Is there a relationship between a stray dog hurting a person and a feeder?

Stray dogs hurt people and feeders have a relationship, because stray dogs hurt people, it itself is a very normal phenomenon, but as a feeder should be supervised in time.

I don't think there is a connection between stray dogs hurting people and feeding people. Because after all, the sheep is just to give him some food, but he doesn't play a role in educating him, I don't think it's okay.

It doesn't matter, I feel that the traffic dog hurts people is a problem of stray dogs, and the feeder does not have any responsibility, just provide some food to it.

I don't think stray dogs hurt people and feeders are particularly related, because stray dogs are inherently aggressive.

If you can adopt, you will adopt. If you can't adopt, don't feed it at will!

In the case of ownerless stray dogs, the fixed feeder is the de facto owner of the dog. The law recognizes fixed feeding as the same as keeping the dog free-range! Feeding stray dogs will not only make stray dogs stay in the demarcated territory for a long time, causing safety hazards to others; It will also allow the unneutered stray dogs to have the energy to breed the next batch after they are full of food and drink, which is also the law of animal reproduction in nature.

So, don't feel aggrieved by the feeder.

Managers of public places such as hotels, shopping malls, stations, and entertainment venues who fail to fulfill their safety and security obligations and cause stray dogs to injure people shall also be held liable.

I think that in the daily life of those stray dog injuries incidents, these stray dogs and the feeder have a certain relationship.

Feeding is de facto free-range, especially if your feeding allows stray dogs to live in a fixed place somewhere. You and the other feeders form the free-range owner of the dog. Since you are the master, you must restrain it, manage it, educate it, and you don't do this, so should you be responsible for it hurting people?

Of course, you can prove that other free-range people can share. (The highest level of the food chain is different from other lower animals and objects, people are equal, people cannot become the owner of the homeless, even if it is a street child, you have to complete a certain adoption procedure to become its guardian.) ）

I think stray dogs hurt people and feeders are related, because stray dogs belong to him now, anyway.

There must be a relationship. If you don't feed the dogs. Dogs have the strength to bite there.

I think stray dogs hurt people and feed a lot of people, dogs are spiritual, and after being abandoned, they will hate humans and have a strong sense of self-protection, thus hurting humans.

If a stray dog hurts someone, I don't think it has much to do with the flyer, after all, he is a stray dog and has no owner, and he can't find an owner.

Matter. Because feeding will make stray dogs gather.

Legally related, but in practice ......Anyway, I won't admit it after biting! I am also complacent that I have done a good deed!

Since it is a stray dog, it must be centrally managed by a special department, and you are responsible for feeding others if you don't feed them, and the dog bites people.

Regular feeding has a relationship with the formation of feeding conditions.

Feeders are criminally liable.

Long-term feeding and feeding can legally be regarded as the actual keeper. There are already such jurisprudence.

The law clearly stipulates that the long-term feeder of the dog is legally responsible for the dog injuring people.

If you want to feed a stray dog, you can adopt it.

Rescuing stray dogs is perpetuating their biting dog life. Say it doesn't matter? You have a hole in your thinking, right?

Legal Analysis: Feeders are generally required to pay compensation. Where the raised animal causes harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability, but if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may not be borne or mitigated.

Legal basis: Article 1245 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Where a raised animal causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may be waived or mitigated.

Feeding stray dogs to hurt people is generally the responsibility of the feeder. This is because, based on the theory of causeless management, the feeder should perform the same management responsibilities as the owner or manager of the animal. If it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may be waived or mitigated.

1. There are several ways to deal with being bitten by a dog.

There are several ways to deal with being bitten by a dog:

1. If the animal is bitten, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringer, the liability may not be borne or mitigated;

2. If the animal keeper or manager is bitten by a fierce dog, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability;

3. If a dog is bitten by a zoo dog, the zoo shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the performance of management duties can be proved, it does not bear tort liability;

4. If a dog is bitten by an abandoned or escaped dog, the original keeper or manager of the animal shall bear the tort liability, and if the dog is bitten by a third party due to the fault of a third party, the infringer may claim compensation from the animal keeper or manager or a third party, and the animal keeper or manager shall have the right to recover compensation from the third party after compensation.

2. Walking the dog without a leash, biting or causing injury to others, the dog owner.

If the dog is not leashed, bites or causes injury to others, the dog owner shall be liable for compensation. Where raised animals cause harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability. However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may be waived or mitigated.

However, if a passer-by deliberately teases the dog and causes the dog to be bitten, it means that the infringed party, that is, the passer-by, is at fault, then the manager of the dog can not be held liable or reduce the liability.

3. How to determine the criteria for determining the liability for damage caused by raising animals.

If the raising of animals causes damage to the lawful rights and interests of others, the civil liability shall be determined in accordance with the following provisions: if the raised animals cause damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may be waived or mitigated.

Article 1245 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

Where raised animals cause harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability. However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may be waived or mitigated.

Article 1246.

Where management provisions are violated and safety measures are not taken for animals, causing damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the damage was intentionally caused by the infringed party, the liability can be mitigated.

It is the manager of stray dogs.

The original owner or manager of the stray dog is responsible for the bite of a stray dog, but after a stray dog is abandoned, it is in fact difficult to find the original owner. If you feed stray animals for many years and let them move and stay, it has already constituted a special breeding relationship and has been transformed into de facto adoption.

Article 1245 of the Civil Code provides that if a raised animal causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may be waived or mitigated.

Article 1249 of the Civil Code provides that if an abandoned or escaped animal causes damage to others during the period of abandonment or escape, the original keeper or manager of the animal shall bear tort liability.