Is there a big performance gap between T3200 and T5800?

There is a gap, but it's not big, the Core series mainly relies on the main frequency to determine the winner, and the performance improvement is not big after the level 2 cache exceeds 2M, let alone the external frequency.

Both are designed to have the same thermal power consumption, both of which are at the 35W level.

The 5800 and 3200 are not Xunchi 2 and belong to the transition. And it can't be said that the 5800 supports Centrino 2, it can only be said that the Centrino 2 platform can also support 5800.

The Centrino 2 platform includes a new device, a new generation of motherboards, and a new wireless network card, so the advantages are:

For the processor, better manufacturing process (45 process), better power control (25W), higher performance (1066 external frequency).

For motherboards, as long as it supports 1066 external clocks, supports DDR3 memory, and has a stronger X4500 integrated graphics card (for X45GM).

For wireless network cards, it is the new 5 series that supports a maximum (theoretically) of 300m.

Model Frequency FSB L2 Cache Manufacturing Process.

T5800 800MHz 2MB 45NMT3200 667MHZ 1M 65NM The latter has high calorific value, and the former has high comprehensive performance.

T3200 Pentium Dual-Core, 677MHz, 1M FSB 667MHz

Interface type socket 754

Number of cores: Dual-core.

Frequency L2 cache 1m

General-purpose register data width 64 bits.

Production process 45 nm.

Stepspeed SupportStepSpeedTDP Supports TDP

CPU model: Intel Core2 Duo (Merom) T5800 (

Core frequency: Number of cores: 2

Core Type: Merom

Interface Type: Socket P

64-bit technology: Yes.

L2 cache: 2MB

FSB: 800MHz

CPU External Frequency: 200MHz

Production process: The main difference is the difference between the front-end bus and the L2 cache, this is also the difference in CPU level, and then there is a core dual-core, one is a Pentium dual-core, the architecture inside is different, two CPUs, of course, T5800 performance is better. Centrino II is just a platform, this is the motherboard chip, CPU, wireless network card three main hardware composition, the higher the level, of course, the better the performance.

If it's for home use.

You can't just play a small game on the Internet.

If you're playing big games or you're doing design.

There is definitely a difference in speed.

The T5800 is about the same as the 6400.

3200 and 4200 are about the same.

The CPU machine looks at it for itself.

It's up to you to finish the big game.

If you play, you will have a discrete graphics card.

No, then. Just integrated. Absolutely.

Cache and second-level cache are not the same, mainly when drawing, can play, your requirements to buy t3200 on the line.

Benshuang and Cool Twin are actually like the relationship between Celeron and Pentium.

The Pentium dual-core T3200 is 65nm.

The Core T5800 is 45 nm.

The Besturn dual-core T3200 adopts the MEROM architecture, and the main frequency is, under the same architecture, the higher the main frequency, the higher the performance, and the impact of the L2 cache and front-side bus is not great. Therefore, the Besturn dual-core T3200 is stronger than the Core 2 dual-core that adopts the MEROM architecture and has the following main frequency, such as: T5250, T5450

And the T5800. It is the CPU of the notebook, with a main frequency of 2G and a L2 cache of 2M

A lot of books use this CPU Haier's seems to be **around 6000.。

There are not many words. Mine is T5800, the difference is that the L2 cache is larger, 2M T3200 is 1M, the process is the same, both are 65nm; 45nm is P7350 or above, and the kind is 3M L2 cache.

Generally speaking, the difference is not very big, but most people like to buy relatively better performance, and the psychology is more comfortable, mainly for the software that comes out in the future, and the software in the future may optimize the application of the L2 L2 cache, because the current CPU The second-level cache is getting bigger and bigger My desktop E8400 is 6M I hope that it will not affect my use of new software within 3 years Everyone generally likes to use the latest software to play the latest games o( o Haha Devil May Cry, Crysis, Red Three At the moment, this u is fine.

Not big, in the 3DMark05 test results, T5800 is more than 3800 points, T3200 is more than 3500 points, and there is not much difference between the usual use of wide hunger. The main frequency and architecture of the T3200 are the same as those of the T5800, and the L2 cache and front-end bus are lower than those of the T5800.

However, the ** of the T5800 is much higher than that of the T3200, and the United States is cautious to return here by 40 to 50 dollars.

Don't talk nonsense if you don't understand the first floor! Also, tell the second floor that the T5800 uses the MEROM architecture, 65nm technology, not 45nm! The only advantage that T5800 and T4200 want to have over is that the cache is larger, but what's the use of that?

The architecture is too old! The old-fashioned Pentium M single-core processor (not the current Pentium dual-core) also has a 3M L2 cache, can it be compared with the current Core 2 of Shengsun?

Let me clarify, the T4200 is definitely better than the T5800! As a new core, the performance of the T4200 is definitely not worse than the T5800, even if it does not have a significant advantage over the T5800! Don't be fooled by the names "Pentium" and "Core", that's just a brand's trademark!

