If the factory is compensated for medical expenses caused by injuries caused by legitimate defense i

You are because you seriously violated the company's rules and regulations, made mistakes, and were terminated by the factory, and there is no compensation

An argument with a security guard and a fight between the two parties, resulting in injuries to one party, is a public order case. The police can punish you in accordance with the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, but if the perpetrator and the victim reach a compensation agreement, they can be exempted from public security punishment.

The compensation you give to the security guard is in accordance with the provisions of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, which is borne by you personally, and the unit has no obligation to bear it for you, so it cannot compensate you!

As for the fact that you were dismissed by the unit, I think that the dispute between you and the security guard did not occur when the security guard was performing his duties, and if so, the security guard was performing his legitimate duties, and you violated the rules and regulations of the unit!

According to the Labor Law and the Labor Contract Law, when an employee violates the rules and regulations of the employer, the employer can terminate the labor contract without giving economic compensation!

Mine may not be as you would like. Think about it, there is no way to escape the consequences of a momentary impulse.

If you have a conflict with a security guard in the performance of your job duties, you can be considered a work-related injury if you yourself are injured. Because you were not injured and the other party was injured, your company should be held responsible for your professional conduct. That is, of course, if you are performing your job duties.

Otherwise, you will not be compensated, and you will most likely be fired for violating the company's rules, and you will not be compensated.

It depends on the situation, there is no need to compensate for legitimate defense, but there is responsibility for excessive defense.

Article 20 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "Any act taken to stop an unlawful infringement in order to protect the State, the public interest, the person, property and other lawful rights of oneself or others from an ongoing unlawful infringement and causes damage to the wrongdoer shall be regarded as justified self-defense and shall not bear criminal responsibility." "Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limits and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived.

The key is to figure out whether it is legitimate defense, legitimate defense does not need to lose money, and excessive defense requires losing money.

According to the relevant laws and regulations, if the damage is caused by legitimate defense, it will not bear civil liability, and there is no need to compensate for medical expenses. If the justifiable defense exceeds the necessary limit and causes undue damage, it shall bear appropriate civil liability, so it shall be appropriately liable for compensation for medical expenses according to the actual situation.

The relevant laws and regulations are the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 128:Where harm is caused by legitimate defense, civil liability is not borne. Where legitimate defense exceeds the necessary limits and causes undue harm, appropriate civil liability shall be borne.