Can the Besturn dual core T3200 play C9

I can play, but the effect is not complete, and I can't open the highest.

Don't worry,T3200 Although it's an old CPU,But the performance is very good,But a lot of games can't be played with win7,I don't know what's going on,,Anyway, your configuration is no problem playing this game,,,9400GT A lot of cards are fake,,If the card is the effect is minimized,,Anyway, I'm not interested in 9400,I bought a 9400GT,Come back to test,64bit,64m,,I wanted to smash the card at the time,,,Fortunately, the boss is good Give me a refund.。。。

If you're worried about your CPU, I'll tell you,,, this CPU is fine, it's much stronger than the single-core P4, and the performance is not a grade,,, so the end result is to be able to play.

No problem, do you know how big World of Warcraft is? The World of Warcraft client in my computer is now a total of altogether.,It's estimated that it's about 6G after installation.,And whether you can play it or not has nothing to do with the size of the client.。 Your graphics card is okay.,The CPU is the lowest frequency.,When you play big games, the CPU will automatically speed up.,What's the matter with the T-series CPUs is also core.。

I guess you'll have no problem turning on medium effects.

It's not the same thing to be able to play with the effect, and the main explanation of the building is to open the effect, and this graphics card is struggling

OK. Better than mine,

The stupid hat on the first floor, I can't even tell the difference between the Pentium D and the current Pentium dual-core of the Core series, this is insight? It's almost ready to be viewed in a museum of human history.

The Pentium dual-core is a product of reducing the L2 cache on the basis of the Core 1, because the Core 2** is too high, so the L2 cache is reduced, competing with AMD's Turion series.

Although the L2 cache is slightly less, the total listening performance is very good, not only is it not inferior to AMD's products of the same grade, but even only compared to the core 2 of the same frequency, only slightly worse, and the average user does not feel any difference.

For example, the core is also Merom, and the main frequency is Pentium dual-core T3200, which is only less than the Core 2 dual-core T5750 (3DMark score), which is better than the performance of the main frequency and even better than T5800, T7250, T7300, not below T6400. The T4300 outperforms the T6400 and P7350 and is only slightly lower than the T6500.

It's still good, this series of CPUs is mainly aimed at the low-end market, and the game performance is also very good for users who are not very demanding. The cost performance is very high, and some products are 45nm process, and the power consumption control is lower. Overall it's worth buying.

Good performance!

However, AMD is now out of the Pterodactyl II 240 ** only 400 is very cost-effective, compared to the Pentium dual-core has no advantage!

Pentium dual-core is divided into 4 categories, 90nm PD 8 series, not to mention, the failure of the 65nm PD9 process improvement, but it is still a failure of the dual-core, 65nm PE2 series, the low-end of the year, but the main frequency is generally too low, the main models are E2140 E2160 E2180 E2200, E2220

45nm PE 2 series and 5 series, 2 series seems to have only 2 models, but they are all out of the market, E5 series has E5200 E5300 E5400 Recently PE6300

6500k, etc., suitable for home use, enough for general users.

The CPU of the G550 is Celeron's, and now the general configuration does not require any nameplates. Of course, if you have a high budget, if your current computer is equipped with this configuration, you can play a game that is just like that. In addition to that rental guess to change some super stand-alone games,。

Most online games can be run. Hope.

I feel that Celeron is better, and 4 cores are the best.

Pentium and Core are better.

The Pentium dual-core and the Core dual-core are the same, while the Celeron belongs to the simplified version of the Pentium, which has high heat dissipation and poor performance.

It's definitely the Core 2, which uses a new architecture and instructions, and is better than the Pentium Dual-Core in all aspects!

Refer to it for yourself

Processor Model, Architecture, Frequency, Front-Side Bus, L2 Cache, Instruction Set, Process, Power Consumption.

Celeron Dual Core T1600 Merom 667MHz 1MB SSE3 65Nm 35W

Celeron Dual Core T1700 Merom 667MHz 1MB SSE3 65Nm 35W

Processor Model, Architecture, Frequency, Front-Side Bus, L2 Cache, Instruction Set, Process, Power Consumption.

Pentium Dual-Core T3200 Merom 667MHz 1MB SSE3 65Nm 35W

Pentium Dual-Core T3400 Merom 667MHz 1MB SSE3 65Nm 35W

Pentium dual-core loss-loss friend T4200 Panryn 800MHz 1MB SSE4 45nm 35W

Processor Model: Qiaodan, Architecture, Frequency, FSB, L2 Cache, Instruction Set, Process, Power Consumption.

Core 2 Duo T5800 Merom 800MHz 2MB SSE3 65nm 35W

Core 2 Duo T6400 Panryn 800MHz 2MB SSE4 45nm 35W

Core 2 Duo T6600 Panryn 800MHz 2MB SSE4 45nm 35W

Processor Model, Architecture, Frequency, Front-Side Bus, L2 Cache, Instruction Set, Process, Power Consumption.

Core 2 Duo P7350 Penryn 1066MHz 3MB 45nm 25W

Core 2 Duo P7450 Penryn 1066MHz 3MB 45nm 25W

Core 2 Duo P8400 Penryn 1066MHz 3MB 45nm 25W

The T series has a higher power consumption than the P series, but the technology is not bad; The P series is the Centrino 2 platform, and the T series is the Centrino Huaichi platform, although the manufacturing process is more advanced than before, and some new functions have been added, which reduces the power consumption, and the actual performance is not as strong as Intel advocates, so it is recommended to choose the cost-effective T series.

