Can I fight for the child, can I fight for the custody of the child?

If you are not weaned, and your life is very stable, you have a good income and a house, then you have a much better chance of getting a child than him, and if you do not notarize your property before marriage, then the property and debts are divided equally between you.

Considering that the son is young, it is estimated that it is no problem for you to fight for custody, and the money during the period of living together belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife and should be divided equally.

Persuade the landlord that his son is only 11 months old, so don't come to this step as a last resort! Everything is good for business and good quantity! Good to come and go! Wishing you happiness!

It should be possible, because the child has not been breastfeeding. The money in your card should still be yours.

The money in the card is mainly up to you, and if the money is your own, he doesn't have the face to ask for it to be shared with you. Children, such a small size is generally given to the mother, unless you have no ability at all, then it may not be able to fight.

If you want to get divorced, why did you get married in the first place?! It's hard for the child.

If you are a smart mother, don't fight with your husband for children, so that you can easily remarry and have children, otherwise it will be very troublesome.

It depends on your situation, if your economic and educational conditions are better than your husband's, it will be easy for you to get it, and it will not be easy to do otherwise. The money in your own card depends on whether it is before or after marriage, and if it is after marriage, it must be divided equally.

As long as you have a legitimate occupation and independent financial ability, generally such a small baby will be awarded to the woman. As for the distribution of the property, it is up to you to negotiate, and he will pay maintenance on a monthly basis.

Such a young child is still breastfeeding, and it is awarded to the mother, but if the mother has the ability to raise it, there is no problem, and the money in your card is the joint property of the husband and wife.

The baby is so small that it needs the care of the mother, so the child is more likely to be with you. The money in your card is also the joint property of the husband and wife, so it needs to be divided equally.

It depends on which of you husband and wife has the ability to take care of the children, and the property of the husband and wife is divided equally!

Your money shouldn't be split equally, and the possibility of having a son is a bit small.

As long as it is your joint property, it will be scored.

No, you can get the right to support, and your husband will have to give you money then.

Child Custody: 1Children under the age of two generally live with their mothers.

2.For minor children over the age of two, it is to be properly resolved in accordance with the principle of being conducive to the healthy growth of the child, taking into account the specific circumstances of both parents' ability to raise them and the conditions for raising them. 3.

Children over the age of 10 should refer to the child's opinion. If there is a fixed salary or a fixed income, it is generally 20% to 30% of the fixed salary

Overall, How do you sentence children in divorce? The court mainly considers the following factors when deciding on the custody of the child: first, the age of the child; second, the economic status of both husband and wife; third, the educational level of both sides; the fourth is the child's will (refers to the child who is slightly older and can express his or her intentions); fifth, children's living habits; Sixth, the grandparents have the will and ability to support the grandparents, etc., but the general principle is:

Whether awarding custody of a child to a party is conducive to the child's future development. If the case is complicated, or both parties want to raise the child alone, then at this time, if a professional marriage and family lawyer intervenes and provides advice, it will be more certain to fight for the custody of the child. After all, how do you sentence children in divorce?

The battle for custody of a divorced child is sometimes more like a war, and when it comes to legal expertise and litigation skills, personal enthusiasm and wishful thinking are not enough.

Favorable conditions for fighting for custody: 1. Proving that you have undergone sterilization or lost your fertility due to other reasons is conducive to the ownership of the custody of the divorced children and the support of the divorced children; 2. Prove that the child has lived with him for a long time, and changing the living environment is obviously not conducive to the healthy growth of the child; 3. The other party suffers from an infectious disease that cannot be cured for a long time; Wait a minute.

The court's decision is based on a number of factors and conditions: If you have an objective income, a stable relief situation, and are suitable for educating your children and providing a good environment for growth, you have a good chance of winning custody of your children. The court will determine which side is more beneficial to the child's development. In fact, the biggest harm of divorce is children.

Nowadays, many couples are too rash about divorce and only think about themselves. Didn't think about it for the child. I hope that every parent thinks more about their children.

Make a decision to divorce carefully. When the husband and wife divorce, the children are the most hurt, who does the children belong to? Can you win over the child?

Everything should be beneficial to the child, if the child is not yet an adult, you can negotiate with each other to help the child's growth, if the child is older, it is difficult to listen to the child's wishes. Emotionally, your little ones. And yes, you don't have a lot of emotions in your home.

