In ancient times, ordinary people were so poor that they starved to death, why did they have so many

Because if they don't have people, they won't have labor, and if they don't, they're more likely to starve to death.

Because ancient people attached great importance to their heirs, and only with heirs could they inherit the incense, so they would give birth to so many babies, and in ancient times, there was no family planning like now.

Because having one is also poor, and giving birth to a bunch is also poor, so if you give birth to one, life will not necessarily change a lot, and if you have more, they may have a future in the future.

1.There are few recreational activities, resulting in too much leisure time outside of farm work to pass the time, 2The more you raise, as long as one of them has a chance, the whole family has a way out, 3In ancient times, the mortality rate was high, and in order to have children alive to provide for them.

In order to increase the labor force and have more children, some children can be allowed to work.

It is because many people think that having so many babies can make the family fire more prosperous and richer.

Because they can't control their behavior, and if they want to control their population with drugs, they can't afford to buy them.

Yes, many women work two jobs, while working, while taking care of the family, husbands and children, and serving the elderly, which is very hard. In particular, some poor families who do not have money Women will choose to have more children:

1. The more children there are, the more labor, and the work will not be tiring in the future.

In many families in rural areas, doing farm work and housework all need labor, one more person has one more helper, and there is more strength to work, only when there is more labor force at home, can they be busy, so they are willing to have more children. But what they didn't expect was that so many children would undoubtedly increase the burden on the family, and they couldn't even go to school, so how could they change the family's predicament.

2. In order to have a boy, he can only continue to live.

Some families have obviously given birth to two daughters, in order to give birth to a son, they have to continue to give birth, for them to marry the daughter spilled out of the water, only raising children can prevent old age, so in some rural families, we can see that sons are usually the most favored.

3. Think that many children are blessed.

Many families are influenced by traditional beliefs, and because of the economic situation of their generation, parents pin their hopes on their children, hoping that their children will be able to change the fate of the family in the future.

4. The more children laugh and laugh.

There is only one child in the family, and when the child is young, there are no siblings, and the relationship with the parents will be very close. Even if parents only raise one child, they can reap full happiness. However, as the child grows up, his relationship with his parents is not so close, and there is a generation gap with his parents, the laughter and laughter in the family will inevitably decrease as the child grows up.

However, families with many children are different, whether the children are young or when the children grow up, between the children, between parents and children, there will be more opportunities for the family to be full of laughter and laughter because of the large number of people and popularity.

Nowadays, many people feel that raising children is a great burden because they think too much, starting from pregnancy, even before pregnancy, do a series of examinations, and have regular checkups after childbirth, fight against vaccines, buy milk powder, complementary food, nutritional products, disposable diapers, clothes, children's shampoo, soap, toothpaste, toothbrush, toys and so on. When I grow up, I have to invest in make-up classes, and interest classes even spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to get a good school or buy a school district house. And these, for raising only one person, can be used as labor.

When you are old and can't work, you also have children to provide you with food and drink, perfect.

The first is that they want to get more labor. A family may have parents in the prime of life and elderly grandparents, and it may be these parents who are really in the workforce. So they will want to create more labor for the family, have one child, can have one more labor force, then give birth to four can get four labor force.

In the eyes of many parents who have not gone to school, children mean labor, because these children are sensible early, and it is precisely because of this that "children from poor families are in charge early".

They can usually take care of the elderly at home, cook and fry their own food, and when they grow up, they can go to the field to help their parents plow the fields, or go to work in factories. This can be a lot easier for parents, but they forget how much they need to raise a child. Having one child will put the family in trouble again, and they will want to have another one, to train another labor force for the family, and so on, and it is these children who are pitied.

Second, I want to cultivate a "golden phoenix".

The second is that they want to cultivate a "golden phoenix", we have all heard of the phoenix man, that is, his own family is poor, but with his excellent grades, he was admitted to the countryside, entered the university, found a stable job, and finally gave back to his family. Many parents in rural areas have this idea to have children, hoping that their children can soar to the sky. But they forgot how difficult it is to cultivate a "golden phoenix".

What you need to pay for this is the strength of your whole family, so that your children can go to school from elementary school to college, and you really have to let your children go to school.

But many people will give up halfway through because they can't bear it. So we see equally excellent siblings, because of family reasons, can only let one child go to school, and some are destined to give up their studies in the middle. The person may have gone to work in the fields or in the factory, but the one who continues to go to school has a brighter future.

We have heard and seen too many such stories, and they are too cruel.

3. Old thinking.

The third is their old thinking, many elderly people still have the thinking of "patriarchy" and "more children and more blessings" in their heads, which also makes their children tortured. Because they will be forced by these old people to have children until they give birth to sons. And those who are educated and rich, they are more open-minded and give birth to boys and girls alike.

And these poor people who are not educated, under the influence of such thinking, have more and more children.

Summary: Poor families should not have so many children when they have children. You should consider your family situation before having children, otherwise this is the torture of children.

Born into such a poor family, it is the most difficult for children, because they need to rely on their own struggle to make progress.

This has a lot to do with the difference between the economic situation and the development of education and the concept of life in ancient times. First of all, the economic situation, ancient China was an agricultural civilization and agricultural self-sufficiency farming economy, which required labor to work to have food, and because he was self-sufficient, not a market economy like now, then if the family wants to have more food income, it must need more labor. Having children was a symbol of labor for the peasants at that time, so even if they were poor, they still had children.

