The reality is that men give birth to children and women go to work?

The formulation in your question seems to be a bit excessive. And this "over" is not only"It is not logical for men to have children (as absurd as "the rooster will lay eggs"), and it is an exaggeration to say that "the reality is that men are at home with children and women at work".

In terms of the real workplace, men work far more than women.

Therefore, whether it is "a man gives birth to a child" or "a man gives birth to a child and a woman goes to work", this statement is just like a friend upstairs - "this is against the natural laws of society".

I can't think of what reason you came up with such a question.

Hopefully mine will make you aware of something.

Men have children? I'm talking about the unreal world. The reality is that a woman gives birth to a child, and she has to go to work after giving birth.

Well, I like men to have children and women to work, so that they can experience the feeling of being depressed, sleepy, bored, degraded, and hurt by the lack of oxygen to the brain at home. Then the woman goes out to spend all day drinking, and when she comes home, she picks up her face.

The reality is that men can't have children, so they should go to work to earn money, and women take care of children at home?

Male and female are indistinguishable, it is difficult to distinguish between truth and falsehood, and there are many kinds of biological worlds, just like a branch of flowers, and green leaves.

What a possibility, the reality is that there are still more men at work.

This is contrary to the natural laws of society.

I hope that your wish will come true soon.

First of all, physiologically, the work of having a child requires a woman to do it. She was pregnant for ten months and gave birth in one day.

Secondly, from the perspective of feelings and responsibility. Giving birth to a child is a matter of two people, a man and a woman. Because of love, hoping to reproduce offspring, and giving birth to the crystallization of love, it should be a matter for two people.

Third, it is very hard for a woman to have a child. Men should provide financial security for women during pregnancy and childbirth. And care more about women. This is the duty and obligation of a man.

Therefore, it is a woman's job to have a child, but it needs to be shared by both men and women.

Giving birth to a child is a matter for both husband and wife, not that giving birth to a child is a one-sided man's business, or a woman's business, giving birth to a child is a matter for both husband and wife, but neither party can do it.

Giving birth to a child is a common thing for both men and women, that is to say, it is indispensable for both men and women, so children are the crystallization of both men and women, of course, it is a matter of two people.

It's a matter for both men and women, and no single party can do anything about this project.

Having a child is a matter for both men and women, and both are indispensable.

Giving birth to a child is a matter for both men and women, but the woman pays more, so the man must let the woman eat better, which is also good for the child.

Giving birth to a child is a common thing for both men and women, and for the sake of the child, it is necessary to quit smoking and drinking.

Giving birth to a child is a matter between two families, because pregnancy requires both men and women.

Hello. Giving birth to a child is a matter even for men.

It's also a woman's thing.

It is a matter of cooperation between men and women.

It's indispensable.

Although the child is born of a woman's pregnancy, it is also inseparable from the help of a man, otherwise it is impossible for a woman to have a child.

No woman can't have children anyway, a man can sleep and a woman can run away, and a woman can't help it.

Both men and women are responsible.

Reproductive rights are also enjoyed by men.

Recently, the news that the husband held his wife accountable on the grounds that his reproductive rights were violated after the wife terminated her pregnancy has attracted everyone's attention and caused related discussions. With regard to the question of whether men have the right to procreate, and whether the termination of pregnancy by a wife violates the husband's right to procreate, it can be seen that both the wife and the husband have the right to have children, the wife has the right to terminate the pregnancy, and the husband and wife should reach a consensus on the issue of childbearing.

First, both wives and husbands have the right to procreate. Therefore, men also have the right to reproduce. According to the relevant regulations, both wives and husbands have the right to procreate.

Therefore, men also have the right to reproduce. It should be noted that the reproductive rights enjoyed by men and women are enjoyed separately, that is to say, both husbands and wives have their own reproductive rights, and the reproductive rights of each other do not affect or infringe on each other.

Second, the wife has the right to terminate the pregnancy, and this kind of behavior does not infringe on the husband's reproductive rights. Since both husband and wife have their own reproductive rights, the wife has the right to terminate the pregnancy. Such an act does not infringe on the husband's reproductive rights.

Moreover, a husband cannot argue that his or her reproductive rights have been violated on the ground that his wife has terminated her pregnancy. If he thinks so or holds his wife responsible, it is an act of infringing on his wife's reproductive rights.

Third, on the issue of whether to give birth to oak and raise children, the husband and wife should reach a consensus. Both husband and wife have their own reproductive rights, but as husband and wife, they must exercise their reproductive rights together, and cannot exercise their reproductive rights separately. Otherwise, the husband and wife will not be able to agree on the issue of procreation, and the result will be irresolvable contradictions.

Therefore, on the issue of exercising reproductive rights, husband and wife should reach an agreement through negotiation, so as to avoid unnecessary contradictions and make family life harmonious, stable, and happy.

It's still unrealistic, unless it's a human being who is going to mutate.

This study is indeed an important breakthrough, but it is important to note that this study does not mean that it is a reality for men to have children.

In this study, some genes were removed from the egg and mother cells of a female mouse through genetic technology and these cells were transplanted into the ovaries of another mouse, so that the mouse produced offspring. Although this technology has been successfully applied in mice, more research and experiments are needed to apply this technology to humans.

In addition, even if this technology is successfully applied in humans, ethical and moral issues need to be taken into account. For example, whether this technology should be widely used, and for those who cannot have children naturally, whether Qiao Biqing should use this technology to have offspring and so on.

I don't think it's for my husband, it's what I want to give birth to, and it's useless if I don't want to give birth to anyone. So I don't understand that the child is born for her husband and for her mother-in-law.

No, women are often forced to give birth to children, and they don't even think clearly why they give birth to children in a daze, and then that's all they can do.

No, it's for yourself, for the day when you get old in the future, someone to accompany you, someone to take care of at the bedside, but part of it is also for love.

Of course not, having a child is the most powerful testimony of the love of two people, and it is also the continuation of two people's lives, not for anyone.

No, although there may be some of them, because the mothers in the world are not necessarily competent, but those competent mothers must want to have children, and it is impossible for them to have children because of men, knowing that children are part of the family.

No, children are the crystallization of love, not unilaterally for whom, two people will have a child when they come together and their feelings reach a certain foundation.

No, a woman gives birth to a child for love, but also for herself, after all, it is her own blood and bones, the inheritance of blood, and the crystallization of love.

No, it's for yourself, it's for the whole family, it's not for boys, having a child is a big deal, how can it be said that it's for boys.

I think yes, although most women don't agree with this statement, the underlying consciousness is still born because of men.

When a woman gives birth to a child, it is the most important period in her life, and creating a new life and experiencing the pride of being a mother is a feeling that only those who have experienced it can understand.

But in today's society, there are too many rules and regulations for women, and women who give birth to children not only have to suffer from pregnancy in October and childbirth, but also have to wander back and forth between children and careers.

There's a word that's in vogue these days: pastoral feminism. A new type of online buzzword refers to a group of women who actively fight for equality between men and women on the surface, but in fact only want to obtain the same power as men, but do not have to bear obligations.

Inevitably, in the comments of some women's emotional articles, some netizens actually said: Marriage, the house is provided by a man, the car is also a man, and most of the family's expenses are men, what about you women, you earn it when you get married, why?

There is a reply that is: Doesn't that woman have children after getting married, doesn't she raise children and doesn't do housework? If a man can't provide a house, why should a woman have children?

The current social phenomenon is like this, women will be more stressed than men, as if taking care of children should be done by women.