From an early age, you can't change his habits right away. This is not conducive to the growth of children. If you are more than 10 years older.

He has autonomy, he still won't choose you, she puts all her feelings into it. Mom's relatives. How do you shake his feelings?

It's hard, it's hard. Let's start from the basic area of children's education and economy! Does your family have?

It will be better than your wife. It is more conducive to the growth of your child in the future. Let's start with this aspect and think about it!

Is it possible to fight for it?

Can you win over the child? The first thing to look at is how much you earn? Whether it is stable or not.

When the court decides who to raise the child, it generally depends on the financial ability, most of the time it is awarded to the man, and when the child is young, the court will not ask for the child's opinion, so the main thing is your income.

Try your best to fight for it, after all, you are your biological father, and you should fight for custody in law and reason, if the court rules that you will be raised by your mother, you can only pay child support on a monthly basis. But you also have to find time to spend more time with your children, otherwise after a long time, you will become estranged from you, which will affect your father-son relationship, so take time to take care of it more.

The court will award to the party who is better off financially.

may not be able to win it, from birth to the present, it is a woman with children, and you have not fulfilled the responsibility of a father. Moreover, there is a high probability that the child will be awarded to the mother at a young age.

When the husband and wife divorce, the children are the most hurt, who does the children belong to? Can you win over the child? Everything should be beneficial to the child, if the child is not yet an adult, you can negotiate with each other to benefit the child's growth, if the child is older, you must listen to the child's wishes.

If the child is very young, don't fight for the right to support, the child has grown up in his grandmother's house since birth, and he should be closer to that side, can you bring the child over alone, let your parents take the child and your parents have a good relationship? I don't think it's a problem with whom the children go after the divorce, the question is whether you often go to see the children and care about the children, you are good to the children, and the children will naturally be close to you when they grow up, and you can no longer give the children a complete home, so there is no need to fight for the right to support.

The relationship between the two is not good, how to say it, you have to stick to it for the sake of the child, she can't help it if she wants to divorce, ** the child you want to come back, the child follows you, and when you get married in the future, does your wife have to take good care of the child? It's impossible, it's better not to get divorced, and the children will be pitiful if they get divorced.

Try your best. The odds are slim. Generally, children follow their mothers, as long as you wash him, a certain life will not be successful.

It should be ok. If you don't have a good job, you don't have a certain income. What's the use of winning it?

If you earn more than his mom. Estimate that you are very likely. As long as your salary is higher than what you paid in the previous period.

You may be able to take custody of your child.

It seems that your child is not big, because it has always been grandparents, and they also have a certain affection, the two of you want to divorce, and the child is more likely to be awarded to the woman, and the court considers that this is conducive to the growth of the child, this is not absolute, depending on the result of the negotiation between the two of you, no matter who gets the custody of the child, it is the same, it is a purpose, and you want the child to grow up healthily.

It is very unlikely, because neither you nor your parents have raised him, so he has no emotional basis with you, and even if you pull the child hard, you may not be able to go.

The key is how old the child is, whether it is more than three years old, if not, it is better not to fight for it, the child is too young, and he has been living with his mother and grandmother, even if he fights for it, the child has no sense of security, and if he has time to think about this, it is better to communicate with his wife, it is better not to divorce, the most child is really bad.

How old is the child now? If it's under three years old, don't think about it. Can't get it. The child is breastfeeding. Even if the child is divorced, the court will award it directly to the mother. You can talk to a lawyer.

The custody of the child is vested in the child's interest.

If you want to win the child, you can get it through legal proceedings, we must have custody of the child, autonomy and all the obligations of the child, if you meet these conditions, then you can go to the judge to file a lawsuit, and get the child back.

If you want to fight for the custody of the child, your living environment must be higher than that of your wife, a good living environment is conducive to the growth of the child, and it depends on the child's right to choose, these are the conditions awarded to you by the court

The first is to look at the child's choice, if the child is sensible, it is up to the child's choice. The second depends on who is at fault of both parties in the divorce, if the fault lies with you, then the woman has the right of first choice. The third is that the two sides need to negotiate.

Originally, your divorce will affect the child, leaving a shadow for a lifetime, you parents really can't live and can't force it, after all, feelings can't be forced, but the custody of the child mainly depends on which party has this condition and ability, if he is happy with his mother, I don't think there is anything bad.

