5200 or X2 240 Which CPU is better.

Updated on number 2024-08-08
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    240 5200+ The newer, the better.

    Thermal Design Power The smaller the thermal design power, the better.

    65w 65w

    The smaller the craft, the better.

    45 nm 65 nm.

    Frequency: Frequency.

    2900MHz 2700MHz The higher the better.

    Cache The bigger the cache, the better.

    l1 128kb l1 64kb

    l2 2m l2 512kb

    Bus Frequency The higher the bus frequency, the better.

    2000mhz 1000mhz

    Support DDR3 Does not support DDR3 Of course it is well supported.

    rmb rmb

    Fill-in-the-blank questions (hehe).

    Glance!!!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    With a computer, you can't just think about the CPU to look at the overall configuration, to be stable and energy-saving on Intel, otherwise AMD only says E5200 and AMD240CPU, in terms of performance, AMD240 is good, but it depends on how the overall configuration is.

    The specific situation depends on the specific situation.

    Are you using Intel E5200 compared to AMD 240.

    If you compare the AMD5200+ with the AMD240, the AMD5200+ and the AMD240 are not on the same level at all.

    The AMD240 despises the AMD5200+, which is not comparable at all.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    The X2 240 station has the advantages of new manufacturing technology, low heat generation, and strong performance, that is, the motherboard is more expensive than the 5200+.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    It's better than 240! However, the landlord's motherboard also needs to be supported! If you are upgrading to a motherboard with 770 or less than AMD5200+ If you are a new user, 240 is recommended!

    The 240 is better than the AMD5200+ in terms of parameters and architecture.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Don't hesitate to go directly to the 240 bar, 45nm process, the heat is also lower than 5200+, and it also integrates DDR3 memory controller, which is cost-effective. The CPU interface of the motherboard should be an AM3 interface. My board doesn't support the CPU of the Athlon IIX2 240, otherwise I would have to feel the performance improvement of the 45nm Athlon.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    X2 240, 45nm new architecture.

    In the case of similar frequencies, the hardware of the new architecture is preferred.

    In addition, you can choose the X245 with little difference.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    240 is better in every way, and it must be 240

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Buy 245 counts. 20 bucks more expensive. A motherboard with a 240 will definitely perform better than a motherboard with a 5200. And it's pretty much the same. At the same price, the performance of the whole machine is better than that of 240.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Dizzy, do you still have to ask, 5200+ is Santana, 240 is Buick, which one do you say is better.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The X2450 is equivalent to the second-generation i5. The AMD Athlon™ X2450 uses the AMD 10 microarchitecture, and unlike the Phenom series, none of the ATHLONII processors have L3 cache, but the old 512KBL2 cache per core is increased to 1MB per core, and the quad-core is still 512KB. In addition, Athlonii's dual-core products are natively designed quad-core systems with a listed part of the non-existent, i.e., not by shielding two of the cores of a quad-core processor, hence the TDP power consumption of the processor.

    It is also lower than the phenomii series.

    x2450 performanceThe x2450 is a desktop processor that can often be found on the most modest desktops. It can be classified as a mid-range desktop processor that handles daily computing tasks well. For heavier tasks, it is recommended to use at least a mid-range processor such as the Amdryzen or Intelcorei series.

    The performance of the X2450 is similar to that of the more popular AMdryzen 33200 3250U. The main difference between them is that the athlon is a dual-core processor with two compute threads per core.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Basic parameters.

    Type of application. Desktop manufacturer.

    AMDCPU series.

    athlon64 x2

    CPU frequency.

    CPU frequency.

    3000mhz

    CPU external frequency.

    200mhz

    CPU multiplier.

    15 times the bus frequency.

    2000mhz

    CPU slot.

    Slot type. socket am3

    Number of pins. 938pin

    CPU cores.

    Number of cores. Dual-core manufacturing process.

    45 nm.

    Core type. regor

    CPU architecture.

    Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP).

    65W core voltage.

    CPU caching.

    L1 cache. 2×128kb

    L2 caching. 2MB technical data.

    instruction set mmx(+)3dnow!(+sse,sse2,sse3,sse4a,x86-64

    Virtualization technology.

    amd vt

    64-bit processor.

    Yes other parameters.

    Operating temperature 74

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    <> "Equivalent to Pentium Dual-Core E6800, Celeron Dual-Core G555, Celeron Dual-Core G1610 Performance AMD X2 280 is Athlon Dual-Core, X2 is Dual-Core, X4 is Quad-Core, such as a very famous quad-core AMD CPU, Athlon II X4 860K.

    ii is the second generation.

    X4 is the four cores.

    860k is the model number.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    e5500 is better, 250 is the main frequency, for AMD, compatibility will also be changed in the future, and the AM3+ interface will not work in the future.

  14. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The AMD Athlonon II X2 250 is better than the E5500. AMD Athlons have excellent upgrade performance and compatibility performance, AMD Athlons II X2 250 interface is DDR3, with great upgrade potential, while E5500 is DDR2, Intel's original advantages: power consumption, in the case of AMD continuous improvement of the process, the power consumption and heating gap between Athlon™ dual-core and E5500 has been very small.

    And AMD's integrated display is also much stronger than Intel, so it is highly recommended for landlords to use AMD Athlon II X2 250

  15. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It is best to choose AMD to play the game.

Related questions
7 answers2024-08-08

Although it is a 45nm CPU, it is compatible with the previous 940AM2 interface.

4 answers2024-08-08

Of course, it is the strength of the computer, which can be upgraded to a high performance, many mobile phones are fixed capacity, and they cannot be upgraded, and the computer is much better.

5 answers2024-08-08

1,52 performance improvements.

Level 2 cache is a bottleneck 52 ultra depending on the relationship between your external frequency and the frequency doubling. >>>More

10 answers2024-08-08

E5200 Okay.

The reason is simple: the E5200 has a 2M cache, and the 2180 has only 1M, and the E5200 is a 45nm architecture, and the execution efficiency is slightly better than that of the 65 E2180, and the most important thing is that the E5200 has a high clock speed, while the 2180 has it. >>>More

8 answers2024-08-08

Strengths. The advantages of Intel processors are that they are technologically advanced, high-tech, more in line with the concept of the future, stable in work, fast, cooler and environmentally friendly, more power-efficient, and quieter fans. >>>More