What are the thinking of the idea of reviewing the topic, and the eight methods of the idea of the q

The eight methods of reviewing the topic are as follows:

1. Refining the central method.

2. Grasp the key syntax.

3. Retrospective causal method.

4. The law of things and people.

5. Analytical relationship method.

6. Clarify the law of praise and disparagement.

7. Multi-directional radiation method.

8. Horizontal reverse method.

Importance of the review topic:

1. Accurate questions are the key to answering good questions.

In the face of many questions and materials, whether the candidate can ask what to answer depends on whether the candidate knows what the examiner needs, that is, whether he can approve the question.

The "problem" is to "summarize the characteristics of crowdfunding", so if we can accurately understand the meaning of "characteristics" here means that people or things are unique inside and outside, and "crowdfunding" is an entrepreneurial model, then this question must be easy to find the main point. However, if the above two points are not accurately understood, it is easy to deviate and answer the characteristics or characteristics of entrepreneurs.

2. Reviewing all questions is the guarantee for answering good questions.

Tell us to look at things to a comprehensive analysis, can not be one-sided, the same is true of the essay exam, the number of different questions is different, some only 1 question, some have 2 questions or even 3 questions, which requires us to strengthen the examination of questions, find all the questions, and do "all the questions must be answered".

There are thousands of arguments, and you can't run away from the question. As long as we calm down, read the questions carefully, strengthen the examination of the questions and requirements, and then supplement them with diligent practice, we will definitely be able to clarify the needs of the examiner, clarify the ideas of answering the questions, and go ashore as a "public".

1. The return of this year's college entrance examination material composition is quite unexpected, and it is likely to make some candidates flustered and at a loss. However, as long as you calm down and examine it carefully, you will find that the content of the comics provided is clear, and the difficulty of reviewing the idea of the topic is not high.

2. Seeking accuracy: The high-level essay questions in the first volume of this year's new curriculum standard are closely related to social life, carrying the concept of the new curriculum standard: "The future society requires people to be sharp-minded, full of exploration spirit and innovation ability, and have a deeper thinking and understanding of nature, society and life". This year's essay questions guide students to pay attention to the problems of homeschool's education for children, and think about how to deal with students' score hunger, progress and regression.

3. The cartoon is undoubtedly a utilitarian behavior in education, scolding if it regresses, and praising it if it progresses. Such an approach is divorced from the reality of the students themselves, and is blind and not unwise. The correct approach is undoubtedly to educate children to proceed from the child's own reality, to be strict and not harsh, and to appreciate and encourage without being overly indulgent.

4. Free expression: The new curriculum standard encourages high school students to "strive for individualized and creative expression, and write independently according to their personal strengths and interests". This year's essay questions are not difficult, and the style is not limited.

Candidates can express themselves creatively according to their own personality and life accumulation, and can write speeches, narratives, letters, speeches, debates, etc. However, no matter what genre is chosen, once chosen, it is necessary to follow the rules of this style of writing, highlight the characteristics of the style, and do not write the "four dislikes" of the style because the style is not limited. Furthermore, no matter what style of writing you choose, you must pay attention to the integrity of the structure, the sincerity of the feelings, the accuracy of the materials, and the fluency of the language.

1. Examination of questions: It is the process of in-depth thinking and repeated scrutiny of the topic of the composition and post-examination examination in order to understand its meaning, clarify the specific requirements of writing, establish the center of writing, determine the scope and focus of writing, determine the angle of writing and the tone of emotional expression, and clarify the way and method of writing.

2. Idea: It can express the two meanings of "make up your mind" and "propositional meaning" and use it in different contexts. In literary and artistic works, intention occupies a very important weight.

Whether a work can become a masterpiece is often determined by the idea. Intention is the meaning established by a work.

The idea includes the ideological content of the whole text, the author's conception and writing intention and motivation, etc., and the connotation of the concept is much broader than the theme. Ideas come before writing.

Extended Information: Requirements for the Intention of the Question:

1. The intention of the examination should be correct and clear. Correctness is the basic requirement of intention. Being correct means that the established subject reflects the essence and laws of nature, reflects the essence and mainstream of life, and conforms to the laws of development of nature and society.

The so-called distinctiveness refers to the fact that the established theme can clearly express what to love and what to hate; What is for and what is against.

2. The intention of the examination should be concentrated and simple. The theme is the general outline of the whole article, and it must be simple and clear.

3. The idea of the examination should be profound and novel. The so-called profundity refers to the fact that the established body can reflect the essence of life and the internal laws, and can reveal the profound ideological meaning contained in things. Novelty means that the established theme is the author's new understanding and new feelings, which can give people new enlightenment.

4. The intention of reviewing the topic should be positive. The so-called positivity makes it impossible to have any unhealthy factors, conform to the theme of the article, and follow the center of the article.

1. Examination of topics: It is a process of in-depth thinking and repeated scrutiny of the topic of the composition in order to understand its meaning, clarify the specific requirements of writing, establish the center of writing, determine the scope and focus of writing, determine the angle of writing and the tone of emotional expression, and clarify the way and method of writing.

First, the main points of analysis:

1.Scores, smiley faces, and palm prints on comics.

2.Topic requirements: Combine the content and semantics of the material.

2. Interpretation of comic content.

Judging from the cartoon, the whole reflects the treatment (or inner feelings) of students at two different levels of learning when they get different learning scores.

3. Examine the meaning.

1.It's a matter of facts.

According to the student's thinking angle, this is the student's individual or parent's request for the student. According to the level of the individual, set standards for themselves or children. It reflects a learning and teaching philosophy that is individualized and individualized.

2.Stretch your mind.

From the students' test scores, they can be associated with real-life cases. Those who are excellent have high requirements for themselves and hope to be perfect; Those who pass do not have high requirements for themselves, but still hope to achieve their goals. The lesson for us is that whether you can dominate in a certain industry or not, you need to have your own goals, clarify your own level, and strive to achieve your goals.

Fourth, the concept of the angle.

1.It's a matter of facts.

Starting from the student's learning career, talk about things, write your attitude towards yourself in life and learning, and finally clarify the main purpose of the article: no matter what your ability is, achieve your own goals, and make continuous progress, you are excellent. Treat others, don't measure by your own standards, you need to measure by the actual ability of others.

2.Extended writing.

1.Write about the attitude towards people and things, and make different requirements according to the individual's ability.

2.Write about your own requirements, make reasonable plans according to your own abilities, and look forward to the future.

5. Writing taboos.

1.The pressure of learning is heavy, and parents are demanding.

2.Comparison of two different levels of students and different levels of life.

6. Essay question comments.

The new curriculum standard essay has always been the vane of the national essay examination, which is based on actual life cases, close to students' lives, and examines students' critical thinking ability.

This year's new standard essay is somewhat similar to the comic problem in the basic Chinese expression questions that appeared in previous years, which is quite beneficial to students in Guangdong.

In view of the real life, the pressure of students to learn is increasing, and the requirements of parents and individuals are also increasing, and the examination of such essay questions is nothing more than to warn parents and students that they can continue to make progress according to their own level and according to their own ability to guess God, and continue to study and work hard, is an excellent person and a successful person. appeared in the first session of the college entrance examination, which also reflects the proposer's love for candidates and attaches importance to the guidance of candidates' mentality.

Of course, although the composition is relatively simple, it is also easy to have the problem of "too obvious level contrast", that is, the deviation caused by the emphasis on differences in test scores in the assignment.