What is the urban rural income ratio? Is it disposable income or net income??? 5

There is only disposable income for urban residents, and there is no disposable income for rural residents.

There is only the per capita net income of rural residents, and there is no per capita net income of urban residents.

They're both single, and you can compare the two, but it's not interesting. You don't have to dwell on this, anyway, one of them represents the income of urban residents and the other represents the income of rural residents, but the names are different.

1. From the meaning of the indicator.

The disposable income of urban residents refers to the income that can be used to arrange daily life in the actual income of urban residents, because most urban residents are wage income. The net income of farmers refers to the income owned by farmers after deducting the corresponding expenses (such as fertilizers, pesticides, taxes, etc.) from the total income of farmers.

2. From the perspective of morphological composition.

There is only one form of disposable income for urban residents, that is, the form of value. It simply reflects the cash income of urban residents.

There are two actual forms of peasants' net income, one is the form of value, and the other is the form of goods, which mainly refers to the grain, edible oil, vegetables, meat, poultry and eggs kept by the peasants. It reflects not only the cash income of the peasants, but also the income in kind of the peasants.

3. From the perspective of disposable content.

The disposable income of urban residents is the income that is used entirely to organize daily life.

In addition to being used for daily consumption, a considerable part of the peasants' net income should be set aside for additional production expenses** for peasants' production and expanded reproduction.

Disposable income of urban households Net income of rural households.

The disposable income and net income of rural residents are different concepts, and there are obvious differences in amount.

The disposable income of rural residents refers to the sum of all incomes, transfer income and net property income actually obtained by rural permanent resident households during the accounting period (usually one year). Disposable income excludes necessary social deductions (e.g., personal income tax, social security expenses, etc.), so its actual value will be slightly larger than net income.

The per capita net income of rural residents refers to the total net income actually obtained by rural permanent resident households during the accounting period (usually one year), after deducting necessary social deductions (such as income tax and social security expenses). Net income usually includes household business income, wage income, net property income and net transfer income, but excludes ** property and borrowing income.

According to public information, the disposable income of rural residents is usually higher than the per capita net income of rural residents. However, the exact amount varies by region and time of day. Therefore, when comparing the disposable income and net income of rural residents, it is necessary to consider regional and time factors to obtain accurate monetary differences.

To sum up, there are obvious differences in the concept and amount of disposable income and net income of rural residents. Disposable income is usually higher than net income, but the exact amount varies by region and time of day.

The disposable income and per capita net income are more than the disposable income. According to the information related to the inquiry, as of November 14, 2022, the per capita disposable income of rural areas was 43,598 yuan per year, and the per capita net income of rural residents was 17,969 yuan per year.

Ratio of income of urban and rural residents = urban residents.

Income Income of rural residents.

Before 1990, the income of urban residents Rural income = , income of urban residents - income of rural residents = 714

After 1994, the income of urban residents Rural income = , income of urban residents - income of rural residents = 1624

So let's take the peasant's income as x in 1990 and the peasant's income as y in 1994

In 1990, the income of urban residents was the income of the world, and in 1994, the income of urban residents was , and.

x =714, =1624

Thus the solution is x=840, y=

Therefore, in 1990, the per capita income of peasants was 840 yuan.

Supplement: From 1995 to 1998, the income gap between urban and rural residents fell briefly. The income ratio between urban and rural residents has decreased to 2,037 yuan, and the trend of the absolute income gap has been curbed, only from 1,935 yuan to 2,037 yuan.

Here, as in the above method, we still assume that the income of farmers in 1995 is z, then the income of urban residents in 95 years is the absolute difference between them

z = 1935 then x is :z= 1935 (;

And the income just calculated in 1990 is x=714 (

Then the first question is z x=[1935 (

Then calculate the 99-07 years, let the rural income of 07 be A, and the urban income of 07 years will be, so there is.

So a = 7527 (This is the farmer's income in '07.)

And as I said earlier, the ratio = income of urban residents and income of rural residents.

So the income of urban dwellers is = 7527 (12291

The urban-rural income ratio is an important indicator to measure the urban-rural income gap.

Ratio of income of urban and rural residents = income of urban residents Income of rural residents. Spinal skin.

1. The definitions are different

The disposable income of rural residents is the average value of all the products produced by peasants in a given period of time in a production unit, production sector, region or the entire national economy. An index that comprehensively reflects the total scale of production within a certain range. It includes all the value formed in the production process of the product, that is, the value of the consumption of material materials transferred to the product and the value of the new creation.

The net income of farmers refers to the sum of the main business income, the operating income and other business income. In accounting, gross sales are equal to the value of sales revenue or inflow of assets in the form of sales**. Generally, it is the main business income.

2. The scope of inclusion is different

Disposable income of rural residents: generally refers to the total quantity and amount of individual production by farmers, including the average value of unsold and ungenerated inventory

The net income of farmers is the sum of the income from the main business, the operating income, and the income from other businesses, and the total income of some circulating peasant enterprises is calculated as the income from the price difference, that is, the gross profit.

3. The calculation method is different

The formula for calculating the disposable income of rural residents is as follows:

Net operating income = operating income - operating expenses - depreciation of productive fixed assets - production tax +

Net income from renting out housing, net income from leasing other assets and net rent converted from owner-owned housing, etc. Net property income excludes proceeds from the sale of ownership of assets.

