Rich people gather, and the 10 prefecture level cities with the highest per capita disposable income

Generally speaking, a city's per capita GDP is more indicative of a city's affluence and living standards; The per capita income of a city indicates the average income level of a city, and the per capita GDP of the city is more accurate to see the affluence and living standard of a city.

Extended Information:1A city's per capita income, or average income, measures the average income per person in a region (city, region, country, etc.) over a given time period (usually a year).

It is an important indicator of a country's economic development level, economic strength, and people's living standards. It is inversely proportional to population growth and directly proportional to national income growth.

2.GDP per capita of a city: is the gross domestic product of a city divided by the number of people in the city in the middle of the year. It is often used as an indicator of economic development in development economics and is one of the most important macroeconomic indicators.

3.Latest GDP per capita: At present, the latest national GDP per capita ranking is released, with 12 cities with a per capita GDP of more than $20,000.

Among them, Hong Kong's per capita GDP has reached US$10,000, ranking first among cities in the country and reaching the level of a highly developed economy.

GDP per capita and income per capita are two indicators that are both related and distinct. GDP per capita is a reflection of the new value created by the whole society calculated by population, from the perspective of distribution, it includes national income (that is, taxes), enterprise income (that is, corporate profits and depreciation of fixed assets) and labor income, so the concept of per capita GDP is larger than per capita income, that is, personal income (including the income of urban and rural residents) is only a component of GDP. It can be understood like this:

Personal GDP: the value you create + the value you consume; National GDP: the value created by 1.4 billion people + the value of consumption by 1.4 billion people; GDP per capita:

The value created by 1.4 billion people + the value of consumption by 1.4 billion people) 1.4 billion; Income per capita: an equal distribution of value created by 1.4 billion people.

Per capita GDP reflects the economic development level of a city, and per capita income reflects the average income level of a city, per capita income may be better, but the reflection of a city's affluence and living standard can not only look at the per capita index, but also need to combine the median income to see, for example, there are three people, one person 900 yuan, one person 2,100 yuan, one person 300,000 yuan, their per capita income is 101,000 yuan, But the median income is $2,100.

Guangdong's personal income tax is twice as much as Jiangsu's, but its per capita GDP is much less than Jiangsu's. Is it that Jiangsu does not have to pay individual income tax or is Jiangsu too poor, and there are too few people in Jiangsu who can reach the individual income tax threshold? Why is GDP per capita so high?

I don't think so, the happiness index should speak for itself.

I think it should be able to explain.

These cities are generally from Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Jiangsu coastal cities, such as Kunshan, Suzhou or Wenzhou.

In our country, not only is the income gap between urban and rural areas very large, but also the income gap in some areas is also very large, and the per capita income of different urban residents is also different. <>

Obviously, this is also related to the level of economic development of the region, if you want to ask which cities in our country have higher incomes, the first thing that comes to mind is Shanghai, Shanghai as the magic capital, it is a very economically developed place, it can be said that it is far ahead in China, ahead of the economic level of other cities, so many people will definitely think that Shanghai's disposable income will be very high. Of course, this is indeed the caseAccording to the news released by the National Bureau of Statistics, it can be seen that in 2020, the per capita income of residents in Shanghai is indeed much higher than that of other cities.

According to this statistical data, we can see that the second place is Beijing, as the capital of our country, its economic development of course can not lag behind, Beijing's development is also strongly supported by many policiesWe all know that the housing prices in Beijing are very amazing, if you have a house in Beijing, you may be a multimillionaire, so it is well deserved as the second place in Beijing. Zhejiang Province is followed by Zhejiang, which has much lower incomes than Beijing and Shanghai, but is also far ahead of other cities. Zhejiang, as a coastal city, has also been taken care of by the situation of economic development.

We are also more familiar with the development level of coastal cities. Therefore, it is certainly no problem that the per capita income of Zhejiang residents is high. <>

Finally, most of those residents with relatively high incomes are indeed distributed in coastal cities, and if the income of urban residents in our country is sorted from high to low, it can be seen that Beijing and Shanghai rank first and second, and then continue to decrease from coastal cities to inland cities.

I think it should be Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Nanjing, Tianjin and other places, these cities are well-developed and have high per capita income.

At present, in Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Nanjing and other cities in China, the per capita disposable income of residents is relatively high. Because these cities are developing relatively fast, the economic level is relatively high.

Cities with higher per capita disposable income are still concentrated in first-tier cities and new first-tier cities, which have developed economies and higher consumption, so residents' wages are also higher, and the relative per capita disposable income is also higher.

Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen have relatively high per capita resources, and many talents are first-hand resources, and they have a good position in the country.

b. The original side question tests the correct understanding of the material. In view of the widening of the income gap between Chinese residents and the emergence of some phenomena of social unrest and the collapse of certain factors, the state's most important and direct method is to readjust the relationship of interests and handle contradictions. Therefore, the choice is indirect, so it is not chosen.

Correct answer B.

Answer B: This question tests the correct understanding of the material. In view of the widening of the income gap between Chinese residents and the emergence of some factors of social instability, the most important and direct way for the state to lose money is to readjust the relationship of interests and handle contradictions. Therefore, the choice is indirect, so it is not chosen.

Correct answer B.