Ordinary families feel that they can t give their children too good living conditions, so is it nece

Then it must be necessary to have children. Children are of great significance to a family, and I don't think it's extremely dangerous to say that you lose the qualifications to have children because the family is ordinary.

I was born in an ordinary family (thanks to my parents for giving birth to me and allowing me to come to this wonderful world, hehe), although my parents did not give us much help materially, but she gave me almost all their love, they dedicated their youth to me, and spent their hard-earned money.

From the moment I was born, my parents began to "invest" in me. They taught me how to be a human being, provided me with food, clothing, shelter and transportation, and saved money for me to study and study. I'm 26 years old this year and my parents are 50 years old.

Although I am very ordinary now, and my family is also very ordinary, my family is happier and more harmonious because of me。At least that's what my parents told me, and I think it's exactly what they say.

Some people may feel that ordinary families can't give their children excellent educational resources and survival resources, and having children is to let their children serve as the "denominator" for the children of other people's families (rich people), and they can only be at the bottom forever. In fact, this is not the case, because the fate of children is more in their own hands, and children are the hope of a family in the future, a kind of spiritual sustenance of parents.

It is undeniable that a good growth environment will make children better "develop", but this is not absolute, and the vast majority of families are ordinary families, the rich are still in the minority. As an ordinary family, as long as we can give our children enough care and teaching, and do our duty as parents, there is still a high probability that children will grow up well.

There are many ordinary families around me, and some of the children of these ordinary families are relatively promising. When they grow up, they have a good character, a good job, and they know how to be filial to their parents, which is also very praiseworthy.

And children are of great significance to a family, and with children, the relationship between husband and wife will be stronger; (Although some people say that the relationship between husband and wife should not be maintained by children, it is undeniable that with children, the relationship between the two can be more reliable) With children, a family can have hope and more joy; With children, a family can be complete, which can be called a "small family".

Of course, the premise of what I say is that the family is just not wealthy, just ordinary. If the family environment is very poor, and both husband and wife are idle, then I support them not to have children, because having children is a pain for both children and adults.

Children are the hope of the future, and it is definitely necessary. Let's work hard to get our children to the starting line.

There is an old saying that one generation is stronger than the next, and children from ordinary families will also bring love to children and nourish the hearts of parents and parents, it is necessary to have children.

Children are the hope of a family, you can't not have children because of your feelings, with children your family will have the motivation to give children better, will work harder.

Don't be too glassy, don't want others to feel that they have done something wrong without replying to a message, and hire Ye Gu Zhi hat and makeup and other.

I think this is a very normal phenomenon, because everyone thinks differently, they think that having children is a very sacred thing, and some people feel that having children is very happy, and there are also people who have so many children because of their preference for sons. So we must look at it sensibly.

Because some people are not very conscious, and they think that they will retire after having more children, they will have a lot of children.

This is because they feel that after having a child, the family will become more angry, so they will be more energetic, and they also want to enjoy a high-quality evening life.

Because some families have the idea of passing on the family lineage, they want to have many children to carry on the family lineage for them.

Because in this way, the child can have many biological sisters, and when he is old, several children can help each other.

In fact, this depends on the actual situation, first of all, how is the relationship between your husband and wife? Good no good? What is the family atmosphere like for both sides?

Are you optimists or pessimists? Considering these problems because considering that the family environment has a great impact on children, if you are good enough, then I think it is possible to have children, because no matter how bad the economy is, money can be earned, children can always be raised, nine years of compulsory education, the general cultivation of the family can still be given, the important thing is that a good atmosphere of the family environment will not affect the happy growth of children! So I thought it was okay to have children.

And if you have problems with your original family, or the relationship between the husband and wife is average, and the personality is pessimistic, then I still advise you to think about it again, after all, the first is that you can't give a good living and educational conditions, which will affect the future of your children. Second, if you can't give a warm family, it will affect the mental health of children. So if that's the case, I wouldn't recommend having a child in a short period of time!

Sometimes life is still very hard, and this kind of hard work may run through a child's entire life.

