Does MediaTek Helio X20 support Android 7 0

I'm bullish on Samsung's new processor, the Mongoose 1, and Samsung has always been a dark horse. My conclusion is that the Exynos 8890> Qualcomm 820> MT6797> Kirin 950 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 scored 1732 points for single-core and 4970 points for multi-core. Kirin 950 single-core score 1909 points, multi-core score 6096 points, exynos 8890 points, single-core score of 2294 points, multi-core score of 6908 points, eyxnos7420 single-core score of 1486 points, multi-core score of 5284 points, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 single-core score of 1227 points, multi-core score of 4424 points.

7420 messed in, it should be Samsung "Mongoose" (mongoose) processor, exynos8890, four mongoose cores, four A53 to form eight cores. MT6797 The world's first 10-core mobile processor, with two cores + four cores + four cores, GPUARMMALI-T880MP4, with a frequency of 700MHz, claimed to be up to 40 performance improvement compared to MT6595PowerVRG6200, and MT6595's GPUpowerVRG6200MP2,700MHz,, GPU, X20 seems to have grabbed the first launch of the Mali-T800 series, MediaTek said that the GPU used in the X20 is Arm's "yet-to-be-released, high-end GPU similar to the T880", and here MediaTek has chosen a more conservative quad-core 700MHz setting, although MediaTek has not released too many details, but MediaTek still has a tradition of never using particularly high-end GPUs. The Snapdragon 820 quad-core Kryo architecture is based on the ARMv8 instruction set, supports 64-bit computing, and can support up to 3GHz clock speed (of course, this is a theoretical value).

According to leaked documents, the Snapdragon 820 will use two clusters of quad-core processors, with two cores clocked at the clock, and the other two cores clocked at the clock, which is up to 40% faster than the Adreno430's graphics processing and computing speed, while also reducing power consumption by 40%. A430, 500-600MHz, Kirin 950, is four Cortex-A53 + four Cortex-A72 cores, the highest frequency, GPU is Mali-T880MP6, 255Gflops, LTE baseband is upgraded to Cat10 level, supports 450Mbps network Exynos7420: CPU part, using four main frequency Cortex-A57 cores, Four main frequency Cortex-A53 cores form an octa-core asynchronous large and small core architecture; The GPU part is an octa-core Mali-T760MP8 with a frequency of 700MHz,

Not good! If you want to play games, don't choose MediaTek's processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and MediaTek Heliox20 comparison, see what performance you pay more attention to! 1. CPU performance, Qualcomm Snapdragon 652, which is positioned in the low-end and MediaTek Heliox20, has low performance.

2. Compared with the performance of the integrated GPU, Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and MediaTek Heliox20 have much higher performance, and it can even be said to be hanging. If there is a game requirement, it must be the former Qualcomm 625

If you use x20 for more tasks, floating-point arithmetic is very awesome; The game is still 655, and it has been optimized.

Your question is like asking if you can eat with wooden chopsticks and a golden bowl.

MediaTek has never forbidden mobile phone brands to upgrade the system, and for the most advanced processors, they also provide Android and even the drivers and bottom packages under the system, and recently joined the GMS Express program, which means that you can get the latest Android system in the shortest possible time.

If the landlord's mobile phone does not upgrade the system, it is the mobile phone brand that should be blamed for inaction and not MediaTek, if it is the mobile phone of the Qualcomm processor that does not upgrade the system, is Qualcomm to blame.

MT6797 and MT6797M, without suffix is the standard version, M stands for downclocked version, both of which are Helio X25 models are MT6797T

LeTV 2, there is nothing else to buy.

The craft is a hard injury, don't listen to MediaTek bragging.

The X20 is 20nm, and the two A72s get the main frequency. People's 16nm A72 full load power consumption has reached the left and right, this 20nm A72 full load power consumption should be close to 2W, that is to say, the two A72 are destined to be real men in a few seconds, and then the frequency will be reduced.

In addition, A53 is piled up 8, but it is good to run the score, most of the mainstream software can only support 4 cores in parallel, and there are not many software that can support 8 cores in parallel. In addition, the performance of a software in multi-core parallel is also lossy, a core runs a software, assuming that the performance is 100, this software assumes that it supports 4 cores in parallel, and the 4 cores together can only reach about 300, not 400

The 14nm process used for 820 has certain advantages in terms of power consumption ratio.

No, the performance is a lot worse.