-
I think it's okay, people say that it's short and capable, so if the body size becomes smaller, a lot of transportation and buildings will be made smaller, so that a lot of space will be saved, and then the food we eat and the water we drink will be significantly reduced, and the IQ will remain the same as now.
-
If humanity were ten times smaller and the IQ remained the same, I think it would be possible to rule the planet, because the human intellect is there, and it can invent a lot of things to replace itself.
-
I think it's quite difficult to see a 10-fold reduction in size and the same IQ, because if the size of a human being is reduced by 10 times, it's like an ant, and it's harder to do anything.
-
Yes, because people live on this earth by wisdom, not by height As long as people's wisdom continues, people will always progress, and if they keep progressing, they will always rule the earth.
-
If the size of human beings is reduced tenfold, but their IQ remains the same, it will still be difficult to rule the earth, because at this time, the bodies of some beasts are already larger than my human beings. So it is quite possible that it is the beast that rules the earth.
-
<>In my opinion, the ability to rule the earth does not depend on the size of human beings, nor on intelligence, but also on the environment of the planet. That's right, it's not up to people to decide who rules the planet. The development cycle of the planet is measured in hundreds of millions of years, and the history of man is a moment for the earth.
The global environment does not change with anyone's will. To rule the earth is to defeat other creatures that humans can see, but are these dominated by humans? It is generally believed that humans have conquered other living beings.
In fact, human beings have changed the earth's environment, and other creatures have died out because they have not adapted, such as ancient creatures such as dinosaurs, and their extinction has nothing to do with people, I think in the final analysis, the environment has changed. Even if human beings have changed dramatically in tens of thousands of years, whether modern people go back to the past or ancient people are in modern times, they will die out in an instant. On the same Earth as it is now, the small closed island of India has been isolated from the rest of the world, and they landed in civilized society and died quickly because of the environment.
Let's talk about human beings, there is a saying that the use of nuclear ** will destroy the earth, but in fact it is impossible, not to mention that the earth and even asteroids can't handle it. The use of nuclear ** to destroy is only the earth's adaptation to the environment of human existence, resulting in the extinction of human beings, the earth is still there, and there will naturally be other creatures different from human beings, but human beings will not know. In short, don't think about domination, be careful not to make the earth's environment unsuitable for human existence, and we can't do anything about the rest of the cosmic changes.
Don't come nonsense, and then pray that the earth will not change drastically, is the right solution for our survival. This is small for us relative to the object. For example, we are big relative to ants and small to elephants.
So, relative to the object, it depends on the size of the object.
We are so small relative to the earth, and even smaller than the universe. Therefore, the ruler is not just by the size of the object, but more by the IQ and the mind. Elephants are bigger than us, so why don't they dominate the world?
There are many animals that are much smaller than us, why don't they dominate the world. It can't be said that if we are like ants and can rule the world with a worrying IQ, then is there anything higher than our IQ. Ants also have their own architecture, their own culture, and so on.
So, you have to say that if we are as big as ants, we will be able to dominate the world. Can you be sure that ants don't have the same IQ as humans, even if we're as big as ants, and there is no animal with a better IQ than humans.
-
Humanity's ability to rule the earth is based on wisdom. Because humans are the most intelligent creatures on the planet, and they are very powerful. If the size of the body becomes smaller, human beings will not be able to rule the earth.
Because some animals are very large in size, humans become smaller and may be eaten by other animals.
-
Indeed, this is based on wisdom, human ability and human co-ordination, and it is also inseparable from human development. If the size of the person becomes smaller, then it is impossible to rule the earth. Sedan branches.
-
I think that the main reason why humans can rule the earth is because of intelligence, and if the size becomes smaller and the wisdom does not change, humans can still rule the earth.
-
I don't think humans can rule the earth just because of intelligence, and I don't think humans can rule the earth if it gets smaller.
-
My idea is that if humans shrank 100 times, it would be very difficult for humans to rule the planet.
First of all, human beings rule the world, body size is a very important and crucial part, walking upright is visually making people taller, avoiding the direct attack of most beasts, so that human ancestors survived in the primitive society and continue to this day. Some people may say that size is not the decisive factor, because even the dinosaurs, who are hundreds of times larger than us, will eventually be doomed to extinction. But it's not just the body size that's 100 times smaller, it's also the thing we're most proud of as human beings, our minds.
Human development has so far become the hegemon of the earth more rely on teamwork, resource sharing, and scientific and technological development. The size of the human brain, which is 100 times smaller, is greatly reduced, and it is difficult to achieve higher achievements in science and technology and cooperation.