To be honest, there is a lot of pressure in life now, especially if you want to live a quality life, people with a bad family environment need to put in a lot of effort, and not all efforts will be rewarded. And those with good family conditions, no matter how good the children are, they can always live a normal life with the help of their parents and families. What's more, the better the family, the more attention has been paid to the cultivation of children!

I don't think so. In fact, whether to have children or not depends not on economic conditions, but on whether the husband and wife have reached a consensus to give their children a stable future and growth environment.

Men and women who struggle with whether or not to have children because of difficult living conditions are actually very responsible parents and should be recognized and praised. How so? The former is a hundred times stronger than those who do what they want and don't think about the future.

Children are not cats and dogs, and they can't come and go as soon as they want. Many children are abandoned and given away, and many children experience the pain of family breakdown when they are minors, all of which are caused by the irresponsibility of their parents. As a qualified adult, after giving birth to a child, you must support and educate you, and you can't willfully let your child suffer harm from an early age, nor can you leave it alone to add a burden to society.

A child's experience of happiness is not about being rich or poor, but about whether they can be cared for by their parents. Young people who have just started a family may have very average economic conditions, and they feel that they cannot provide their children with a comfortable living environment and are hesitant to have children. In fact, if the relationship between the husband and wife is stable, the life goal is clear, having children is a natural thing, financial difficulties are only temporary, as long as you work hard, everything will change.

However, the risk of blindly waiting until the economy improves to have children is that the economic conditions are better but the physical conditions are declining, and missing the best childbearing age is just as cruel to the children!

In fact, having a child is closely related to a person's age, and economic conditions are not too important. But although that being said, quietly facing the reality of life, there are too many children without money, and you will definitely not be able to live a normal life, so you should still choose according to your own conditions!

Getting married and having children is a stage of life that almost everyone has to go through, and after getting married, in addition to wanting to be a dink, husband and wife generally want the crystallization of love that belongs to two people. But having a baby is not so natural and simple.

Whether the family conditions are good or not, you can judge the general situation by having a child, and you can't hide it easily.

Nowadays, people pay attention to "not revealing their wealth", which means that their economic strength is not easily expressed. But a family's economic situation can be well expressed in the matter of having children.

First of all, at the time of delivery, you can see it very intuitively, like those mothers with good family backgrounds, they will generally choose private hospitals with better services and environment, or high-end wards in public hospitals, such wards are naturally more expensive in cost.

In addition, during childbirth, some family members will blindly force the mother to give birth naturally because of the high cost of caesarean section, and even refuse to use ** delivery because of the cost, these details can show the economic situation of a family.

Secondly, when you are in postpartum confinement, choosing whether to stay at home or in a confinement center can also indicate that the situation at home is very different. Those celebrities or mothers with good family conditions are generally admitted to the confinement center directly after giving birth.

The cost of confinement centers also ranges from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, and most mothers in ordinary families will choose tens of thousands of confinement centers at most, and more are obediently confined at home.

Therefore, from the matter of giving birth, it is very intuitive to judge the family situation of a family, and good economic conditions will naturally have good treatment, and ordinary families can only retreat to second.

Having a child can not only see the economic conditions, but also the "family status".

Of course, in addition to the economic conditions of a family, the status of the mother in the family is even more clear when giving birth to a child. The treatment of mothers after childbirth can intuitively reflect the level of the family's position, such as some mothers will be booed by their families, and some will not be welcomed.

Such differential treatment is nothing more than the difference in family status. Women with high family status will naturally receive the consideration and care of their families, while women who are called to come and go at ordinary times will not have much care after giving birth.

Therefore, don't underestimate the matter of giving birth, to a certain extent, it can well reflect the economic conditions of the family and the family status of the mother, if a mother has no family status, the economic conditions of the family are not good, then the days after that are really difficult.

If you can't provide good material conditions for your children, do you want to have children?

In life, Tuanzi's mother has seen too many families who can give birth, but dare not give birth. Such families are stronger than the lowest level, but they are not up to the middle class, let alone rich families, they are the group of people who are really afraid of having children.

Such a family is caught in the middle, and they are not willing to let their children survive in the cracks like themselves, but even if they work hard, they can't raise their lives to a higher level, so in various entanglements, they delay having children again and again.

So if the economic conditions are not good, should I have children? In fact.