This depends on the financial ability of the two of you, which is better, but according to the child's current situation, it is a little difficult for you to fight for the custody of the child, after all, the child is brought up by the grandmother, the main thing is to see the child's wishes to see who the child wants to live with, I wish you happiness.

Well, it's best for the child to stay in front of the mother, because the mother takes care of her very easily, and then the man should take care of the child without um, the lady takes care of it, joe because the child stays in the mother's house after all and sings, and the family is emotional, right? Well, anyway, when it comes to two people getting divorced, it is always the children who are hurt, no matter who stays in front of them, it is not possible to lack father's love and mother's love.

Divorce is the biggest harm to children, since you are so reluctant to fight for your children, why not solve the problem from the source, and give the children a second harm.

It is best for the husband and wife to coordinate with the child. You all have to think from the child's point of view. The ability to divorce has already caused harm to the children. It is best to take care of the children in other matters of the divorce.

You haven't brought the child since birth, which means that you are not suitable for taking the child, does the child have feelings for you? People have given birth to your children, why should they divorce you, your family has never brought children, and the living habits of the children are different from yours, which will hurt the children, so it is good to be a good father and often go over to see more to give the children a good impression, the children want a warm home, and it doesn't matter who they are, and cherish it.

Considering the young age of the child, it is estimated that it is no problem for you to fight for custody, and the money during the period of living together belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife and should be divided equally ......

First of all, it depends on the age of the child. If it is in lactation for sure. If the friend period is exceeded, then it depends on the child. Decision. As long as the child agrees to go to your house, then you have to hope. It may be difficult to say if you don't know.

Divorced. As long as you all love this child in your hearts, no matter who the child is by, the child is considered happy. She wants you not to interfere, after all, the child has always been there.

When the child is older, he will be sensible to your child and his father. You can often go to see your children and take them out for a walk. You have to do what you have to do.

Otherwise, you will lose your child.

As parents must want to keep their children by their side, you come to the step of divorce, the most hurt is the child, in the current situation, the possibility of you winning the child is very small, let the child stay with the mother, you can go back to see the child from time to time, let the child feel your real love for him.

What is the divorce, as soon as you get divorced, you have nothing, if you don't divorce, it's all yours, and the man is married.

You have to be responsible, you can't let your wife and children down, and you can't give up your marriage easily, so let's fight for it.

The custody of children under the age of two generally belongs to the woman, and the child is over ten years old, and the opinions of the child are mainly listened to.

If the two parties are over the age of two but under the age of 10, and the two parties cannot reach an agreement due to a dispute over the custody of the child, the people's court shall make a judgment based on the rights and interests of the child and the specific circumstances of both parties.

Below is what I pasted and I think will help you further understand this child custody dispute, you can check it out:

1. Children under the age of two generally live with their mothers. If the mother has any of the following circumstances, she may live with the father:

1) Suffering from incurable infectious diseases or other serious diseases, and the child is not suitable to live with them;

2) There are conditions for raising the child and the obligation to support the child is not fulfilled, and the father requires the child to live with him;

3) For other reasons, the child is unable to live with the mother.

2. Where both parents agree that a child under the age of two lives with the father and there is no adverse impact on the healthy growth of the child, it may be permitted.

3. For children over the age of two years, both the father and the mother request to live with them, and one of the following circumstances may be given priority:

1) Have undergone sterilization or have lost their fertility due to other reasons;

2) The child has lived with the child for a long time, and changing the living environment is obviously not conducive to the healthy growth of the child;

3) There are no other children, and the other party has other children;

4) The child lives with him, which is beneficial to the child's growth, and the other party suffers from a long-term infectious disease or other serious disease, or has other circumstances that are not conducive to the child's physical and mental health, and it is not suitable to live with the child.

4. The conditions for the father and the mother to raise the child are basically the same, and both parties require the child to live with the child, but the child has lived alone with the grandparents for many years, and the grandparents request and have the ability to help the child take care of the grandchild, it may be considered as a priority condition for the child to live with the parent.

5. In the event of a dispute between the parents over the age of 10 over that a minor child over the age of 10 is living with his or her father or mother, the child's opinion shall be taken into account.

6. On the premise that it is conducive to protecting the interests of the child, where the parents agree to take turns raising the child, it may be permitted.