Finding the principle, the impossible triangle, try to discuss the impossible triangle

What's going on?!

In fact, it is not the figure itself that causes the "impossible shape", but your three-dimensional perceptual system of the figure, which is forced to act when you perceive the three-dimensional mental model of the figure. When perceiving a two-dimensional flat figure into a three-dimensional mental figure, the mechanism that performs this process can greatly affect your visual system.

It is under the influence of this enforcement mechanism that your visual system gives depth to every point in the graphic. In other words, some of the two-dimensional structural elements of an image correspond to some of the structural elements of your three-dimensional perceptual interpretation system. A two-dimensional straight line is interpreted as a three-dimensional straight line.

A two-dimensional plane is interpreted as a three-dimensional plane. In perspective images, both acute and obtuse angles are interpreted as 90° angles. The outer line segment is seen as the dividing line of the profile profile.

This form dividing line plays an important role in defining the outline of the entire mental image. This shows that, in the absence of information to the contrary, your visual system always assumes that you are viewing things from a primary perspective.

Each vertex corner of the triangle creates perspective, three 90° angles, and the distance of each side varies differently. Combining the three vertex corners into a whole creates a spatially impossible figure.

The hypotenuse of these two triangles is not in a straight line. The slope of the 2 compulsory lectures in high school can be calculated. According to the side length of a square is 1, the acute angle of the red triangle is 3/8 of the tan value, and the green triangle is 2/5 of the tan value, and the two tan values are not equal, so the two sides are not in the same straight line.

That is, the hypotenuse of the first figure is concave downward, and the hypotenuse of the second figure is convex. In the final analysis, these are two "triangles" with arcs, deceived by their own eyes.

Solution: Suppose this diagram is reasonable so that the three rods on the way are a b c and they are two perpendicular to each other a b a c that is a plane formed by a perpendicular b and c a does not belong to the plane formed by b and c However, the two points on a, that is, the intersection of a and b, the intersection of a and c are in the plane composed of b and c, and the result of a is contradictory to the plane of b and c This diagram is unreasonable.

1. The concept of impossible trigonometry.

Impossible trigonometry theory is a classical concept that refers to a triangle in which the length of the three sides is 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the sum of the three interior angles is 180 degrees. Such a triangle is considered impossible because the sum of its three interior angles is greater than 180 degrees, which is a fundamental theorem in geometry.

2. The authenticity of the impossible trigonometry theory.

The veracity of the impossible triangle theory has been a controversial topic, with some arguing that it is true and others arguing that it is impossible. In fact, the truth of the impossible trigonometric theory depends on the geometric system you use. In Euclidean geometry, the theory of impossible trigonometry is impossible to exist because the sum of its three interior angles is greater than 180 degrees, whereas in topological geometry, the theory of impossible trigonometry is possible because the sum of its three interior angles can be less than 180 degrees.

2. The corollary of the impossible trigonometry theory.

1. Corollaries of the impossible trigonometry theory.

The corollary of the theory of possible triangles is that if the lengths of the three sides of a triangle are 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the sum of the three interior angles is 180 degrees, then the triangle cannot exist. This is a classical corollary that states that in Euclidean geometry the impossible trigonometric theory cannot exist because the sum of its three interior angles is greater than 180 degrees.

2. The enlightenment of the impossible trigonometry theory.

The implication of the impossible trigonometric theory is that in Euclidean geometry, the impossible trigonometric theory cannot exist because the sum of its three internal angles is greater than 180 degrees. This revelation reminds us that in geometry, there are some things that cannot exist, and even if they seem simple, they cannot be ignored.

III. Conclusion. As can be seen from the above discussion, the truth of the impossible trigonometric theory depends on the geometric system you use, in Euclidean geometry, the impossible trigonometric theory is not possible, whereas in topological geometry, the impossible trigonometric theory is possible. In addition, the inferences and revelations of the impossible trigonometry theory also remind us that in geometry, there are some things that cannot exist, even if they seem simple, cannot be ignored.

Therefore, we should study geometry carefully in order to better understand its laws and principles.

The purpose of this article is to introduce the authenticity of impossible trigonometry theory, its inferences, and its implications, thus reminding us that in geometry, some things cannot exist, even if they seem simple, they cannot be ignored. Therefore, we should study geometry carefully in order to better understand its laws and the principle of hunger.

The "impossible triangle" refers to the fact that economic, social, fiscal and financial policy goals are faced with many difficulties, and it is difficult to obtain three goals at the same time. In terms of monetary policy, free capital flows, exchange rate stability and monetary policy independence cannot be combined.

The "impossible triangle" means that it is impossible for a country to achieve free capital flows, independence of monetary policy and stability of exchange rates at the same time. That is, a country can only have two of them, not three. If a country wants to allow capital flows and requires an independent monetary policy, it will be difficult to maintain exchange rate stability.

If exchange rate stability and capital flows are to be desired, independent monetary policy must be abandoned.

For the Mundell-Fleming model or the "incompatible trinity" to be established, two most important conditions must be met:

That. First, monetary policy must be independent of fiscal policy, that is, the two must be independent monetary policy tools.

That. Second, the country must have a well-developed capital market and money market, and domestic individuals and enterprises can use their own currencies to carry out international lending and exchange rate risk hedging.

For example, an angle is a triangle of 190 degrees (principle: the sum of the three inner angles of a triangle is 180 degrees, so any angle must be less than 180 degrees).

For example, the length of the three sides is a triangle (principle: the sum of any two sides of a triangle is definitely greater than the third side).

For example, in a triangle with three sides of each length, the angle of the side of length 9 is smaller than the angle of the side length of 7 (principle, the big side is against the big angle, so the angle of the side of length 9 must be how many degrees larger than the angle of the side of length 7).

There are many more, anyway, just find some triangles that are contrary to some basic concepts such as axioms, principles, and theorems of triangles.