Alibaba has been placed under investigation, what is the reason for the investigation?

Because of the commercial monopoly, Alibaba has made the community ** like this, and Ali has been investigated for suspected monopoly, which is a benchmark for Internet anti-monopoly.

Because of the commercial monopoly, Alibaba has made the community ** like this. It has affected the business and economy of small businesses.

The State Administration for Market Regulation filed a case for investigation into suspected monopolistic behaviors such as the implementation of "one out of two" against Alibaba Group Holdings in accordance with the law. Strengthen anti-monopoly supervision

According to the official, it is an anti-monopoly investigation in accordance with the law, and Alibaba Group is suspected of monopolizing the market in many industries, and it is normal for the state to conduct an investigation.

Alibaba's investigation can be said to have become a household name recently, what impact will this matter have on Alibaba? The most direct impact is the stock price, which lost 600 billion all of a sudden, what is this concept, many people dare not think, and I will talk about my personal thoughts and views on this issue for reference only.

Alibaba was placed under investigation

Alibaba is now under investigation because of anti-monopoly issues, and then Alibaba's stock price fell to a market value of $600 billion in an instant, so Alibaba's investigation can be said to have a very direct impact on Alibaba, but does Alibaba have a monopoly problem? This is for sure, when a company becomes bigger, it will definitely maintain its own territory, so there will definitely be a monopoly problem, otherwise with the rise of Tencent, Jingdong, Pinduoduo and other e-commerce, Alibaba has long been encroached.

Operations on Alibaba

Is there any impact on Alibaba's operations? In fact, there is no impact, because Alibaba is still Alibaba, **or**, Alipay or Alipay, or will operate according to the normal process, at most it is a change in the way of communication with merchants, and this problem will not affect Alibaba's operation, and Alibaba's loss of 6000 market value will not affect Alibaba's operation.

Summary of the problem

Alibaba's problems exist in many enterprises, when a company becomes bigger and stronger, after all, it will prevent others from encroaching on their territory, so protecting their territory has become the top priority, but Alibaba's investigation has indeed affected Alibaba's market value, which also has some problems, so Alibaba's investigation will not affect Alibaba's operations, but there is a warning to Alibaba, after all, enterprise competition needs to be carried out under the principle of fairness and justice, so that enterprises can develop normally and reasonably。 The above are my personal views and thoughts, for reference and discussion only.

This is actually a big blow to Alibaba's development, which means that Alibaba should be cautious in future planning, and then no business problems can occur.

It will make Alibaba's ** down. It may cause damage to the company's operations and development plans in the later stage. It is not conducive to the completion of the company's later plans. It will affect Alibaba's reputation among the public.

Relatively speaking, the operational impact is not large, but if a problem is found, it will have a great impact on the overall future development direction.

I think that being investigated shows that there is a problem in the operation of the whole company, but there are no actual problems at present, and it should not cause any major problems.

In the course of the current investigation, there will be no impact on Alibaba's operations. If anything is investigated, it will affect Alibaba's operations and market value.

The State Administration for Market Regulation filed a case for investigation into the implementation of "one of two choices" and other suspected monopolistic behaviors by Alibaba Group Holding **** in accordance with the law. The central bank also issued a statement saying that the People's Bank of China, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange interviewed Ant Group, urging and guiding Ant Group to implement the requirements of financial supervision, fair competition and protection of the legitimate rights and interests of consumers in accordance with the principles of marketization and rule of law, and standardize the operation and development of financial business. Ant Group immediately responded in the announcement:

Ant Group has received an interview notice from the regulatory authorities, and we will carefully study and strictly comply with the requirements of the regulatory authorities, and do a good job in implementing the relevant work to the letter.

In this regard, the people** issued a document saying that strengthening anti-monopoly supervision is for better development, and said that "anti-monopoly has become an urgent issue related to the overall situation". People's ** said: According to the report, the State Administration for Market Regulation, on the basis of preliminary verification and research, filed a case for investigation into the suspected monopolistic behavior of Alibaba Group Holdings, such as "choosing one of two".

