Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 beats MediaTek Helio X10

Upstairs is wrong! The Snapdragon 650 uses a 28nm HPM process, consisting of two A72 cores and four A53 cores, with a single-threaded score of 1500 and an Antutu score of 78,000, while the X10 has a single-threaded score of only 900 and an Antutu score of 50,000. The Snapdragon 650 is far stronger than the X10 in terms of overall performance and GPU performance.

The CPU running score of 650 is close to 80,000, and the X10 is more than 50,000. The 650 features a new architecture and Arm's new caching technology. The performance is close to the 810.

GPUs are comparable to the two. The baseband 650 supports 4G on the whole network, and the X10 can only be mobile and connected, and the X10 has the problem of WiFi disconnection. In terms of performance, Qualcomm 810> Qualcomm 652> Qualcomm 650> Qualcomm 808> MediaTek X10> Qualcomm 801

Performance 650 complete abuse x10

Power consumption,Both are about the same,X10 is a little lower than 650,The gap is not very big。 The GPU is 2 times better than the X10, and it doesn't blow.

The Snapdragon 650 has 2 A72 cores, and the overall performance is definitely stronger than that of the 6795. Also, the 650 is not a shrinkage of the 808, and the performance cannot only look at the frequency. The architecture of the A72 is better than that of the A57 of the 808

Such a thing is actually recommended.,Just ask someone who knows that Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 has fully exploded MediaTek X10.,Anyone who asks knows it.,I won't complain.。

The MediaTek 7050 is equivalent to the Snapdragon 778g.

The Dimensity 7050 processor features an octa-core CPU architecture, including two Arm Cortex-A78 performance cores clocked at the clock, resulting in faster application response times and greater simplicity for game streamers. The Dimensity 7050 processor integrates an ARM Mali-G68 GPU, which can provide a smooth daily gaming experience, and excellent power efficiency extends the battery life of the end device.

The Dimensity 7050 supports an FHD+ resolution of 120Hz, and with MediaTek's variable refresh rate technology, device manufacturers can provide users with a smooth display and long battery life. So, the Dimensity 7050 is a low-to-mid-range processor, which is equivalent to the Snapdragon 778G processor.

Snapdragon 778g introduced

The Snapdragon 778G is a 5G mobile platform released by Qualcomm on May 18, 2021. The Snapdragon 778G uses 6nm process technology, and the Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset uses a Qualcomm Kryo 670 CPU with a sixth-generation AI engine with a Hexagon 770 processor with 12 TOPS performance.

The Snapdragon 778G is powered by the Qualcomm KRYO 670 CPU, which delivers a 40% performance boost while delivering excellent power efficiency, and its Adreno 642L GPU is claimed to be 40% faster than its predecessor. In terms of artificial intelligence, the Snapdragon 778G has a sixth-generation AI engine with a Hexagon 770 processor with 12 tops performance. To enhance the game, it is also equipped with the "Snapdragon Elite Gaming" feature.

MediaTek X20The advantage is that there are two A72 large cores with the main frequency, 650 large cores only, and X20 has four more A53 small cores, and the CPU performance version is, of course, X20 the lead.

But in terms of GPU, Snapdragon 650's Adreno510 has excellent power consumption and heating due to its high energy consumption ratio, which is better than 650, and the actual game is indeed inferior to 650, at least now from the point of view of game frames650 is superior, even if it is X25, the game can't fight 650, let alone X20.

Both support and LPDDR3 933MHz, and both support the 20nm process of 652 compared with the 28nm hpm of 652, so there is not much difference between the two in the process.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 processor is better.

It should be X20 will be better, 650 is dual-core A72 plus quad-core A53, X20 is dual-core A72 plus dual quad-core A53, X20 has four more small cores, and the performance should be better.

From two aspects, Qualcomm, as the world's No. 1 communications company, will still be the leader in strength and competitiveness in the future. CPU and baseband CPU, MediaTek high-end CPU is decent, GPU is still a weakness, MediaTek has never paid attention to GPU, compared with Qualcomm, it is simply pediatric, has been relying on the number of cores to improve performance, the latest X20 is known as the world's top ten cores, but it is still inferior to the technologically advanced Qualcomm and Huawei's R&D team's Snapdragon 820 and Kirin 950Baseband, needless to say, in the baseband chip, Qualcomm is even more amazing, accounting for nearly 7% of the market share, 66%, MediaTek, Spreadtrum are % respectively.

At this stage, MediaTek's main chips are all integrated MediaTek's baseband chips, which can support the domestic China Mobile and China Unicom networks, but there is always a little obstacle in the CDMA field. The MT6797 network baseband is integrated with the specification, while the 820 and 950 are both CAT 10. The signal has always been said to be poor, and the technical team is not strong, so hurry up and hire experts from the United States.

The x20 is good if you don't play games, and the Snapdragon 650 is good if you love to play big games.

MediaTek X20The advantage is that there are two A72 large cores with a main frequency, 650 large cores only, and X20 has four more A53 small cores, and the CPU performance is of course X20 is ahead.

But in terms of GPU, Snapdragon 650's Adreno510 has excellent power consumption and heating due to its high energy consumption ratio, which is better than 650, and the actual game is indeed inferior to 650, at least now from the point of view of game frames650 is superior, even if it is X25, the game can't fight 650, let alone X20.

Both support and LPDDR3 933MHz, both support and Volte.

The 20nm process of X20 is not much improved compared to the 28nm HPM of 652, so there is not much difference between the two in terms of process.

If you look at the parameters, of course, it is x20 good. 650 is 6 cores. But the result of the real experience is 650 good.

The experience of playing the game is good. The X20 is too hot, and many manufacturers limit the X20 frequency. So the experience is even more insufficient.

