Leave me with me, can t you guarantee that I won t do something to you?

What does this mean is that if you keep someone around, is there any guarantee that they won't do anything to you? That means he might not like you a little too much.

Keeping you by your side, it's hard to guarantee that you won't do something to him, even if you do something, you have to communicate well with the two of you, don't just do what you want, do whatever you want, and do something that others can accept, so that you can get along.

Well, it's better to see how it goes.

After getting along for a long time, something can happen. But it's not for long, so let's be a gentleman first.

I feel like what I can do is to keep him there with you and give him a sense of security.

Keeping me around, it's hard to guarantee that I won't do something, what does it mean when you're with him? It's possible to do something shameful.

Generally speaking, yes, generally everyone has such self-control and restraint, and should be able to deal with them.

As the saying goes, love arises over time, and if you stay together, of course you will have feelings, and it is inevitable that you will not do anything out of the ordinary.

If he says that to you, I don't think you should stay with him, because it must be a very bad thing for you to stay with him, and it must be a very dangerous thing for you.

I think the meaning of this sentence is to keep you with him, and there is a possibility that other feelings will arise between you.

I think it's a man saying to a woman. Maybe it's something more ambiguous!

Leave me around, man, I'm not going to do anything to you, who said that? Doesn't that what her boyfriend said keep her around? Do you want to drive it away? This boyfriend is quite weird.

What he meant was that maybe it wasn't the best thing to do to stay around.

It shows that he loves you very much, but also wants to have you.

If your boyfriend keeps you around, it's hard to guarantee that he won't do something to you, then it must be um, if your boyfriend wants to keep you around, he will definitely do something to you.

She's just using you to relieve her loneliness, you're just a doll when she's lonely, stay away from her, otherwise who knows what she'll do.

Why should you be bound by a married woman???

Maybe he is insecure, and his reluctance to meet your friends means that he is willing to accept your friends' careful and rigorous judgment of him, and your friends will also use their eyes for you, nitpicking, and scrutinizing you all before reassuring you to have a good relationship.

A confident man always believes that he is your best choice and will gladly accept the scrutiny of your friends, and if your friend is what I said above, then you should think carefully about whether to continue dating him. 5 A woman will only pay special attention to you when she is interested in you, and she will be very sad about everything about you, especially sometimes she may seem to be nosy, but it is really because she is very serious about you, so she is willing to take the initiative to help you no matter what she does. She may not dare to discuss you directly with your good friends and brothers, but when others talk about you, she must be very concerned, and even take the initiative to talk to her best friend, but although it is confidential, she is still very excited from her conversation with her best friend.

But it's only because of you that she has such attention, and if it were someone else, she would definitely not have it.

4.Let others misunderstand you.

Sometimes you can see that you don't want to have anything to do with her, but if she takes the initiative to pull you or get closer to you, others will be able to see what she means. But anyone who has a little eye naturally chooses to create a chance for the two of you to live alone, and if you don't want to bother the two of you anymore, it will make others misunderstand whether the two of you are really together, in fact, the two of you may not have any contact, but she creates an illusion for others, that is, the two of you are now a couple. This shows that he already has a special idea about you, and he just wants to be with you, that is, to let others see that you are already his person, and also to let others stop thinking about you.

Regarding love, I have heard these words: "You, the person who worries me, always carry a little bit of love and warmth, resist all insecurities and fears for me, and give me the courage to love this imperfect world." "If a relationship doesn't do you any good, or even causes you a lot of distress and pain, annoyance and sorrow, makes you not feel like yourself, makes you grovel, and makes you cry, then walk away.

Yes, a good relationship will definitely bring you growth and make you better and better, and a bad love will make you unrecognizable. A woman must be with someone who spoils you, loves you, and cherishes you. In fact, some couples are together, but they don't love each other, and if one of them doesn't love enough, it will be difficult for the relationship to continue.

It is said that a woman's heart is a needle, and a man's mind is sometimes difficult to guess. How much a man loves you,

Get out of him! He can't give you anything! Do you want to be an unknown junior, such a price is too big for you! Hurry up and find someone who can marry you, this is the right thing to do! Things that don't work out are still miserable for yourself in the end!!

Letting go is the best choice, when a person can't give you anything, still nostalgic? You should learn to stop your losses in time.

Since you have said such things from your heart, you can conclude that There is a problem between the two of us in this regard, and it is more serious, and you are disappointed, so you say that even the person who pursues you is better than him, which is really incomprehensible, if things really come to this point, then there is no room for recovery, it is better to separate, you can say this to him at this time. You can say you got it, but you didn't cherish it.

But people who don't get it are very kind to me. With how much nicer you have done me, this really disappoints me.

How good it is to have such a person in my life, when I am bitter and tired, I gently walked to my side, handed over a towel and said:"Take a break! It's still a long time, so let's do it tomorrow!

When I'm annoyed, helpless, or tired, take a cup of tea, quietly accompany me, listen to my nagging, listen to me tell my grievances; When I was depressed, when I couldn't hold on, when I couldn't see hope, I touched my shoulder and said:"Don't worry, with me, there is no river in the world that cannot be crossed"。

When I am lonely, lonely, impatient, sad, and my heart is like ashes, I silently stay by my side, read it in my heart, gently wipe the tears from the corners of my eyes for me, listen to me quietly, comfort me, and tear a piece of the most beautiful sunshine with a smile to heal me.

How good it is to have such a person in your life. Tolerate my strengths, but also tolerate my shortcomings, like my willfulness when I was young, and love my rickety appearance when I grow old; I care about my pure and lovely, heroic youth, and I also care about my nagging when I am old.