This is an important measure for China to strengthen anti-monopoly supervision in the Internet field, which is conducive to standardizing the industry order and promoting the long-term and healthy development of the platform economy. The online economy must be innovated and developed in accordance with laws and regulations, and if it exceeds the restrictions of laws and regulations, and allows market monopoly, disorderly expansion, and brutal growth, it will eventually make the entire industry unable to achieve healthy and sustainable development. The purpose of this investigation by the regulatory authorities on Internet companies suspected of monopolistic behavior in accordance with laws and regulations is to better regulate and develop the online economy, so that the Internet industry can move forward better on the track of the rule of law.

Jing Xiandong, chairman of Ant Group, said at the China Internet Finance Forum that under the guidance of regulators, Ant has made every effort to deal with the aftermath of the suspension of listing, conscientiously conducted a comprehensive self-examination against the new requirements of the regulatory authorities, and actively cooperated with the regulators to further implement the regulatory requirements. He said that he is deeply aware that maintaining financial security and preventing financial risks is the premise of all innovation and development in the financial field, and that Ant serves many consumers and small and micro enterprises. He also said that in the next five years, Ant will continue to work with financial institutions to improve efficiency through technological innovation and further reduce the cost of financial services, so as to achieve both universal and more universal benefits.

At the same time, we will continue to increase investment in scientific and technological innovation, especially focusing on R&D and application in core areas, and increasing the comprehensive opening up of technology, so as to help the digital transformation of financial institutions.

Mainly because Alibaba has anti-monopoly behaviors and seriously violates market rules, it will be investigated.

The State Administration for Market Regulation conducted an investigation into Alibaba Group Holdings' suspected monopolistic behaviors such as "choosing one of the two" in accordance with the law. ** The bank also issued an announcement stating that the People's Bank of China, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China ** Regulatory Commission and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange have conducted an exclusive interview with Ant Group to supervise and guide Ant Group in implementing financial supervision and fair competition. and protect consumers in accordance with the principles of marketization and the rule of law.

In accordance with the requirements of rights and interests, standardize the development of financial business. Ant Group immediately responded in the announcement: Ant Group received an interview notice from the regulator.

We will carefully study and strictly abide by the requirements of the regulatory authorities, and complete the implementation of relevant work without compromise.

Because Alibaba was reported as a suspected monopoly, it will be investigated.

Alibaba was investigated for suspected monopolistic behavior, and this matter should be viewed from a dialectical perspective.

First, any monopolistic behavior should be investigated. Ali's volume is so large, if it involves monopoly misconduct, it is a very normal thing for the relevant ** departments to intervene in the investigation.

Second, investigating monopolistic practices is not about bringing down Ali. It is not easy for Chinese enterprises to become bigger and stronger. Chinese law only prohibits monopolies, not companies from becoming bigger and stronger. Strong Chinese-funded enterprises are the internal driving force for China to go global.

It is a basic logic that enterprises create wealth, create jobs, and give back to society by organizing production. Successful entrepreneurs can also obtain wealth beyond ordinary people, which is also the basic logic of a market economy and a society governed by the rule of law. However, the premise of all this is that enterprises and successful entrepreneurs cannot use their huge wealth and market monopoly behavior to harm the interests of society as a whole.

The boundaries of the law are only aimed at cracking down on these behaviors that take advantage of monopolistic behaviors and harm social interests, and cannot be expanded.

Investigating monopolistic behavior is not about fighting local tyrants and dividing up land. I think it's wrong if social sentiment goes in this direction.

What is Monopoly:

The word monopoly originates from Mencius's "must seek monopoly and climb to it, and look left and right to make profits in the online market".

Originally, it referred to manipulation on the high ground of the market**, and later it generally referred to control and monopoly.

Since ancient times, China has called monopoly "Yong". In ancient China, salt, iron, and tea had long been a government-run monopoly, and because of the huge profits, once the country had a financial crisis, in order to make up for the lack of state use, it was inevitable to implement a ban system.

