Which merit is better to be good at analysis and good at thinking?

Good at thinking, hands-on.

Is mildness also a shining point? Pros of the sparkle point?

Right. However, the advantages are good and good at the aspects, and the shining point belongs to the advantage, but it is not the same as the shining point, which only refers to the advantages that are different and others do not have.

Why introverts are better at analyzing.

Introverts hold everything in their hearts and don't say it, don't communicate with others often, are more careful themselves, can find more flaws, and have a lot of their own thoughts will be generated at this time.

Excuse me, it's better to ask that one.

You'll be better at what you're best at.

There are so many benefits to deep thinking, so what is deep thinking.

Deep thinking is a special way of thinking that helps us see through the surface of things and get to the core. This is a very important ability, almost all successful people can succeed, a large part of the reason is due to the ability to think deeply, for example, a good director is because he found the essence of the movie through deep thinking, a famous writer grasps the core of the article through deep thinking, and an outstanding entrepreneur also discovers new business opportunities through deep thinking. There is a great need for people who can think deeply.

There are four aspects:1multi-dimensional thinking; 2. Concrete thinking; 3.

Think about why; 4.Think about the consequences.

I think it's better to be good at analyzing these two advantages than to compare, because what we encounter in our daily life is often some specific things, and we can only do it if we don't see it and think about it well.

Good at analysis and good at thinking are similar, but in comparison, I think it is better to be good at analysis, because a thorough analysis will be conducive to decision-making.

Which merit is better to be good at analysis and good at thinking? It's better to be good at thinking. If people are good at thinking, they will do everything well.

I think these two are actually connected, when you are analyzing, you are naturally thinking, and when you are thinking, you are naturally analyzing.

Hello, based on your description, I think it's a little better to be good at analysis for the following reasons:

Being good at analysis can grasp the essence of things. After all, in today's society, a person's ability is indeed relatively limited, as long as you can analyze things and problems, then after a long time, you can naturally grasp the essence of some things, grasp the essence of things, then you can encounter the opportunity of some things, with the opportunity to soar is just a matter of time.

Corresponding smart though also very good, but we often only say that children are "smart", and generally do not say that adults are smart, and smart often has the situation that smart is mistaken by smart, so simple intelligence can only be strong for a while, not forever; There is also the fact that most people's cleverness is just a kind of small cleverness, in an old saying, it is "forgetting righteousness when seeing small profits, and sparing oneself when doing big things", this so-called cleverness does not have any great effect.

Sum up the above, so I think it is more important to be smart than to be good at analyzing, after all, you are smart and smart to the best of the best, so you must train children to be good at analyzing problems from an early age, of course, if a person is both smart and good at analyzing problems, then it is better.

First of all, we can't look at the problem one-sidedly, things are not good or bad, gold is not worth anything if it is placed in the wrong place, and garbage can become gold if it is placed in the right place. Good at analysis and cleverness, it depends on where it is used.

A person who is good at analysis, resourceful and decisive, can still be a second-in-command, a staff officer, an assistant, or a planner, and can give full play to his expertise. However, if such a person is allowed to be the boss directly, then he will suffer from gains and losses, and he will not be able to make a decision, because no plan can be perfect, there is his difficulty, and he has his advantages and disadvantages. We often talk about thinking before we act.

Some people don't know how to think at all. And some people just think too much, and in the end they are timid, they can't do anything, they can't do anything.

As for cleverness, there are two kinds of cleverness: small cleverness and great wisdom. There are many people who have very flexible minds and high IQs, but they often play tricks and play clever, and they may be able to profit for a while, but such people do not have a big picture, are short-sighted, and will not succeed in the end. And the great wisdom is different, these two are completely different, the great wisdom of people are also very smart, they know how to behave in the world, there is a big pattern, the general direction is right, in the end, this kind of talent is the real winner in life.

People who are good at analysis tend to be smart, and smart people are often good at analysis as well, which is two sides of the same thing, and there is no comparison.

Being smart is more important, being smart is to be able to see the essence of things, and the meaning of rational application of the essence, and analysis is just rigid data.

I think smart people are good at analysis, and I think it's good to have both.

It is better to be good at analysis than to be smart, because the former is long-lasting, and the latter is not.

.I think it is more advantageous and better to be good at analyzing the villagers, because it is not only a smart performance, but more importantly, it can be used in some places where it is needed.

I think each of them has its own advantages, that is, I can't say which one is better, because in different situations, your two things are different, and if you are good at analysis, you must also include smart and clever words, and I think it must also include, and you are good at analyzing that the two are interrelated.

I think it's better to be good at analysis. Because if you are good at analyzing, you will be calmer, and you will judge a thing if you think enough, but being smart is different, there is a saying that being smart is mistaken by being smart, so being smart does not mean being really smart.

Hello, I'm glad to answer this question for you, so I personally think that if you have these two situations, this is not a conflict, there is no conflict at all, such a person, smart person, he must also be a natural birth analysis, right? There's no doubt about it, so there's no conflict between him!

