Does Flycore refer to Philips chips? Is Flying Core good?

With the spin-off of Philips' chip division, the development of its business has also been severely constrained. Even their own products rarely use flying cores. A series of problems such as high cost and difficult development make it gradually lose its position in the market.

At present, most of the mid-to-high-end *** use the telechip + wolfson solution or the Samsung + wolfson solution;

Most of the low-end ones use Sigmetal single-chip solutions, which are nothing more than to control costs.

Up to now. There is no complete teardown report for this machine. But there should be on the official website.

The 28-core with better sound quality in Philips is sigmatel...Therefore, I prefer the Tanyan Circle used in 054 as sigmatel...Secondly.

Feixin has long since separated from Philips and flown alone. Forehead. That is, the reason why many of Philips' later machines are not flying cores.

SA29 uses SIGMATEL3770 main Xun good control chip, and the specific chip of SA054 is not clear.

But sigmatel is more likely.

Now Philips has almost completely used the Sigmatel series of chips, and its own things are rarely used.

The flying core has completely declined, don't care about whether it is a flying core, most of the machines with good sound quality are not flying cores at present.

Philips really doesn't need to fly silver to open the core, such as SA28. You can use the easychip software to check it.

Lord, Lord.

Of course, Philips' machine is Feixin, doesn't he use his own to spend money on other manufacturers?

Flying cores, of course.

Mainstream chips. Flying Core "Osen" Sigmart.

Yes, the vast majority of Sony Ai's current models use Philips chips.

Personally, I think that the Philips chip has a relatively fast response speed and is just right when installed on a non-smart mobile phone platform.

Of course, since 05, all of Soai's machines have begun to use Philips' heart tablets (except for those smart phones).

The sound quality is not only related to the chip, but also directly linked to the circuit design and the quality of the capacitor! The ** style of different machines is different,iriver's machine sound rendering is heavier,iPod's machine restoration is better,Each machine can also do different things if it uses the same chip sound quality difference,The sound quality is very subjective,It all depends on personal preference,If you like to listen to rock and pop,Of course, it is to choose the iriver7,8 series of flying cores,If you want to listen to the sound field, choose 9 series,Classical with 1,3,5 series to listen to female voices with T10 (Samsung heart) is also good! The sound quality is very subjective!

Hehe! I feel that in addition to Meizu's mini, I won't consider other machines for the time being, mini's bass is fierce, but it's a bit too much, and it still feels a little fake! Hehe!

The iRiver IFP795 is the Philips chip Many people say that the sound quality of the 7-9 series is better than the current one.

The Philips chip is good, it's just that OPPO won't use it and it doesn't work for it

In the past, Avery and not both used Philips chips.

I made my fortune on Philips

The sound quality of Avery and the current machine is not necessarily as good as the previous 7-9 series with Philips chips.

Apple iPod is originally a trendy product, everyone has their own hobbies, just like a woman buying clothes, expensive is not necessarily good.

I just like it, and no one blows the iPod in the first place, and the sound quality is good.

The domestic product Meizu is strong.

Sound quality is related to many aspects, such as chips, circuit design, interface design, file format, bit rate.

Is it CD recordable?

Domestic tatters just didn't give full play to the real strength of Feixin

The high quality of "Feixin" is unquestionable, which is affirmed in the industry.

The quality of the sound is the result of the synergy of all aspects, the chip is of course very important, but it is not the decisive factor, and the people who buy the iPod generally do not pay attention to the sound quality, the iPod plays with design, and it plays with fashion. The focus of each brand is different.

About OPPO, I only know the hard "flying core", and I think everything will be fine. If the internal key circuits are not done well, the effect will definitely not come out.

Recommend a high-quality domestic product, Meizu E3. The one used is the flying core. It's been on the market for a long time, but it's still available in many places.

Whether the sound quality is good or not depends entirely on the chip used. Sometimes, the headphones you use are also a big factor, and a good pair of headphones can make you feel like a tiger. Of course, if you exclude some secondary factors, the chip and manufacturing process are important factors that affect the sound quality, and the same chip manufacturing process is different.

But in the general civilian level, Philips' chips do have excellent sound quality.

The IFP-180, which made Iriver famous overnight, uses Philips chips!! The peripheral circuitry of the OPPO is not well done, so the sound quality is not good. I'm now using iRiver's IFP-780, a generation classic.

