There are only teachers who can t teach, and there are no students who can t learn well. Is this a b

Yes, this is really a big statement, many students really don't like to learn, and no matter how much the teacher teaches, it's useless.

I don't think it's a big deal, after all, every student is the same, and as long as the teacher can find the right teaching method, they can improve their academic performance.

It's not that it's too much, because it's true, and if the teacher's education method is correct, then he can teach very good children.

The article is well written. It's a pity that I didn't look at today's education out of the box. The contradiction in education today is not in the teachers, but in the educational philosophy and the educational assessment system.

I'm sure no one who has ever been a teacher would say that!

People who have never been a teacher can't think of that kind of hard work and helplessness.

I think that "there are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach well" is inappropriate, students also have various levels, there are also various differences, education and teaching is the result of interaction, the role of teachers can not be underestimated, but if you blindly emphasize, and even put the responsibility on the teacher, it is bound to cause a lot of pressure on the teacher, I think for the teacherMental healthThere are also ***. Only by working together among students, teachers, parents, and society can we truly run education well and cultivate qualified new-type citizens who can adapt to society.

As we all know, there are many factors that affect the effectiveness of education, and any link in the social environment, family environment and school education may become negative factors affecting the effect of education, and the success of school education depends on the organic combination of school, society and family. Because of this, it is not difficult to understand why family variation is often not good for children's development; Why pornography, gambling, drugs and other undesirable phenomena in society affect the healthy growth of young people?

Schooling is not a panacea. As educators, they are often powerless to do things beyond their own ability and responsibility, and can only do their own things as well as possible within the scope of their abilities. In a word, all the responsibility for education is put on the teacher, which is obviously against the law of education.

Dialectics. It is believed that the development of things is the result of the joint action of internal and external factors.

Internal causes are the source and driving force of the development and change of things, external causes are the conditions for the development and change of things, and external causes act through internal causes. Students in the same class should receive the same educational information, but after the students interpret and process this information and become part of their respective knowledge systems, the results are not very different, and the emotional experiences they get are also different, why? In addition to the objective differences in receptivity and intelligence level, the main role is played by the internal factors, which are the students themselves, and the teacher's education can only play a role through the internalization of the students.

And "there are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach", overemphasizing the influence of external factors and ignoring the decisive role of internal factors; Ignoring the subjective initiative of students.

Students are seen as works waiting to be sculpted, and only by carving them on the outside can they become works of art. It cannot but be said that this is an idealization of the object of education and the educational environment.

I think the meaning of this sentence is that the way we treat children's education is very important, so there are no students who can't teach, only teachers who can't teach.

This sentence is particularly in favor of educating students, if they can use the right method, the child will eventually have a great result in learning.

Some students' grades are not particularly good, which is directly related to the teacher's teaching method, and sometimes the quality of the teacher's teaching will affect the child's learning.

I think the meaning of this sentence is that teachers are very important to students, and if you can meet a good teacher, you will definitely teach students well.

I don't think this sentence is right, such words are very unfair to teachers, and there are some students whose attitudes are problematic, and teachers can't teach well.

This is particularly true if a teacher is particularly responsible in life. It will make a student have a particularly high grade in life.

I think that's very true. Because if the level of the teacher is very high, then the student will be able to have better grades and level.

"There are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach", this sentence first came from the mouth of the old educator Chen Heqin, which is one of his important educational concepts. Many teachers have taken this sentence as their motto and fought for it all their lives.

There are no students who can't be taught well", which reflects the view of students - students can be "taught well". As the object of education, any student must first admit that he can be educated, that he can grow and progress through education, and that he is not "rotten wood that cannot be carved".

There are only teachers who can't teach", which is an incentive for teachers to constantly improve the level of education. Not everyone is suitable to be a teacher. But among the people who are suitable for being teachers, there are definitely teachers who can't teach and teachers who can't teach well.

This sentence was first proposed by Mr. Chen Heqin, a well-known expert in children's education in modern times. He is known as the "saint of children's education", and Tao Xingzhi, Yan Yangchu, and Huang Yanpei are known as the four saints in China's education circle. His original intention is to hope that teachers will continue to improve their education level, cherish every student, and teach students according to their aptitude.

He believes that the key to education lies in the ability and quality of teachers, not the talents and abilities of students. He believes that every student has their own strengths and potentials, and it is the responsibility of teachers to help students discover and discover these potentials, as well as provide the necessary guidance and support.

The meaning of this sentence is that if a student encounters a problem or difficulty in learning, it should not simply be blamed on the student himself, but should reflect on the adequacy of the teacher's teaching methods and abilities. Education is a complex process that requires mutual cooperation, mutual understanding, and mutual respect between teachers and students to achieve the best teaching results.

Therefore, teachers should continuously improve their teaching ability and quality, and strive to provide students with a better educational environment and more effective teaching methods. At the same time, students also need to be actively involved in their studies and strive to reach their potential and talents. Only when teachers and students work together can we truly help students discover their strengths and potentials so that they can continue to progress in their learning.

There are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach are what Chen Heqin said.

