How should I prepare for the postgraduate examination in law?

Analysis is the most important thing, so to speak, you have memorized the analysis, studied it thoroughly, even if you don't use other information much, you can have a passable score. However, if you don't grasp the analysis well, it will be very difficult to get to 120 even if you do the question bank and supporting exercises 5 times. This, when you do the past papers, you will have a feeling.

The real questions are based on analysis, which is different from the question bank and supporting exercises, so try to put the question bank and supporting exercises in front of it, and don't be afraid of making mistakes, just help understand and expand the knowledge points, and the last time should be reserved for analysis and real questions. PS: The part of the sub-rules of the criminal law still needs to look at the guide, and the other parts only look at the analysis and legal provisions.

The exercises were written according to the chapters, which I was very comfortable using at the time. In the first round, I previewed and analyzed the corresponding content before each class, then listened to the lecture, and completed the objective questions (i.e., multiple-choice questions) corresponding to the supporting exercises as soon as possible after listening to the class. However, the quality of the subjective questions of the supporting exercises is average, especially the questions of the comprehensive course, so it is not recommended that you delve into the subjective questions of the supporting exercises.

In addition, some of the answers to the questions in the accompanying exercises are not accurate, such as the question "Does the violation of the object of the crime necessarily constitute the completion of the crime?" AD Master of Law gave me a comprehensive explanation of the objective questions of the supporting exercises, and the common controversial questions and inaccurate answers will be pointed out by the seniors in class, which avoids me wasting time by studying too much because the answers themselves are inaccurate.

The importance of past papers is the same as the analysis. It is recommended to do the past question at least three times, and the specific time can be mastered by yourself. It is best to review for a month, and then you can do the real questions from 3 years ago, you don't have to do it, you can just watch it, and understand the type of questions and the difficulty of the questions.

Then, you can continue to do the past questions for the next ten years. Past papers from the past three years are best saved for simulation after September. I applied for the AD Master of Law at that time, because the lecture notes of the AD Master of Law pasted all the past questions within five years in the corresponding places of analysis, so the students could do the real questions by the way in the process of reading the lecture notes.

After reviewing to a certain extent, you should do a set of past papers for the higher education version. The set of questions is a must-do, because first, it can make you feel like the exam, and second, you can familiarize yourself with the approximate question number position of each knowledge point. For example, for example, the third question of civil law generally involves the content of **, you don't need to consider the entrustment contract, but if you don't know the question number, you may hesitate to test which part of the knowledge point.

It's also a question of answering skills.

There are differences between the guidelines and some of the points of analysis, but the LLM exam is based on analysis, so it is not recommended to study the guidelines too much. The final subjective questions are all about memorization and analysis, and the familiarity with the analysis is directly proportional to the final LL.M. joint examination score, so it is recommended that you take analysis as a teaching material at the beginning, so as to fully familiarize yourself with the content of analysis. However, due to the poor readability of the analysis, it is not easy for beginners to understand, and the AD Master of Law explained the analysis in great detail at that time, and I would supplement the cases where I needed to explain them.

For the part of the history of the legal system, I would like to recommend another book, which is the collection of test points of the National People's Congress edition. Personally, I think the rest of the book is average, but the history of the legal system sums it up very well. There was an objective question on the history of the legal system before, which was not in the analysis, but it was mentioned in the collection of test points.

Although the knowledge points of this question are also in the guide, there is no need to read the guide in the legal history part, which is too time-consuming, and the test center collection itself is refined, so I think it is very suitable as a supplement to the analysis of the legal history part.

Postgraduate Law Applicants:1) Citizens of the People's Republic of China.

2) Support the leadership of the Communist Party of China, be of good moral character, and abide by discipline and law.

3) The physical health condition meets the physical examination requirements stipulated by the state and the enrollment unit.

Attention to the application for law graduate students:Candidates who have repeatedly applied for the state test and paid the fee multiple times only need to confirm a valid registration information, and repeated confirmation will be regarded as invalid registration. Candidates must submit all application materials and complete the payment procedures in accordance with the registration requirements.

Candidates should contact the tutor before applying for the exam, and obtain the consent of the tutor before applying for the exam. Carefully understand and strictly follow the application conditions and relevant policy requirements to choose to fill in the volunteers, accurately fill in the registration information and provide real materials as required.

1. Clear goals:The specific performance is to set short-, medium-, and long-term goals for yourself, and remind yourself at all times.

2. Perseverance:The achievement of any goal is the result of perseverance, and when you want to give up, tell yourself to persevere.

3. Combination of work and rest:Any persistence is a hard thing, and people's physical strength is also limited, in the process of insisting on learning, we should pay attention to the combination of work and rest, and take timely rest and entertainment.

4. Alternate learning and thinkingLearning knowledge is for application, but the actual situation is complex and changeable, and it is impossible to strictly follow the content of the book, so we should pay attention to thinking and integrate thinking into learning.

Tips for Case Study Questions:

1. Read carefully:

Before doing the question, you need to read the case carefully, pay attention to the details, clarify the relationship between the details and the case, and clarify the requirements and problems of the topic.

2. Find out the "knowledge points":

The case analysis is based on the facts of the case and the provisions of the law. Clarify the facts of the case and find the corresponding legal provisions, and explain the relevant legal provisions. Then combine the facts of the case with the legal provisions.

3. Clarify the answering ideas:

After identifying the knowledge points related to the case analysis questions, the ideas should be further organized. When answering questions, it is necessary to consider the concepts, regulations, or judicial interpretations involved in each case, and clearly connect and recall these concepts, regulations, or judicial interpretations. The language should be concise and well-founded, and it is necessary to make marginal and subjective assumptions and simply pile up words.

The LL.M. Guide, the full name of the National LLM Professional Degree Graduate Entrance Examination Guide, covers all five courses of the LLM Professional Course Examination. Examination analysis, the full name of the National Master's Degree Entrance Examination Examination for Master of Laws, is used for the final sprint and to check and fill in the gaps. Practice books, such as "Juris Master Joint Examination Syllabus Supporting Exercises", etc.

Past past papers. 2. Suggestions for reviewing professional courses:

It is not easy to get a high score in English, and it is difficult to distance yourself from other candidates, and the general candidates in politics are similar, showing a trend of low scores and high scores at both ends and large scores in the middle, while professional courses are different, two professional courses account for 300 points, and the high score can get about 270, and the low score may be 160, which can open up a gap of 100 points.

Review of professional courses: first look at the substantive law, that is, civil law and criminal law, and then look at the constitution, legal history, and jurisprudence. The professional course mainly looks at the guide and the analysis of the exam.

3. Professional course review plan:

In the information preparation stage, understand the relevant knowledge of the Master of Laws; 1st Round Foundation Stage; the second round of intensification; The third round of reinforcement and summary stage.