Xiao Ming is ten years old this year, is his height 136 square centimeters or square decimeters or s

Xiao Ming is ten years old and 136 cm tall.

Square meters, square decimeters, square centimeters, is a unit of area.

A centimeter is a unit of length or height.

Neither square centimeters nor square decimeters nor square meters, square centimeters square meters These are units that represent the area, and height is a unit of height, which should be centimeters, so the height of ten-year-old Xiao Ming is 136 centimeters.

Height is usually described in terms of length units, and length units are generally meters, centimeters, millimeters, etc. Square centimeters, square decimeters, and square meters are units of area that describe the area on a flat surface. Therefore, Xiao Ming's height is not 136 square centimeters, square decimeters, or square meters.

Under normal circumstances, Xiao Ming's height should be about 136 centimeters, meters, or about 4 feet 6 inches (if you use imperial units). If it is a different unit of length, it needs to be converted accordingly.

His height is neither a square centimeter, nor a square decimeter, nor a square meter, because these are units of area. It should be said that 136 centimeters. That's the height!

Height 136 cm.

Square centimeters, square decimeters, square meters are units of area.

Xiao Ming is ten years old this year, is his height 136 square centimeters or square decimeters or square meters?

Xiao Ming is ten years old this year, and his height should be 136 cm.

The answer is that Xiao Ming is ten years old and his height is 136 centimeters.

A ten-year-old child should be 136cm tall, and the height cannot be expressed in square centimeters because it is an indication of area. Square meters and square decimeters are not right. It should be 136 cm.

The units of length are centimeters, decimeters, and meters. Whereas, the unit of area is square centimeter, square decimeter, square meter. Therefore, Xiao Ming's height is more appropriate to be represented by 136 cm.

Neither, the unit of height is the unit of length, which is 136 centimeters.

Instead of a unit of area (square centimeter, square decimeter, or square meter).

Each of your alternative answers is correct, and the height should be 136 centimeters.

No, there is no square of height, the square is a unit of area.