Which should you choose, Panasonic FX07 or Canon IXUS850?

Updated on number 2024-08-07
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    I bought the Panasonic FX07, which is very suitable for home use, and it feels pretty good, hehe

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    Although the aspect has been improved, noise is not well controlled.

    850 is better.

    It's a cost-effective machine.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Compared to these two, the 850 is a little better. I considered both, but I chose 60 in the end.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Not far off. All stools are automatic, anti-shake, and wide-angle.

    If you like that, buy it.

    Compared with 850, it can be a little better, and it is also a little more expensive. Jujube returns.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The image quality of the 850 is much better than that of the Panasonic.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    850..Because Panasonic endorses Fan Bingbing, I hate it the most

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Ricoh R5 Composite Index:

    **:2400~2700

    Canon ixus850

    Composite Index: **: 2600 3000

    Panasonic FX07

    Composite Index: **: 2300 2900

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Ricoh, you don't have to think about it, it's really rubbish, and it's not cost-effective, as for Canon and Panasonic 07, these two are really difficult to choose, **, the functions are almost the same, and the origin is also original in Japan. I hesitated on these two years ago, and finally chose the Panasonic FX01, I recommend the imaging or Canon is good, Panasonic is good for cost performance. Several of my friends have bought the Canon ixus850, the imaging quality is better than that of Panasonic, the FX01 and 07 imaging are the same, and there are more explosions in night scenes.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    I just bought FX07GK (GK is the licensed logo).After coming back, my colleagues were more recognized.

    The goods (acquaintances) I took in Guangzhou on the 24th ** were 2180 yuan.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If you like whichever you want, the function is not too bad Besides, the high-end functions may not be able to be used.

    So it depends on personal preference for hunger.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Canon ixus 70 advantages:

    1.The appearance is fashionable and beautiful;

    2.Face priority focus system;

    3.Support ISO80-1600;

    4.The thickness of the fuselage is only;

    5.Scratch-resistant and anti-reflective LCD;

    iii. Image Processor;

    Cons 1Lack of stabilization;

    2.The fuselage shape is not popular enough;

    3.Poor detail;

    4.**The date display is lighter in color;

    Panasonic FX07 advantages.

    millimeter wide angle; inch, 200,000 pixel LCD screen has a good effect;

    3.Support ISO3200 high sensitivity;

    Disadvantages: The body generates a lot of heat, and the anti-dispersion ability of the lens needs to be improved.

    Overall, the Canon Ixus 70 is good!

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    FX07 bar, with stabilization and wide angle.

    The A480 has neither.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In a general sense, household use is to show that this thing should be "simple, convenient and easy to use", then the 710 with rich manual adjustment functions is inconsistent with this purpose, no matter from convenience, volume and other aspects, FX07 is superior.

    If you only think about daily family shooting, and don't have much interest in photography, you can definitely choose FX07.

  14. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    A710 is it, his value for money is already very good.

    And there is also optical image stabilization, rich manual functions, and enough to be used for practice, not to mention home use.

    In fact, as long as it's easy to use, plus I like it, I'm more hesitant than more.

  15. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    I recommend FX07, in addition to optical image stabilization, it also supports a wide angle of 28mm, and the practicality is also very high, and now** has dropped to about 2000.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Panasonic FX07 is better, with high technical content: Leica lens optical image stabilization high ISO

Related questions
19 answers2024-08-07

It's useless to say so much, let's buy a camera for practical and durable, my brother just bought an FX55, I bought an FX100, I used to use the FX9, 6 million pixels, just changed to 100, these two machines from my point of view, I prefer the FX100 >>>More

18 answers2024-08-07

I just bought Sony T700 two days ago,Very good,Panasonic doesn't understand,But I don't think Sony's appearance has to say,This touch screen is also very comfortable,Unlike T77It's soft,And built-in4G memory,Storage**More than 2000 no problem,Wide-angle zoom,Smiley shutter or something is very easy to use,The color of the light is also very positive,Very bright。 There are also many scene settings, and there is no blur in the scenery in the car. What's more amusing is its graffiti function. >>>More

24 answers2024-08-07

Landlord, I suggest you buy a Canon or a Nikon, I think their cameras are better than Sony's! You recommend several mainstream ones: if you are a photography enthusiast, buy the Nikon P5100 It is a professional camera very cost-effective and fun but it costs 2200! >>>More

17 answers2024-08-07

8 million pixels wash 8-10 inches (diagonal length) ** can be seen, no matter how big it is, it is more intolerable. This is not calculated based on numerical values, but on personal experience. The theoretical value of the calculated size is intolerable for users with certain image quality requirements. >>>More

7 answers2024-08-07

The most impressive parameters:

LX3: 24mm wide-angle 2x optical zoom (remember correctly), Leica lens with large aperture. >>>More