Use concise language to describe Zou Ji s satire on the king of Qi

This article rewrites the story of Qi Xiang Zou Ji using the trivial things in his own life as a metaphor to persuade King Qi Wei to listen to the opinions of the people as the basis for governance.

Zou Ji satirized the king of Qi and gave advice from the Warring States Policy Qi Ceyi.

The prose's clever allegorical device is a feature. Figurative reasoning can use concrete facts to illustrate abstract truths, change esoteric to simple, complex to concise, and change to pleasing to the ear, euphemistic and convincing. Whether or not the monarch can accept advice, whether he can speak widely to avoid oblivion, and whether he can cultivate politics is a major matter related to the rise and fall of the country.

However, as soon as he opened his mouth, he mentioned that he should be admonished, which may make him resist and not easy to accept. The question of whether the individual is beautiful or not, the wife, concubine, guest, and one's own views on this issue are small things in life, very specific, and can arouse the interest of the king. There are similarities between this small matter of life and the major affairs of the state in the point of "being blinded", which can be used as an analogy, and the clever connection between the two things can be very good in terms of the big with the small metaphor.

This article is quite distinctive in the use of language. For example, in the first paragraph, there are three questions and three answers, and different identities have different tones. There are not many words, but they reflect the difference in the relationship between the characters in the dialogue.

Specifically, wives, concubines, and guests all affirmed that Zou Ji was more beautiful than Duke Xu, but his wife had more words "Jun Meishi", and his cousin showed his wife's preference; The concubine also adopted a rhetorical tone, showing the timidity of low status. The guests not only lacked the words "Jun Meishi", but also changed the strong rhetorical tone of his wife and concubine, but positively affirmed that Zou Jimei was better than Xu Gong, and Duan showed a kind of entertainment and welcome attitude. The above three questions and answers have the same meaning, but the sentence structure and tone are different, showing the psychological state of people with different identities.

In short, the method of analogy adopted in this article is very convincing. The article has a cause, a process, an effect, and a comment from the starer, which not only corresponds to the front and back, but also the tone of the characters is vivid and realistic, and it is very dramatic. The arguments are also layered and orderly, with a convincing and rigorous internal logical force.

1. Theme: The text uses Zou Ji to borrow the things and personal feelings of his family and friends to satirize the story of persuading the king of Qi to admonish and eliminate the cover, so as to explain that the monarch must criticize and suggest from a wide range of aspects, and only then can he rejuvenate the country and starve the country.

2. Explanation: Zou Ji satirizes the King of Qi and admonishes the rotten rolling advice" from "Warring States Policy: Qi Ce I", which tells the story of Zou Ji, a strategist of Qi during the Warring States Period, who persuaded the monarch to accept advice, so that he could open up his way and improve politics. The article created the image of Zou Ji as a wise man who is self-aware, good at thinking, and brave to advise.

It also shows the image of King Qi Wei who knows his mistakes and can change them, and his image of a wise monarch who follows the advice like a stream, and the urgent desire and great determination to eliminate defects and improve politics. Tell the reader that the superior can only succeed if he speaks widely, speaks in groups, accepts criticism with an open mind, and actively corrects it.