Core 2, Pentium Duo, and Celeron Duo are three Intel series, which are high-end, mid-range, and low-end!

Similar to the previous Pentium 4 and Celeron D!

The Pentium Dual-Core is not a transitional product, and it came out later than the Core 2. The aim is to compete with cheap AMD Turion processors.

The Pentium Dual-Core and Core Dual-Core use the exact same core architecture, except for the L2 cache and front-side bus. The Pentium dual-core T20XX series uses a Core 1YONAH core. The Besturn dual-core T2310 to T3400 use the Merom architecture of the Core 2 dual-core T5 and T7 series.

The Pentium dual-core T4200 uses the Penryn architecture of the latest P8400 of the Core 2!

The architecture of the T4200 is a whole generation new than that of the T5800! Although the L2 cache is 1M less, the T4200 uses the latest 45nm Penryn architecture, which is 10 watts per hour less power than the Merom architecture of the T5800 using 65nm technology, and supports the SSE4 instruction set, which is also more powerful than the T5800 Zhizhi Chain, which only supports the SSE3 instruction set. Support for newer DDR3 memory.

Overall, the T4200 is much better than the T5800! It's like the T2390 processor is stronger than the Core 1st Gen T2400!

Don't be fooled by the names of Core, Pentium, and Celeron, and JS should not use these names to mislead consumers! The Pentium Dual Core is not definitely worse than the Core 2!

Now the Pentium product belongs to the transitional period of products, and the Core T5800 has an absolute advantage compared with the Pentium T4200 (processing speed, heat size, etc.). The more programs a computer opens, the higher the requirements for the configuration of the computer. Whether you can open so many programs depends not only on the quality of the CPU, but also on the configuration of the internal file to set up the memory graphics card.

To play Perfect World, as long as the graphics card memory can keep up, the Pentium processor is definitely enough.

The nucleus contains a different embedding heart.

T4200 is an upgraded version of the Besturn dual-core T3200 (, the main frequency has not changed, it is still the same, the front-side bus has been upgraded to 800MHz, the manufacturing process has been upgraded to 45nm, the core has been upgraded to the Penryn core, and it has been upgraded to a multi-** instruction set.

t5800:

Core Frequency: Core Type: Merom

L2 cache: 2MB

FSB: 800MHz

CPU External Frequency: 200MHz

The production worker is instructed to talk about Jane Ant:

Not obvious, as can be seen from the specifications of both.

Pentium dual-core T3200

Basic parameters. Adaptation type Notebook.

FSB 667MHz

Interface type socket 754

Number of cores: Dual-core.

The main frequency L2 cache is 1024kb

General-purpose register data width 64 bits.

Production process 65 nm.

Stepspeed SupportStepSpeedTDP Supports TDP

Codename: Merom

Instruction set: mmx SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE3 EM64T Core Speed: 1000MHz

Multiplier: Intel T5800

Intel Core dual-core CPU

Manufacturer: Intel

CPU Model: Intel Core2 Duo T5800 Core Frequency:

Number of cores: 2

Core Type: Merom

Interface Type: Socket P

64-bit technology: Yes.

L2 cache: 2MB

FSB: 800MHz

CPU External Frequency: 166MHz

Production process: The main performance gap between the two is in the L2 cache and front-end bus. For the L2 cache, the notebook does not need much L2 cache to process, there is a gap between the front-end bus, but the actual application only has an impact on the working frequency of the memory, T3200 only supports DDR2-667, and T5800 can support DDR2-800, but the actual application can not be seen, the gap between the two is no more than 5%. However, there is a gap of hundreds or even thousands of yuan between the laptops of these two processors, and it can be considered that the T3200 is more worth buying.

But if you're looking for performance, you can choose the T5800.

In fact, for those of you who don't know about computers, you can't feel the difference between the two, how much is the difference? It's really not a good analogy

However, in terms of processing speed, the former has an advantage over the latter But you can see that the former uses 65nm technology, which consumes more power and produces more heat The latter is better at 45nm **If the difference is not big, you are not afraid of power consumption and heat generation, so choose T5800

**There are too many discrepancies Then it's better to change to a t3200 to use my Lenovo after-sales service, I hope it will help you

Other configurations are basically the same, and there is basically no big difference in ordinary use.

Their front-end buses are different,T5800 is 800,T3200 is 667,Of course, it's T5800's good pull,If you want to say that there is a lot of difference,In fact, it's not too good to use it.,There is a difference in evaluation scores。

The 5800 front section bus is 800, the L2 cache is 2m, and the production process is 65nm, which is a Core 2 dual-core.

The 3200 front-end bus is 667, the second-level cache is 1m, and the production process is 45nm, which is a Pentium dual-core.

If you don't have high requirements for the computer, buy the 3200 one, the advanced production process, the power consumption is saving, and the calorific value is low.