Which is better, the Dragon II X6 1055T or the Core i5 750? about CPU .

AMD's high-end CPUs really don't work. Even with six cores, it doesn't change much. Intel's i5 750 beats all of AMD's CPUs

Whether it's good or not is not to look at its advertised content, but to look at the actual application to comment. When the six-core 1065T first came out, many ** were compared with i3. As a result, it's not much better than the i3.

i5 people don't go to compare at all Of course, AMD's CPU is cheap! The low-end AMD platform is especially recommended and the price-performance ratio is very good. High-end users are not bad for money, so AMD's CPU is cheap and not attractive.

After all, people pay for performance.

AMD's six-core processor performance is really good, but the single-task performance does not necessarily exceed that of the i5-750, but the current system and software cannot play the full performance of the 6-core.

With "AMD Phenom II high-end six-core (six-thread) processor + AMD 890 series high-end chipset motherboard + ATI (AMD) Radeon HD 5800 series or above graphics card" to form AMD's third-generation high-end "3A" platform - "Lion" platform, the performance should be stronger than the Intel Core i5 750 quad-core four-thread processor platform.

Multitasking AMD strong game i5 is better.

It's definitely the i5750 okay.

The x61055t just has two more cores than its own 965.

With automatic overclocking.

The main frequency is not the same) and the others are the same.

The frameworks are all old.

Intel's i-series, on the other hand, uses a new architecture.

Super powerful.

And now x6

1055t ** too expensive 1799-1900 too.

If it drops to 1600.

Then you can buy it.

It's still worth borrowing money to buy a 6-core.

Of course, it's on the i7, and I'm also a meal, but it's really inferior to Intel in the high-end AMD. As the saying goes, choose AMD for the low-end and Intel for the high-end. The following is a quote from Zhongguancun evaluation i5 2300 and x6 1055t:

At the end of the end, the author wrote with the Core i5 2300 winning the pen, which is not to say that the Core i5 2300 completely defeated the Phenom II six-core 1090T, but it is an indisputable fact that it easily defeated the Phenom II quad-core 965. As for why I followed the Core i5 2300 to achieve victory, I would like you to explain it to you.

The Core i5 2300, although it is a new star in the Intel camp, already has the strength to challenge the opponent's higher-end processors. Although it did not win all the battles, it was able to match AMD's six-core processor in terms of applications, and the project won by the Phenom II six-core 1090T was only a small victory. Compared to the Phenom II quad-core 965, the Core i5 2300 has basically taken it out of mind.

With the exception of a few test categories that can be tied or won by a small margin, the other categories are no match for the Core i5 2300 at all. What's more, the frequency gap between the two has reached 600MHz, which shows that these elite generals in the AMD camp are really a little old.

Through the above comparison, the Intel Core i7-2600 is much better than the AMD Yilong X6 1055T. After all, ** is also there. The Intel Core i7-2600 is several hundred dollars more expensive.

Just look at the price.

Of course, some applications of Yilong X6 can be eaten more openly, after all**in**.

But it's probably not a game.