In a capitalist economy, monopoly refers to the manipulation and control of the production, sale and control of commodities in one or several sectors by a small number of large capitalist enterprises through mutual agreements or associations in order to obtain high profits.

Combined with the provisions of China's Anti-Monopoly Law, monopolistic behavior refers to the elimination or restriction of competition and the conduct that may eliminate or restrict competition. [1]

A monopoly industry is a situation in which there are only one or a very small number of manufacturers in the industry or market. The monopoly market refers to the market organization of only one or a very small number of manufacturers in the entire industry.

In the book of political economy, a small number of capitalist enterprises manipulate and control the production or circulation of commodities in one or several sectors by virtue of the huge amount of capital they control, sufficient scale of production and operation, and market share, through agreements, alliances, alliances, equity participation, etc., in order to obtain high profits.

Through this incident, it reflects that Alibaba already has monopolistic behavior, so it will be investigated by the state. I believe that Alibaba will make a change.

I think this thing is really happy, because every company should not monopolize, which is a blow to every industry.

It is a normal business case, no matter how big the company is, it must abide by the rules of the market and not exceed the boundaries of the law.

I think it's very good, to a certain extent, it is to regulate the development of their enterprises, so that they will open a case for investigation.

This investigation does not mean that the state's attitude towards the encouragement and support of the platform economy has changed, but it is precisely to better regulate and develop the platform economy, guide and promote its healthy development, in order to make greater contributions to the high quality of China's economy. It is believed that by strengthening anti-monopoly supervision, the obstacles that affect the healthy development of the platform economy can be removed, and the platform economy will also usher in a better development environment.

It should be said that it is of great significance, so that China's anti-monopoly law can be known to the world, and those profiteers will not take advantage of it.

This measure can strengthen our management in the Internet field, prevent private enterprises from taking the opportunity to monopolize the market, disrupt market order, promote the harmonious and normal development of the economy, and effectively maintain the stability of the domestic environment.

This initiative is of great significance, and it makes everyone deeply understand that the existing system is bigger than the sky, no matter who you are.

I think this initiative can allow many businesses in the market to self-examine, find out their own shortcomings, manage their own companies, and supervise each other, which is conducive to creating a better atmosphere in the market industry.

It is to help the market restore normal order, reform the regulations on Alibaba's unreasonable operation, and formulate regulations to protect farmers.

I think it is normal for Alibaba to be investigated, and there is no need to make a big fuss!

Strict regulation is a win-win situation Alibaba is actually not a big deal to be investigated, many companies will face such a problem, even international giants, such as Apple, Google, Intel or Amazon, etc., have experienced such a thing. Being investigated is nothing more than a manifestation of the regulator's increased supervision, which in itself is a win-win situation.

On the one hand, the regulatory authorities can regulate Alibaba's behavior and prevent the behavior of the oligopoly market, and at the same time, it can also make consumers more assured and worry-free, so Alibaba's investigation is not as bad as imagined, and the impact is not so great. Whether it is for Alibaba or consumers, it is actually a positive thing.

Alibaba's future Alibaba has indeed suffered a lot of difficulties this year, but for Alibaba, these things will not make Alibaba unable to continue to operate. Enterprises monopolizing the market can definitely make greater profits. However, the regulatory authorities will definitely not allow it, so even if Alibaba does violate the rules in the process of operation, the final result may only be to face relatively high penalties, and it will not lead to the collapse of Alibaba.

As one of the top Internet companies in China, the country also has high hopes for Alibaba, so it is impossible for the country to completely defeat Alibaba, in fact, there is still support for Alibaba. Therefore, Alibaba's investigation should be viewed rationally, Alibaba may indeed have some problems, but it is not a big problem. Moreover, Alibaba's problems may also exist in other companies, but Alibaba has become a "target" and is first investigated and concerned, so it is considered that this matter is very serious.

In fact, it doesn't have that much impact, so I look at it with a normal heart.