The second is the difference in the way of education. In ancient times, those who could receive education were generally high-ranking officials and nobles, and only the children of official eunuchs could have the ability to receive education. However, as the children of ordinary peasant families, they only need to raise them from childhood to adulthood, that is, relatively speaking, they can support them, without investing too much money in education and other aspects.

Therefore, for the ancient peasants, having children only had a certain amount of survival pressure for them, but there would not be too much pressure on education and funds, so they would be more willing to have a lot of children.

A change in the concept of life. Nowadays, people pay more attention to the quality of life, so they pay more attention to eugenics and fewer children. And the farmers in ancient times, what they hoped for was to have more children in order to change the situation of the family, and.

According to the influence of this concept in ancient times, farmers wanted to see their children and grandchildren full of prosperity and prosperity. For them, it symbolizes new life and labor abundance.

Therefore, for the ancient peasants, although they were very poor, but giving birth to a bunch of children was the only way for them to make the family rich, in fact, for the ancient peasants, if the family was prosperous, they would have more opportunities to turn over and change their fate, which is different from the current society.

It is because they feel that having more children is more blessed, and after having children, they have labor, and children are also important assets, and after giving birth to children, the return is far greater than the cost.

In this way, you can increase the labor force, and you can have many children to take care of yourself in your old age, which will be more secure.

Because in ancient times, it was the age of farming, and most people made a living from farming, so if they had more children, there was a lot of labor.

From ancient times to the present, it has been common for farmers to give birth to a large number of children. In rural areas, old-age care is basically continued in this way, even in the current rural areas, these generations of old people are the same. In the old village, there are more than a dozen brothers and sisters in the family, and it is common for two or three sisters to be in the family.

If you have more children, you can help each other on the issue of providing for the elderly, and you can also share the financial pressure.

1.Since ancient times, the more children there are, the happier they are, and the more people they have, the more prosperous the family. A lot of people are good at doing things, a lot of people have big houses, and a lot of people aren't afraid of being bullied.

Therefore, it is not uncommon for an average peasant family to have several children, and a family with six or seven children. In the past, people lived in poverty, but there was not much pressure on life. At that time, the cost of raising a child was relatively low, and sometimes a person with a stutter could feed a litter of children.

There are a lot of wars between countries, and there are skirmishes between villages, ethnic groups, and families. The strong are the capital. The number of people also determines the social status of the family.

2.In the past, agricultural production was done one by one, and there were many ways of life for agricultural production, and it was labor-intensive and required a lot of labor. It is difficult to grow crops without more labor.

Without a good agricultural harvest, it is difficult to make ends meet and have to have more children. In ancient times, the social economy was dominated by agriculture, labor was the primary productive force, and population played a decisive role in the family economy. There is no eternal law in the pace of social progress, only eternal interests.

Human behavior is controlled by the human mind. However, the human mind is driven by profit.

3.In the past, family planning technology was backward, and it was difficult to control births. Fewer or fewer births is difficult to grasp and difficult to achieve.

In ancient times, people did not have any contraception. When a woman gets married, she naturally gets pregnant, and when she gets pregnant, she gives birth to children, so that each family naturally does not have too many children. In ancient times, medical care was poor and child mortality was high.

Having more children can make up for this problem, which means that the survival rate of children can be improved.

4.The problem of poor peasants and many children in ancient times led to a factor in productivity and warfare in ancient times. Combined with the social environment at that time, such as frequent wars, both sides were relatively large. The implementation of the recuperation policy, at that time, ** also encouraged their own people to have more children.

In short, the fact that the peasants in the past were poor and had many children was not only a human factor, but also the result of uncontrollable population fertility.

In addition to the above-mentioned requirements for labor, more children were affected by the old-fashioned concept of fertility. Ancient China was an agrarian economy based on agricultural civilization and agricultural self-sufficiency, which required labor to work to have food, and because he was self-sufficient, he would not become poorer and poorer.

Because for the ancient peasants, giving birth to children was used to let them work, as long as they were given a mouthful of food to eat.

Because for ancient people, their thinking was very feudal, and they thought that the more children they had, the better they would be.

For families with average conditions, I think they should have fewer or even no children, because as their children, they are likely to lose at the starting line.

I have seen many parents with poor conditions, who give birth to children and have to go out to work to earn money, and the children are lost to the elderly and become left-behind children. The key old people are also uneducated, have no money, and can't give their grandchildren a good education, so it's good to just be well fed and clothed. Nowadays, cultural classes in primary and secondary schools are becoming more and more difficult, and these left-behind children lack the care of their parents, no one to help them with homework, and many of them are not doing well in their studies, and they drop out of school early and embark on the same path of working to earn money as their parents, and the proportion of people who can get ahead is too small.

However, my colleagues felt that the poor should let Tangerine have more children, in case there is a genetic mutation and there is a future, you can take the whole family to get rich and run to Xiaokang!

I want to say how tired a child from an average family is living! Finally, the front group, everything depends on itself, and after working hard, I have to be gnawed by the whole family! There have been too many examples of this in the countryside in the past.

A baby is out of breath and has entered the city. Parents stopped working early, waiting for their son to support the elderly at the age of forty or fifty, and the younger brothers and sisters at home also have to pull, how heavy the burden of this promising child is! No wonder most people don't want to find a rural person when they get married, there are too many family matters!

Of course, this is only an individual phenomenon, and it is enough to have a few children according to the situation. But generally speaking, if adults have average economic conditions, try not to have more children, because children may also suffer from it.