Net Transfer Income is calculated as follows: Net Transfer Income = Transfer Income - Transfer Expenses.

The formula for calculating farmers' net income is expressed as follows: real growth rate of per capita disposable income = (per capita disposable income in the reporting period per capita disposable income in the base period) Household consumption ** index -100%.

4. The role is different

The disposable income of rural residents reflects the average income of rural residents, while the net income of peasants reflects the living standards of peasants.

Encyclopedia - Disposable income of rural residents.

Encyclopedia - Farmers' net income.

1.Determination of the appropriateness of the urban-rural income gap.

Internationally, it is usually based on the Gini coefficient.

As a criterion, the income gap is divided into moderate income gap and inappropriate income gap. According to international practice, income disparities are moderate when the Gini coefficient is between, especially in between. And when the Gini coefficient is below or above, the income gap is inadequate.

The Gini coefficient below means that the income distribution is too even. In such a state, people are in a state of competition and lack of vitality, which is not conducive to the mobilization of people's enthusiasm and the national economy.

Efficiency improvements. The Gini coefficient above means that the income distribution is too large, which will have serious negative social effects. The principle of moderation of income disparity also applies between urban and rural areas, but because the urban-rural income gap index is most commonly used to measure urban-rural income disparity.

Therefore, the urban-rural income gap index, that is, the urban-rural per capita income ratio, is generally used to illustrate the moderation of the urban-rural income gap. According to the International Labour Organization.

In 1995, the vast majority of the 36 countries published had a rural-urban per capita income ratio of less than two, and only three countries had a ratio of more than two. Accordingly, many scholars regard the urban-rural income index as a moderate warning line for the urban-rural income gap.

2.The moderation of the income gap between urban and rural areas in China.

Statistics show that the income gap index between urban and rural residents in China has been at a level from 2000 to 2004. According to the internationally accepted evaluation indicators, the income gap between urban and rural areas in China is very large, and it has long crossed the international warning line.

However, in fact, due to the great diversity of the situation of different countries, the meaning of the same level of urban-rural income gap index in different countries at different stages of development and in the same period of time is different, and the corresponding socio-economic phenomena and consequences are very different. The land area of our country is vast, the agricultural population is large, and the geographical conditions are very different, so we cannot blindly apply international practices when it comes to the moderation of China's income gap. Instead, the relationship between the urban-rural income gap and the country's economic and social stability should be analyzed in detail.

A moderate level of income gap between urban and rural areas should be commensurate with a certain level of economic development and development stage, which can not only support or promote the sustained and efficient development of the national economy, but also be conducive to social stability and progress. According to this criterion, we will examine the situation of China's economic development and social stability since the beginning of reform and opening up.

1. The definitions are different

Disposable income is the sum of the consumption expenditure and savings that residents can use for the most important purposes, that is, the income that residents can use for free disposal. The per capita net income of peasants refers to the "net income of peasants" per capita according to the rural population.

2. The specific content is different.

The disposable income of urban residents is the income that is used entirely to organize daily life. In addition to being used for daily consumption, a considerable part of the peasants' net income should be set aside for additional production expenses** for peasants' production and expanded reproduction.

3. The meaning is different.

Household income is considered to be the most important determinant of consumer spending, and is therefore often used to measure changes in a country's standard of living. In China's rural social and economic statistics, the per capita net income of farmers is a very important statistical indicator. It reflects the average income of rural residents in a country or region.

4. The calculation method is different.

Residents' disposable income = salary income + net operating income + property net income + transfer net income.

The formula for calculating the per capita net income of farmers is as follows: per capita net income of farmers = (total income of rural households - household operating expenses - depreciation of productive fixed assets - taxes and contract fees - survey subsidies) permanent resident population of rural households.

The urban-rural income ratio is a technical term, pinyin chéng xiāng jū mín shōu rù bǐ, which is an important indicator of the urban-rural income gap. The urban-rural income ratio is an important indicator to measure the urban-rural income gap. On 15 September 2012, the first "Blue Book of Social Management – Report on Social Management Innovation in China" was released, and the income ratio of urban and rural residents in the mainland is doubled, and the gap between the rich and the poor is further widening.

On September 15, 2012, the Beijing International Institute of Urban Development and China Social Sciences Academic Press jointly released the first "Blue Book of Social Management - Report on China's Social Management Innovation". The report pointed out that behind the fruitful achievements of China's reform and opening up, there are various complex and changeable risks of instability: the gap between the rich and the poor is further widening, approaching the social tolerance line; Conflicts between the government and the people, as well as between the police and the people, have intensified.

In the early 80s of the 20th century, China's Gini coefficient was, and since 2010, it has reached the 90s of the century, and the Gini coefficient has increased at an annual rate of one percentage point, and there is a possibility of further expansion. According to the survey data cited in the Blue Book, the current income ratio of urban and rural residents in China has reached twice that of the city, and the highest international uproar is about twice that of the world.

According to the data provided by this Blue Book, the difference between the highest and lowest wages of workers in China's industry is about 15 times; The income gap between the executives of listed state-owned enterprises and front-line workers is about 18 times, and the difference between the average salary of executives of state-owned enterprises and the society is 128 times. The income gap between the top 10 per cent and the bottom 10 per cent has doubled from 1988 to 23 times in 2007. <>