What is the difference between the 600M in XP and the lite version.

No, there is not much difference between the two, and it is no problem to install XP-SP3 698MB.

Streamlining depends on how much it is streamlined, such as streamlining only certain functions that we don't normally use, etc.

In addition, I tell you that the need for patching does not mean that the system is streamlined, because the patches developed by Microsoft are to make the system more perfect, and there are no vulnerabilities to prevent viruses or Trojans, which is the real reason why the system is constantly updated.

The pure version is the original XP system without any deletions.

The Lite version is a streamlining of some system services and components that are not commonly used.

If the machine is not very bad, it is still recommended to do the original system. Relatively stable.

Pure version: Basically do not install any application software, and keep the original version.

Lite version: the pursuit of fast speed, high efficiency, small installation, some of the original version of the unused and unwanted programs are removed, stability and function may be affected.

It is recommended to use the Deep Lite version.

I'm using the Deep Lite version.

It is recommended that you use it.

The original XP version is relatively stable to use.

No modifications have been made. Hehe.

I think that the Deep Lite version or the XP original system can be installed.

If the computer performance is better, install the original version.

The lite version removes a lot of things.

Deep Lite is actually another version of XP.

The version made by the deep forum itself.

There are also well-known forums such as Tomato.

The original XP version is relatively more stable than the revised version.

Depending on your system configuration, if the configuration is not high, use the lite version and the deep lite version.

Generally, it is better to use the original version.

None of them are good, the original version is the best, although it has been stable for a long time, and it is better than anything else.

The lite version closes some components that are not commonly used by users, which can save resources and space.

For example, the services in the first service, such as printers, help, remote, etc., these services are not needed by our general users, and opening these services is not conducive to the security of their computers!

Be. The 600M one costs more CPU and memory than the 200M one. But 200M is lacking in functions.,It's basically a piece of chicken ribs.,Streamlined to such a point, I really don't know what other functions there are.,Even win98 is not as good。 What is the use of it?

No, the lite version does not mean that the functions are missing, the lite version is further developed by the system developers for some better systems, so that more models can be used, you can go and see, there are many powerful XP lite systems in it.

The problem is not in the features, for home PCs, quite a few of the features of Windows XP are useless.

But you remove some of the bricks, destroying the integrity and directly affecting the stability of the system.

It is still the original version, stable and easy to use.

The Lite version is a system that streamlines unnecessary or unnecessary files from the system, and the system is small but retains its main functionality. It doesn't have much impact on us.

Removed a lot of functions that are rarely used in ordinary use, and basically does not affect normal operation.

The XP system does not require much hard disk space, so why install a lite version?

There are many in-depth lite versions of the system, many of which come from the installed version. If it is marked as Ghost XP, it is encapsulated with Ghost, that is, Ghost will be used during installation, which will be faster. The latter method is more common, while the installed version is mostly the original version.

In fact, there is not much difference, mainly depending on the producer's configuration.