I think it's better to be good at analyzing this advantage. After all, a person who is good at analysis is actually very smart.

I think it's definitely better to be good at analysis, because when you understand these analyses, he will have more ways to solve problems than smart people.

It is important to be good at analysis, because only by analyzing thoroughly can we do things better.

Analysis, in itself, is a kind of thinking.

So, the two are actually the same ......All pluses!

Of course, there are many modes ...... thinkingAnalysis is one of the more rational and methodical modes of thinking, ......This ability is very helpful for solving complex problems.

People who are good at analysis are suitable for doing some analytical work, and they should also consider their own interests, it is recommended that you can choose: energy, communications, and finance.

These three industries are relatively promising, and they are needed by the public, and consumer loyalty is relatively high. Their market prospects are also good, and more importantly, these three industries can provide more power to the society, and they also need talents with analytical skills to engage in related work in this industry.

A person who knows how to analyze has to have many people working for you, many ways to earn money for you, and many places to make money for you. Use others to earn money for you, liberate yourself, and have time to learn how to make money quickly and prudently. Will use the power of capital. Will use the power of connections.

Will use the power of leverage: for example, borrowing the power of others, borrowing financial leverage, so that their limited resources can exert unlimited power.

Wisdom is a survival ability, and wisdom is a survival state.

There are not many smart people in the world, it is estimated that there is one in ten, and the wise people are even rarer, and it is estimated that there is no one in a hundred.

In real life, it is the smart people who are not willing to suffer, and those who are willing to "suffer."'is a wise man.

Smart people can seize opportunities and know when to make a move; And the wise know when to let go. Therefore, it is the wise who can pick it up, and the wise man who can put it down.

Wisdom gains a lot of knowledge, and wisdom makes people more literate. Conversely, the more knowledge a person has, the wiser he is, and the more culture, the wiser he is.

Wisdom depends on the ears and eyes, and the so-called ears are deaf and clear; And wisdom depends on the heart, and the so-called wisdom is born from the heart.

Smart people like to win everywhere and be superhuman; The wise, on the other hand, like to show weakness more and not show it. Because he knows that showing weakness is not only a kind of wisdom, but also a kind of strength. A wise person is often the kind of person who does things to enter the world with the mentality of being born. ”

This passage is picked up, because it is quite clear, I will not repeat it. And then a few of my observations. The origin is to have dinner with a friend, and I can feel that I am not particularly smart, but I am very wise in my words, and I am quite moved when I hear some things.

I think it's good to guess and analyze the long spike grinding base, after all, many things in the workplace have to be slowly understood and figured out, and wisdom is good, but I am afraid that the smart anti-swim core will be smart and mistaken.

Both are good, the combination of the two advantages is a very calm person, such a person always wants to keep a distance from the people and things around him, and will not let emotions control him. A lot of times, you're going to be a bystander before you get involved.

In addition, you also need to have enough personal space and a high degree of privacy, otherwise you will feel very anxious and uneasy! You also have the opportunity to become an expert, such as a computer whiz, cartoonist, fashion designer, etc., because you have a great love for knowledge.

Analysis, in itself, is a kind of thinking......

It would be a mistake to separate analysis from thinking.

The questioner should be trying to express the meaning of which is better, whether to be good at inductive analysis or good at theoretical thinking......If so, then, actually, both are very good.

Moreover, for the wise, theoretical thinking and inductive analysis are both ways of thinking that must be mastered.

Be sure to introduce yourself to your strengths and direct the question in the direction of your strengths. This will make a good impression on the employer. Instead of trying to prove what I am, think about what the employer wants me to be.

Consider the purpose of the company's recruitment, whether they are suitable or not. Skills and expertise are specific descriptions that require a comprehensive, detailed and focused presentation of their core competencies, such as skills and expertise, to the HR department.

It's all advantages, and it's good if you have them.

Being good at thinking and being good at analyzing are both advantages, and when I say which one is better, I think it's better to be good at analysis. But the two must be combined. Analyze clearly, think about the key points, and how to proceed, so as to be perfect.

Special note: There is no such thing as being good at talking about long things in modern Chinese, but it is often used by students, and "good at" should be used. The following is a comparison of the usage of "good at" and "good at".

Similarities: They all have the meaning of having a specialty in some area. That is, they are familiar with a certain aspect and can use it freely.

Both are used in front of verbs or verbal phrases.

Differences: Good means to have a certain specialty, which means that you are particularly proficient in a certain specialty.

For example: aGood at messy cooking.

b.I consulted with a comrade who was good at danqing and begged her to paint. Camellia Fu".

c.Good at public speaking.

Being good at it means being good at something, that is, having a specialty in a certain area, and not being particularly proficient, and the degree is much worse than being "good at".

For example: aHe is good at holding the racket horizontally with his left hand.

b.Xiao Wang is good at dealing with children.