No special case is the Core 2

Both upstairs were talking nonsense. I can't get used to this kind of person who doesn't know how to pretend to understand and mislead people's children.

There is no difference between the Pentium Dual Core and the Core 2. The architecture is exactly the same. In fact, the Pentium dual-core belongs to Intel's low-end products. The mid-to-high-end product is called Core 2, including dual-core and quad-core. The low-end product is called Celeron and has dual-core and single-core.

The difference between the main frequency of Core dual-core and Pentium dual-core is not very big. At the same time, the main frequency of the mid-to-high-end notebook Core 2 dual-core T6500 and P7450 is the same, which is the same as the T4300 Pentium dual-core.

Upstairs said that there is a difference in external frequency, which is purely false. The external frequency of P7450, T6500, and T4300 is exactly the same, and the older generation of Besturn dual-core T3200 and Core dual-core T5750 are also exactly the same. The Pentium dual-core E5200 and E7300 for desktops also have exactly the same external frequency.

Secondly, even if there is a difference in the external frequency, as long as the main frequency is the same, the performance is exactly the same. The external frequency has no effect on the performance, but the external frequency is high, and it is easier to overclock. But laptops can't be overclocked.

In the case of the same main frequency, the Besturn dual-core T4200 is only 3% slower than the Core 2 dual-core T6400, and the T3200 is 5% slower than the T5800 (the reason for the slightly larger gap is because the front-end bus of T3200 is only 667, T5800 has 800, and T4200 and T6400 have the same front-end bus), T3400 is faster than T6400 because of its high main frequency. Yes, at the same frequency, the Core 2, which has a slightly higher L2 cache, is a little faster, but not much different.

In my opinion, if it is not for the pursuit of the highest computing speed, it is more than enough to buy a Pentium dual-core like the T4300 (notebook) and E5300 (desktop). Although T6400 and T6500 have high L2 cache and faster speed, they are not a little faster, but they are a lot more expensive, which is purely chicken ribs. If you pursue high speed, you should buy high-end Core 2 like T8500 and P8400, because their main frequency is high (mainly not high L2 cache), and the speed will be significantly improved, but I think that even with the huge ** difference brought by this, the cost performance of these processors is still far lower than that of Pentium dual-core.

The external frequency of the Core is 266 and the dual cores of the Pentium series are below 200. This determines the CPU with the same frequency, and his main frequency will be 33% higher. There's also the difference between L2 caches.

The core ones are generally above 3m; The Pentium dual-core is generally 2M, which is a low-end product in the dual-core. For the power consumption problem, it is actually related to the structure of the CPU, not as simple as 20%. Generally, the current desktop dual-core CPU power is greater than or equal to 65W.

frequency doubling and manufacturing process.

2G RAM + 256MB discrete graphics card is absolutely no problem. CPU performance is decent.

As a low-end model, the actual performance of the Besturn dual-core T3200 is not as weak as we initially thought, in fact, it is only a 14% performance gap compared to the P7350, and this gap is almost imperceptible in daily applications. Since there are no maps, please refer to the specific data.

And in order to better understand the actual performance of the new processor, we first check its basic parameters through the cpuid of the everest software before conducting the test.

As the first product of the T4000 series of Pentium dual-core processors, the T4200 is positioned at a frequency of 1MB L2 cache and 800MHz front-side bus, and uses a 45nm manufacturing process Penryn core, which is no different from the Core 2 dual-core processor specified by the earlier Santa Rosa Refresh platform except for the L2 cache.

CPUID processor parameters.

We tested the performance of this processor in real terms with PCMARK05 and SISsoft Sandra2009.

The manufacturing process is from 65nm to 45nm, and the core architecture is from MEROM to Penryn cores, we think that it is of little practical significance to compare the T4000 series with the previous generation T3000 after the upgraded specifications, and the T4200 should be on par with the low-end Core 2 processor, so we selected several representative Core 2 dual-core processors in the test.

pcmark05 test results.

T3200 T4200 T5800 T6400 P7350, the main frequency of the above processors is, through the test results, except for the P7350 with 3MB L2 cache and 1066MHz front-side bus, the rest of the performance in the PCMARK05 processor test is not much different, and the main frequency is slightly higher T3400 (the performance is stronger than them, which shows that the main frequency has a greater impact on performance for Intel processors.

CPU logic operation performance test.

CPU multi-** performance test.

CPU encoding performance test.

In the three tests of SISosoft Sandra2009, the Intel Pentium dual-core T4200 processor performed satisfactorily in the logic operation, multi-core and coding performance tests, and it was not far behind the Core 2 dual-core T6400. Of course, T6400 supports instruction set, while T4200 only supports SSE3, and there is a certain gap in multi-processing performance.

The mainstream notebooks are now T5800 and T3200, contemporaries. But 5800 is expensive, it is core2, and 3200 is Pentium. It's okay.

The 5800 is a 2M L2 cache and the 3200 is 1m. The main frequency, it's already good, if it's not a big task, it can't be shown, and the cost performance is also very high. T3200, 2g, 160g, 8400gs is about 4700 yuan.

Mine is the T3200's. It feels okay.

Now with dual cores? If the economic conditions allow, you can go directly to the amd9550 quad-core for a thousand dollars, and if the budget is relatively tight, you can go to the 8450 triple-core dual-core is outdated, comrade.