When the size of human beings shrinks, some people may think that the space for resource development has greatly increased, solving the problems of resource shortage and land crowding, but when human beings shrink, we may no longer be able to effectively use the existing resources.
What do you think?
-
As we all know, human beings have survived on the earth for millions of years, and in these millions of years, human beings have evolved step by step into today's highly intelligent civilization through wisdom and cooperation. After tens of thousands of years of evolution, human beings have freed their hands by walking upright, and gradually mastered the manufacturing tools, only after millions of years of exploration and development, human beings are now the highest creatures on the earth, developed intelligent civilization, and also stood at the top of the food chain, dominating the earth. So have you ever considered the question, if humanity were reduced by a hundred times, would it still be the same as it is now?
The height of human beings, who have been reduced by a hundred times without worrying about eating and drinking, will drop from the average meter to only a centimeter, and this size of human beings can be said to be smaller than bees, if human wisdom is still there, then we can still build a small intelligent civilization, but everything that human beings have created before will have to be reversed, and we will lose everything we have. But the size of the body is reduced by a hundred times, at least it also indicates that our food and living space will be more abundant, and we will no longer worry about food, because at this time, a grain of rice is enough for a family to eat for a day, and water should not be worried, because a drop of rain is enough for us to drink for a long time. Meat may not be enjoyable, because at that time, the meat we often ate such as cows, chickens, ducks, fish, sheep and pigs was in front of us, just like the monsters in Ultraman seeing the small earthlings.
Human beings are reduced by a hundred times, so from the original no natural enemies almost to all natural enemies, even cute and docile kittens and dogs are difficult to fight, because in their eyes, we are enough to be trampled on by one foot, not to mention fierce beasts such as lions and tigers, the miniature version of human ** is also like tickling in front of them, we will no longer dominate the earth, to improve this situation, only let the miniature version of human beings create a black technology such as the atomic bomb of the corresponding size, which is not impossible, It's just that this kind of black technology will have a long way to go for us at that time.
-
If we shrink humanity by a factor of 100, will we still be able to be the overlord of the earth?
-
OK. Because human beings can dominate the earth not by the size of the volume, but by wisdom, so if human beings are reduced by 100 times, human beings can also dominate the earth.
-
No, because humans are likely to be trampled to death by other animals, and they are not as strong as ants.
-
Yes, even if we shrink human beings, human beings still have minds. For human beings, it's not that we're getting smaller, it's that the things around us are getting bigger. If we want to be mindless like smaller animals, then we can't dominate the planet.
-
The reason why human beings keep the overlord of the earth is because humans are very smart, not because of the size of human beings, if it is really reduced by ten times, as long as the IQ is still there, it can keep the overlord of the earth.
-
Yes. The reason why human beings can become the overlord of the earth is not because of their size or strength, but because of their intelligence, even if they are 10 times smaller, they can still maintain their supremacy.
-
It's hard to say. If humans were ten times smaller, they would be bullied by a lot of animals. Think about it, a person who is more than 100 pounds becomes more than 10 pounds in an instant, it is really weak.
-
Yes, because human supremacy is not earned by size, but by unparalleled intelligence.
As the overlord of the earth, human beings are the ultimate in evolution in every way. Although human beings are not physically strong enough compared to individual species, compared to most creatures on earth, human beings are tall and mighty, especially human brains, which are perfect products of evolution! If humanity were 10 times smaller, would it be possible to create the glorious civilization we have now? >>>More
If we really can shrink tenfold, our lives will become richer because of it, no matter what steel, oil, food, no problem. Now there are more than 7 billion people, and even if it grows to 20 billion people, it will be more than enough for the current storage, but cats should be our enemies because we are too weak.
As the overlord of the earth, human beings are the ultimate in evolution in every way. Although human beings are not physically strong enough compared to individual species, compared to most creatures on earth, human beings are tall and mighty, especially human brains, which are perfect products of evolution! If humanity were 10 times smaller, would it be possible to create the glorious civilization we have now? >>>More
There was a man who wanted to sell his horse, and he stayed in the market for three days in a row, and no one paid any attention. So the man went to see the expert of Soma, and said, "I have a good horse to sell, and I have stayed in the market for three days in a row, and no one has come to ask, and I hope you will help me, and go and see my horse, and go around my horse a few times, and then look back at it when I leave, and I will give you the cost of the day." >>>More
Unreasonable, citizens have no law enforcement power and legislative power, you want ten times the compensation feels too little, it is better to ask for ten thousand times the compensation, 100,000 times the compensation, catch a thief to support the family, catch two thieves to make a fortune, how good is this.