Chen Heqin, a famous educator, said: "There are no students who can't teach, only teachers who can't teach." As soon as these words came out, the audience applauded.

This famous quote comes from Mr. Chen Heqin, a famous expert in children's education in modern times. This sentence was originally just a sentence used by Mr. Chen Heqin to encourage himself, and the original meaning was to hope that teachers would continue to improve their education level, cherish every student, and teach students according to their aptitude. Maybe Mr. Chen Heqin himself didn't expect that this sentence was "taken out of context" by some education managers and regarded as a golden rule for demanding teachers, and a large number of front-line teachers were defeated with one rod.

It was said by an educator named Chen Heqin.

But that's absolutely true. The role of the teacher is exaggerated and the complexity of the student side is ignored.

Taking out this sentence as a famous quote to spur teachers has played a great negative role and is not easy to advocate.

It is still necessary to take into account both teachers and students, interdependence, and joint efforts to achieve good results in education.

What do you think, friend?

I think the meaning of this sentence is that if the student can't learn the knowledge, it must be the teacher's responsibility, and the relationship between the student and the teacher is very close, so we must study hard.

I think this sentence is very reasonable, if the teacher's teaching level is very high, and can educate the child in the right way, this can promote the child's achievement.

The meaning of this sentence is that when teachers educate children, if they use the right methods, even the most stupid students can learn things.

I don't agree with this sentence, and because if you want to educate a child well, in addition to school education, family education is also very important, in addition, if the child's intention to learn actively is weak, and the ability to learn independently is poor, even if the results are improved in a short period of time due to the supervision of parents and teachers, then after losing the discipline of parents and teachers, it will quickly decline, or even worse than the original. Therefore, whether a child can be taught well cannot only depend on the teacher, after all, education is not omnipotent, and a person's nature and environment also determine his future development. This sentence can be used for teachers' self-humility, but it should never be used as a basis for parents to morally kidnap teachers.

Whether a student can learn well or not is the most important thing is whether he has the willingness to take the initiative to learn, and a person is willing to take the initiative to learn, even if there is no supervision from teachers and parents, through a period of hard work, his grades can also be improved. However, if a student does not have the willingness to take the initiative to learn, it will be difficult for the teacher to teach him well, no matter how much effort the teacher puts in. Successful education is inseparable from the subjective efforts of individuals, the good atmosphere of the environment, the full support of the family and the full teaching of the teacher, these factors can work together to produce good results, if only expect the teacher to unilaterally pay is difficult to achieve the expected results.

In fact, it is very simple to refute this sentence, we only need to make an assumption. If there is a teacher who can teach, he can successfully impart knowledge to every student 100%, then his students will also be able to learn the ability of "100% teaching students", and so on and so on, layer by layer, people all over the world should be able to master this skill, but the reality is obviously not like this. Therefore, this sentence is a blind exaggeration of the role of education, education is not omnipotent, and teachers cannot be kidnapped simply because of such a sentence.

In fact, many parents are well aware of this truth, but in order to escape the responsibility for their own educational failures, they blame all this on the lack of good teachers, and try to morally kidnap teachers through this sentence, but this is obviously not helpful in educating children.

Introduction: I think that there are no students who can't teach, only teachers who can't teach, this sentence is somewhat biased in contemporary society, this sentence is said by the famous educator Mr. Chen Heqin, this sentence has been used by many educational circles, and has also caused a lot of controversy. In fact, this sentence is just a sentence that the old gentleman used to encourage himself, but this sentence has had a great impact on many teachers, and has also misled a large number of parents who do not know how to educate, and has also had a certain impact on teaching.

Student education. Of course, every student can be educated, and it is possible to make the student better and improve through education, which is correct, but teaching this matter well is not absolute, you must know that there are differences between students, and each student's thinking and learning level are extremely different. If it is only from the original basis of the student to let the student have progress, it is better, but it is very difficult to make the student more excellent or achieve some success, which is also a wrong teaching process in the mind, but also a direction of the process, the teacher needs to pay attention to the aptitude of teaching, step by step, but the teacher is not omnipotent, can not ** to the growth of every student, so if this sentence is used in the contemporary era, there will be a certain pressure on the teacher.

Avoid kidnapping teachers too much.

In fact, many parents will complain that the teacher thinks that after handing over the child to the teacher, but the child's own grades have not improved, and there is no growth, in fact, the child's education and growth can not be completed in a short period of time, and there will be certain differences in the growth of each child, so it should be specific to each child's body, if a child has a shortcoming that has been changed, then the child must have progressed, and it is also necessary to affirm the teacher's dedication.

Summary. In the end, there are no students who can't teach, only teachers who can't teach, this sentence can be used as a creed for many teachers to motivate, but this cannot require teachers to become a standard, nor can they be harsh on teachers with this sentence, which is also very unfair to teachers.

I agree with this sentence, because teachers need to teach students according to their specific situation. If a student's academic performance is not good, there must be something wrong with the way of education.

I don't agree, most of my classmates may have strong learning ability, but there are some children who are born with defects.

I very much agree with this sentence because I think students have great potential, mainly because there are many teachers who will give up on students and cannot find the corresponding educational rules.