I have a Nikon 50 1 8D prime head in my hand, and I want to buy a Nikon D3100 camera, can I use it?

Yes, but the D3100 is not a full-frame camera, with a 50 lens, the focal length is not 50 mm, but equivalent to 75 mm.

With lenses, you need to look at the actual situation, depending on whether you are mainly shooting landscapes or portraits, as well as the type of macro.

It can be used, but there are 2 problems, the first: 50 is a full lens, and the actual focal length on the D3100 body is 75mm, which is a bit difficult to mix indoors. Second:

The 50 is a D-head and requires a fuselage motor to drive, while the D3100 does not have a fuselage motor and can only be manual.

It is recommended to use 50 full heads) or 35 half-width heads on the D3100).

Totally usable.

This headset is almost 3100, and D90 is also available.

Of course, it's better to be D3X, but it's not necessary to buy a 60,000 yuan camera for a 600 yuan head.

It can be used completely, but the ASP machine is equivalent to a 75mm focal end, and it can't be shaken off at all indoors, and it's basically a big head sticker.

Something that costs a few hundred dollars can be completely ignored If you really want to show it casually, it's better to sell this and buy a card machine.

Your question is like if you have picked up a stool on the ground and want to buy a house and put it in.

D3100 is used for the D head, which cannot autofocus and metering. Buy 35 now.

Actually, I think it's better to buy it, like I bought a d90. More and more regrets. I knew to invest a little more. That's good.

The answer is undoubtedly that the D3100 + 18 55 lens shoots well, and not just better.

You are the one who has been fooled by the merchant with the pixel level to succeed. You know, even if the DSLR pixel is 6 million, it is definitely clearer and more delicate than the card with more than 10 million.

To put it simply, the image is created by the scene passing through the lens to the image sensor (CMOS) in the camera, which is the key to determining the effect. (DSLR and DC are more talking).

The CMOS behind the ordinary card camera (DC) is as small as a fingernail, and the SLR, no matter how small, is the standard size of the non-full set (X, which is not many times larger than the CMOS of the DC.

Here's the key:

It's all 10 million pixels, like 10 million dots, you can imagine for yourself, these 10 million dots, is it easier to draw on a business card or more calmly on A4 paper?

That's why the difference between the 10 million pixels claimed by a small digital camera and the 10 million pixels of a DSLR is so big.

Because when 10 million dots are drawn on the little fingernails, they crowd each other, and the image is blurry.

So no matter how good a card camera is, it can't compare to a DSLR.

A DSLR is a SLR professional machine, and a card machine is a home machine. At first glance, the classifications are different. The camera is not a pixel high, and the light is just bigger. If so, the prime is not very bad.

In terms of imaging, the DSLR is stronger than the card.

Compared to wide-angle cards, the telephoto card has better wide-angle imaging. The larger the focal length, the worse the imaging. Generally, a good SLR lens is a zoom within three times.

If you want a high pixel zoom and a large zoom, you can choose a telephoto camera instead of a DSLR. If you get a general lens for a DSLR, you can also buy a telephoto camera.

DSLR camera is good. It has to do with CCD.