Since you are not as good as a suitor to me, what reason do you have for me to be by your side?

This sentence can be simply said, the suitors are better than you, so let's reflect on it.

It seems that people think they are cold to youIt can be said that people are going to break up with you

As long as she is truly good to someone, she is happy, and one day she will understand that she will be just as good to you.

To be grateful! But there are some people in the world who are like this: you are good to him (her), he (she) takes it for granted, and those people are the most conscienceless and shameless.

Since you are so good will meet.

I still want to stay by my side, unless the other party can't let it go, or I still care about it. Or maybe it's not deep enough to hurt the other party.

Even if you don't like it anymore, are you prepared?

"Let Me Stay With You".

Original song: Eason Chan.

Lyrics: Tang Hanxiao.

Composition: Tang Hanxiao.

I never speak, let me stay with you.

Because I'm afraid, there is no one.

I never struggle because I know.

The world is too big, too much time to waste.

There's so much to face, too much to face.

There are too many things to distinguish between truth and falsehood, and there are too many things to distract from right and wrong.

I can't keep you with you, just so that you can stand alone in the future.

As long as I stay with you, the smallest of me has big dreams.

Time goes forward, there must be no end to the intersection.

have disturbed the world, all understanding.

As long as I stay with you, the smallest of me has big dreams.

I am willing to be quiet and live in every corner with you.

Application of comparative advantage.

The principle of comparative advantage explains the benefits of interdependence and **. Because interdependence is so prevalent in the modern world, the principle of comparative advantage has many applications. Here are two examples, one with novelty and the other with extremely important practical importance.

Tiger? Should Woods mow the lawn himself.

Tiger? Tiger Woods spends a lot of time walking around the grass. He is one of the most talented golfers of his generation, and he can hit the ball and get it inside the hole on the path that most non-professional golfers can only dream of.

In all likelihood, he excelled in other activities as well. For example, we can imagine that Woods could mow his own lawn faster than anyone else. But just because he can mow the lawn quickly, does that mean he should?

For this question, we can use the concepts of opportunity cost and comparative advantage. For example, Woods can mow the lawn in 2 hours. In those same two hours, he was able to make a TV commercial for Nike shoes and earn $10,000.

Compared to him, who lives in Forrester next door to him? Gumpu was able to mow the lawn of the Woods house in four hours. In these same 4 hours, he can work at a McDonald's shop and earn 2 0 dollars.

In this example, the opportunity cost of woods mowing the lawn is $10,000, while the opportunity cost of Forrester is $2 0. Woods has an absolute advantage in mowing the lawn because he can do it in less time. But Forrester has a comparative advantage in mowing the lawn because of his low opportunity cost.

In this example, the benefits are enormous. Instead of mowing the lawn, Woods should have gone for a commercial, and he should have hired Forrester to mow the lawn. As long as he paid Forrester more than $20 and less than $10,000, both sides would be in a better position.

Of course, Jill would reason in the same way. If that happens, Jack and Jill will each bring 40 gallons of water to town. The total sales volume will be 80 gallons, while ** will drop to $40.

Thus, if the two heads pursue their own self-interest in deciding individually how much to produce, the total amount they produce is greater than the output of the monopoly, the amount they receive is lower than that of the monopoly, and the total profit earned is less than the monopoly profit.

Although the logic of self-interest makes the increase in the output of the two heads greater than the monopoly level, it does not make the two heads reach a competitive configuration. Consider what happens when each twin head produces 40 gallons. ** is $40 and $1,600 profit per double-headed.

In this case, Jack's egoistic logic again comes to a different conclusion:

Now my profit is $1600. Let's say I ramp up my production to 50 gallons. In this case, a total of 90 gallons of water can be sold,** which is $30 a gallon.

My profit was only $1,500. Increasing production will make ** go down, and I'll be in a better position to keep production at 40 gallons. ”

The results of Jack and Jill producing 40 gallons each seem to be some kind of equilibrium. In fact, this result is known as the Nash equilibrium (in honor of the economic theorist John?). Nash).

A Nash equilibrium is an interacting economic agent in which each chooses his or her own optimal strategy when the strategy chosen by the other side is a given. In this example, when Jill was given 40 gallons, Jack's optimal strategy was to produce 40 gallons. Similarly, when Jack was expected to produce 40 gallons, Jill's optimal strategy was to produce 40 gallons.

Once they reached this Nash equilibrium, neither Jack nor Jill had the incentive to make different decisions.

To illustrate this relationship more fully, let's look at how the marginal output (MPL) of labor relates to the marginal cost (MC). Let's assume that the cost of an additional worker is $500 and the marginal output is 50 cases of apples. In this case, it costs $500 to produce an additional 50 cases of apples, and the marginal cost of a case of apples is $500 for 50, or $10.

More generally, if w is the wage, and moreover, an additional unit of labor produces the output of a unit of MPL, then the marginal cost of a unit of production is MC W MPL.

This analysis shows that the marginal decline in output is closely related to the increase in marginal cost. When our apple orchards are crowded with workers, each additional worker increases apple production (MPL decreases). Similarly, when an apple business produces a large number of apples, the apple orchard is already crowded with workers, so that the cost of producing an extra box of apples increases (MC increases).

Now consider our profit maximization criteria. We have previously established that profit-maximizing firms choose the amount of labor so that the marginal value of output (p mpl) of labor equals wages. We use a mathematical formula to write this:

p×mpl＝w

If we divide the two sides of this equation by the mpl, we get.

p=w/mpl

We just mentioned that W MPL is equal to the marginal cost MC. Therefore, we can derive the above formula on behalf of others.

p=mc