And there is also the problem of disconnection, wifi disconnection. It just can't be used when connected to wifi.

If it's a running score of x20, it's fine. When MediaTek is not running the score, it is difficult to have one core, and 9 cores are onlookers.

These are the unanimous views that many people have reached after actually experiencing them.

With the same A53 architecture, the higher the frequency, the faster the speed, so the X10 with higher frequency is faster.

Helio X10 Turbo (MT6795T), the world's first octa-core processor with a clock speed of up to , Arm Cortex-A53 architecture, GPU PowerVR G6200 MP2, 700MHz,.

616 processor: eight Cortex-A53 architecture cores, quad-core Arm Cortex A53+ and quad-core A53, integrated GPU part is A405, 550 MHz,

Of course the x10 is fast and he is a Qualcomm 801 comparator.

Compared to the Snapdragon 650 of the Redmi 3 and the P10 of the Oppo R9, the 650 is about twice as large as the P10.

Qualcomm renamed the Snapdragon 618 620 to the Snapdragon 652 650, and there is no change in hardware and performance, but the naming has been adjusted, and the reason is mainly to increase recognition, because of the hardware and sex.

The new Snapdragon 652 650 is close to the previous generation flagship Snapdragon 800 series, and in terms of functionality, it also includes almost all the features of the Snapdragon 800 series.

Qualcomm's positioning of the Snapdragon 652 650 chips is a high-end platform processor that provides the ultimate mobile entertainment, which is second only to the Snapdragon 820 in the Qualcomm product series, but the 652 650 is comparable to the Snapdragon 800 series in terms of function and performance, depending on the current mainstream flagship processor as a competitor, and even in many reports, the Snapdragon 652 is close to the previous generation flagship Snapdragon 810 in some performance.

First of all, the Snapdragon 652 650 uses an Arm Cortex

The 64-bit multi-core architecture of A72+A53 is made on a 28nm process, while the difference between the 652 650 is that one is 8 cores and one is 6 cores, and the others are exactly the same. Adreno

510 GPU with support for DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES

and support Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC), which means that the bandwidth used to transfer the same size of data is smaller, so the amount of computation is higher, and the details of the picture are more and more detailed.

The 650 is designed as a 6-core CPU and is a 64-bit dual-core Arm Cortex A72+ quad-core A53 part is an A510 with 550 MHz,.

Helio X10 (MT6795T), the world's first octa-core processor clocked at up to , Arm Cortex-A53 architecture, GPU PowerVR G6200 MP2, 700MHz,.

Let's summarize the detailed parameters first.

Helio X20, is a ten-core processor.

It is composed of quad-core low-frequency A53 + quad-core high-frequency A53+ dual-core A72, and the main frequency reaches the highest.

It is manufactured using 20nm process.

The GPU is Mali-T880MP4 with a frequency of up to 700MHz.

The Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core processor.

8 A53 are used, and the main frequency is the highest.

14nm process.

The GPU is Adreno 506

So obviously, the X20 has the blessing of A72, and in terms of performance, it kills the A53 of the Snapdragon 625 and the GPU performance of the X20 is twice that of the Adreno 506.

If you play games, the x20 will also perform better.

However, some mobile phones currently use X20, perhaps for the sake of power consumption and heating, the two A72 large cores are basically locked (i.e., locked cores, hibernating) and will not be automatically turned on under normal circumstances. Therefore, it can't give full play to the performance of X20, resulting in more people spraying it on the Internet, and the negative impact is greater. In fact, this processor is not very bad, and after the phone is unlocked, you can use some tools to turn on the full performance.

As for the Snapdragon 625, the main thing is power consumption and battery life, which is its advantage, and the power resistance, such as the Xiaomi MAX2 is a good example. The large battery plus 625 has an invincible battery life.

So the short board is that its performance is not too good, but there is no problem in daily life, it is enough. In addition, the GPU is also poor, and it is definitely inferior to the X20 or even the Snapdragon 65x 660 series when playing games.

Generally speaking, you only need to follow your needs, and if you love to play games, then x20 likes power resistance, then 625

Redmi note4x is MediaTek X20, it's been used for a year and a half, and it's hot and stuck in ten minutes in summer, and the power consumption has been very fast, and there was a 30% drop in electricity after 30 minutes of ordinary use.

Now it's not good for X20 optimization, the heat is big and the card is stuck, and all aspects are killed by 625 seconds. If you want to buy X20, you can only choose Meizu, only its optimized points.

The X20 is strong but unstable and generates a lot of heat. The 625 performance is average, but it is stable.

It must be that the X20 is better, the Snapdragon 625 is positioned in the low-end and mid-range is much worse than the Snapdragon 653, and the X20 and 653 are about the same performance.

The Snapdragon 625 actually performed a little better.

First of all, we must understand that although there are many eight-core and ten-core mobile phones on the market, most of them cannot be fully opened at all in actual use, because the heat generation is extremely high, not to mention the full state, this is not because they are "fake eight cores" and "fake ten cores", but the current scientific level limitations.

In terms of performance, although the X20 is a little stronger, the specifications are also higher. However, due to the backward manufacturing process, the X20 makes the chip generate great heat, not only that, but also the heat will reduce the frequency of the mobile phone and lock the core, and the performance will be reduced, which is why playing games with X20 is very smooth at the beginning and will soon become a card. And it also depends on the manufacturer's scheduling,Some manufacturers are very aggressive about X20 scheduling,Often ten cores、Eight cores are fully open,Heating does not reduce frequency,Performance is not bad,But the temperature of the mobile phone will even soar instantaneously50。

As for the 625, although it is positioned as a mid-range chip, due to the use of a more advanced process and low-power architecture, the eight cores can run at a high frequency for a long time, and the actual use is very smooth, and most mainstream games are easy and smooth to play.