I'm using iriver's T10 now, using the chip of Avery and cooperation with Samsung, but the sound quality is very good, I agree with you, the people of the core theory are affected by **, I personally feel that this is not only a problem with the chip, but also a lot of factors, such as circuits and headphones, which are the main factors that determine the sound quality.

Haha, there are good chips and good peripheral circuits, otherwise it's a good cripple *** should be balanced and coordinated with all accessories, and the flash memory type must be leaked A-level chips, and headphones, to match the impedance of the headphones, different categories of headphone iPods play with industrial design, and the sound quality is really ordinary.

Now the sound quality is ahead of the curve is iRiver iAudio

Who said the 7 8 series was better than the current one.

I have T10 and IFP 795

The treble and bass are basically equal.

The alto 795 is thicker than the T10.

The T10 is more delicate and has a better sense of hierarchy than the 795

Just listen to Liang Jingru and Faye Wong.

The T10 bass is shallower and deeper than the 795.

The 795's P-core is clocked at 66MHz

The T10's ARM9 is clocked at 200MHz

It's 486 compared to P4.

Meizu is also using Philips chips, you can find a *** like this to listen to! Not bad!

Aioudi 8 with flying heart Even if you don't turn on BBE, the sound quality is much better than the general *** *** The quality is not only related to the chip, but more importantly, the circuit design! ~

I have iaudio, I don't use Filipino core, but the sound quality is very good, the key lies in the ability of the manufacturer.

It's OPPO garbage, and the headphones it comes with are even more garbage.

The MimiPlayer Philips chip I use is not bad.

Meizu is not bad. I have an e3c with a Philips in-ear earbuds and it feels ok.

Good 3 stars.

In fact, it has something to do with headphones.

Personally, I think that these high-tech aspects are still better in Japan and South Korea, and I personally think Sony is good.

It depends on what model, some are good, some are not good.

It depends on your preference ... It's good to feel it.

I will, but I won't give it to you, I'll be mad at you!! Hey!!!

Philips has no chips, about two or three years ago, his chip department became independent, and then the chips launched are not competitive, such as the pure ***** chips of other companies today support lossless and other functions, his ** chips can't keep up with these trends, so they fall behind, consumers still like chips with more functions.

At present, the DAC of the flying core is also rare, and the sound of using the flying DAC should be good, such as the W800 of Soison, the world's first Walkman mobile phone is the Flying Core DAC, but at present, the crystal and Wolfson's DAC are used more, and the flying core is estimated to be no longer good... The tide is over.

I also really like the sound of the flying core, and I was very impressed by the iRiver spaceship

Because it's old, the Sigmatt chip ** is lower, 500 has no flying core, Philips's own and Philips itself uses Sigmat for most of it.

Do you listen to ** or listen to chips? The cost of flycore is too high, or it can be said that the manufacturer thinks that flycore is not cost-effective. Now Feixin is just flickering Xiaobai, don't you don't like to listen, it's a fact.

In this way, T51 is known as 5 cores, the cost is much more expensive than the flying core, and it is still scolded to death, which is a negative example of idealism.

It is said that Feixin is very expensive,,, Philips' own low-end products don't use it...

China likes to compress the cost of products, so some chips with lower cost and quality, such as Zhuhai Juli, have seized most of the market.

The SN number is: m3sp02ghbzopz1929, isn't this very clear, m3sp, s (samsung) stands for Samsung screen, P (Philips) stands for Philips chip.

Meizu's machines all have serial numbers, and from this you can see the version of the machine, capacity, production date and other information.

Model Version Number Capacity Size Year Month Date The number of the machine (not useful to us) e.g. m3sp02ghbzopz1929

After disassembly, it is M3 SP 02G HBZ OPZ1929H, which ranks 8th out of 26 English letters

b is the second of the 26 letters

z is the 26th of 26 letters

Model:M3 Version:SP Capacity: 2g Date of manufacture February 26, 2008 The manufacturer's record number is OPZ1929

After March 2008, the production is Ouxin, which used to be Feixin, congratulations on buying Feixin.

No, the M3 is used by Philips amplifiers.

A product without a flying core may use 2 different chips to change the code ?? Do the pins function the same???

Don't redesign that, that's going to cost more.

E3 is used by Philips M3 is an amplifier not a decoding chip, the owner can look at the official meizu to know.

After 08, all of them are Wolfson chips.

Please use chipgenius software to view, but it seems that you can only view the main control chip, not the decoder core.