How about defense economics, come and hear it

Updated on amusement 2024-08-02
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    Defense economic employment direction.

    1. Employment destinations:

    1. ** and the country's national defense department, PLA equipment and logistics department;

    2. Military trade companies and military enterprises;

    3. Colleges and universities and scientific research institutions.

    2. Employment Prospects:

    In recent years, the economic efficiency of China's national defense construction has been continuously improved, but there are still some problems that cannot be ignored

    For example, the ratio of personnel costs to equipment costs and R&D expenses is unreasonable, the proportion of investment in national defense scientific research is relatively low, and the proportion of maintenance expenses is as high as 2 3;

    Another example is the irrational cost structure of the military branches. To solve these problems, one of the key points is to increase the intensity of investment in the building of the contingent of qualified personnel and strive to bring up a large number of high-quality new-type military personnel.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    The defense economics of the People's Republic of China was born in the mid-80s of the 20th century. At that time, under the background of the subordination of the army and national defense construction to the national economic construction, how to coordinate the relationship between national defense construction and economic construction became a major issue of concern to scholars, which gave birth to the new China's national defense economics.

    In the more than 20 years since the development of New China, national defense economics has produced relatively fruitful results. In solving practical problems, we have always taken the needs of national defense and security as the focus of our theoretical research on national defense economy, actively participated in the research of the state, the army, and relevant ministries and commissions, and provided a large amount of policy advice for the decision-making of relevant departments and the headquarters of the Central Military Commission.

    In the construction of disciplines, it has accumulated considerable literature and materials, translated a number of Western works on defense economics, and published a number of modern national defense economics textbooks, laying a solid foundation for the establishment of national defense economics with Chinese characteristics.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    -- Gradually introducing the market mechanism into the construction of the national defense economy. The implementation of a single mode of planning, administrative allocation, and allocation is a basic characteristic of China's traditional national defense economic system. Under such a system, there will inevitably be a hunger for speed, quantitative expansion, and investment, which will lead to inefficient resource allocation and wasteful use.

    Since the beginning of reform and opening up, there have been a variety of measures to promote the reform of the national defense economic structure, but the overall goal is to move toward the socialist market economy, from relying solely on administrative means to allocate resources to giving full play to the role of the market in the allocation of national defense economic resources. Continuously promoting market-oriented reform in the field of national defense economy is conducive to promoting the effective integration of resource allocation with national defense demand, effectively and flexibly adjusting the existing allocation situation, and maximizing the efficiency of resource allocation in the national defense economy.

    Take the path of military-civilian integrated development. China's traditional national defense economy is a military-civilian separation development model, the division between military and civilian is obvious, the national defense economic construction is out of touch with economic and social development, and the national defense science and technology industry is separated from the overall circulation circle of the national economy, forming a situation of "self-contained, self-enclosed, excessively detailed division of labor, and military-civilian separation", resulting in low efficiency in the use of national defense economic resources. Since the beginning of reform and opening up, the national defense economy has embarked on a road of military-civilian integration development, integrating the development of national defense science, technology and industry into the overall plan for economic and social development, into the market economy, and into the national economic system including the private economy, supporting the construction of national defense and the armed forces with the strength of the country's overall economy and science and technology, and realizing the organic unity of economic, military and social benefits.

    The new national defense science, technology and industrial system has achieved the glory of the "Shen V" and "Shen VI" of the national defense science and technology industry and the "Chang'e-1" lunar exploration. From a single response to a war to peacetime service, emergency response, and wartime response, the national economic mobilization system with dual functions has shown its skills in major emergencies such as the Wenchuan earthquake relief and has made outstanding achievements. From a closed system and segmentation to the integration of the three services, compatibility between the military and the people, and integration of peacetime and wartime, the logistics support of the modern army interprets the new meaning of "strong support".

    Self-reliance has always been the fundamental foothold of the development of the national defense economy. Under the condition that there is still a clear gap between China and the world's advanced level, the introduction of advanced foreign technology is an important way to speed up the pace of structural adjustment and technological innovation in the national defense industry, but the foothold of China's national defense economic development is still self-reliance. Relying only on the introduction of foreign technology, China's military technology development can only forever follow the Western powers, and fall into a vicious circle of "buying, eliminating, and buying."

    Therefore, we must take the road of independent innovation with Chinese characteristics, enhance the ability of independent innovation, strive to master more core technologies with independent intellectual property rights in key fields, and realize the transformation from "introduction and imitation" to "independent innovation".

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Since the birth of the state, the national defense economy has accompanied human society, influenced the development of history, and also prompted people to think about the war economy and other military economic activities from various angles. During the Renaissance, the Florentine statesman Niccolò Machiavelli said, "Whoever has more money in his purse will win the war."

    However, as a whole discipline, modern defense economics began in 1960. The book "Defense Economics in the Nuclear Age" co-authored by the famous American scholars Charles J. Hitch and Roland McRoyal Keane opened the prelude to the development of modern defense economics.

    The emergence and development of the town of defense economics has made important contributions to the development of modern economics. Last year's Nobel laureate in economics, Thomas Schelling, reshaped the paradigm of analysis of human interaction behavior when he studied conflict and national defense. In terms of research methods, game theory, which is a sharper analytical method than traditional economic theory, breaks the error of neoclassical economics in ignoring the analysis of human economic behavior on the basis of rational economic man assumptions, complete markets, and perfect information, and provides a more realistic perspective for economic policy research and orientation.

Related questions
12 answers2024-08-02

If I want to say that economics is teaching a way of thinking, because the foundation of economics is the most extensive and comprehensive, economics undergraduates will learn all business subjects, except for macro and micro, which the whole college will learn, and mathematics, which is the basic discipline of mathematics, such as high number line algebraic probability theory, accounting, international trade, industrial economics, and finance, which are all learning contents. Therefore, it is easy for you to understand the general picture of the whole business course, although the specific details are not clear, and I think this is why banks prefer economics and finance when recruiting new people, rather than accounting as a visual major.

7 answers2024-08-02

I think that studying economics must not simply read books, and many undergraduate graduates who have studied economics and finance do not have a basic understanding of China's economy and international economy, and even economic theories cannot be fully grasped, and they cannot justify themselves when they explain to others. >>>More

14 answers2024-08-02

It's okay, you can learn more about their introduction.

10 answers2024-08-02

There are many angles to this question, and they all make sense. I'll try to put my opinion on it from a macroeconomic point of view, and the answer is up to you. >>>More

3 answers2024-08-02

Microeconomics is a more cumbersome subject, if you want to learn, it is best to have rigorous thinking logic, because the things studied in this discipline are microscopic, unlike language, you memorize well, memorize and remember, we learn knowledge not only to remember what we have learned, but also to know how to use the knowledge we have learned, as long as the rote things are used flexibly, it is not difficult to make it live. Short-answer questions generally don't memorize concepts, and those that need to memorize concepts are those noun explanation questions. At that time, not many of us took the exam, and at that time, microeconomics was not as well developed as it is now. >>>More