm sure they'll do a good job.

This incident is like a ** for the entire industry, waking up every zoo of them.

With the addition of two gates, it is not easy for the staff to forget when they enter and exit the place. Because there are two gates, it will be very difficult for the animals inside to get out. So two gates are definitely useful, and they will be very useful.

Even if one of the gates in the outer or inner layer forgets to close the chain celery stall, this can effectively prevent the animal from escaping. <>

This time, the six relevant responsible persons were all imprisoned, and the main reason for their imprisonment was not the escape of the animal, but the failure to report the animal in time after the escape. I believe that the new management will be able to deeply understand this problem, and in case of an accident in the future, they will also know what to do to do the right thing. So I think this management may understand this truth better than the management of other zoos.

This time the incident is like a ** for the entire industry. I must have never thought that I would let the animals go away and go to jail. It was because I didn't know that there would be such serious consequences that I would do this.

Otherwise, who would take such a big risk and risk going to jail for the sake of a little reputation for the zoo? And the exodus of the zoo's animals may not affect his business. Because people go to zoos just to see animals, as long as your animals don't come out to bite me when I'm looking, that's none of my business.

After reading it, remember to like + follow + collect.

It has a function, such a gate can better protect the animals from running out, so that those animals can live in peace, and the effect is very great.

It is useful, which can protect the animals and also prevent the animals from escaping from the park, which is good for the people.

I think it's useful to increase the protection and increase the resistance of the animal to escape.