I want to buy a card camera What is the most practical card camera right now?

According to the landlord's request: recommend F75 (F70) I recently bought! With 8g card to start 1500 yuan, ultra-thin card telephoto king!! Easy to carry!!

I've been inspecting it for more than half a month, and this is the best value!! Absolutely assured, the absolute best value for money!! (I bought it on **).

Recommend ****, find a person who buys more, and the evaluation is good, it must be no problem!

More than 500 lower than supermarkets online!

10x light variation, 1 2CCD, wide angle, high brightness screen, EXR CCD, high ISO (12800) low noise, and clear night scenes!

It is rich in functions, with some M gears, telephoto, enhanced low light, strengthened subject, several compositing, etc., and strong playability.

The shape is cool, there are a lot of functions, it is very practical, some manual, and the cost performance is super high!

If you check it on the Internet, a camera with an excellent reputation is now super popular, and the price has actually increased in the past two weeks!! The first time I saw the price of digital products rise, hehe.

Many people recommend Fujifilm's F200 and F75

I think it's ......Although the picture quality of these two models is good, there is not much difference in the picture quality of the card machine.

Among the card players, I prefer Canon's IXUS series, such as IXUS, etc.

Canon's card players are indeed slightly more expensive than other brands in terms of the same hardware configuration.

However, its workmanship, optical strength, and image stabilization are not realized in the hardware configuration.

Canon workmanship? It seems that the problem is not less than that of others.,And say that the picture quality of the card machine is not much different.,And say that Canon optical strength,A certain building is really interesting.,I'll also put a big talk to play.,The F60FD seckill ixus system I have at hand.。

It's hard to say the specific model, but the brand is Fuji's...

I don't know the data you said, I bought it myself, Canon ixus130, 1700, and I think it's pretty good for my own use.

Canon Ixus 115 HS is about 1500, which is the most popular back-illuminated COMS model now, mainly because the night view is good, if you want to be more cost-effective, then 105 can also be considered. Canon and A3200 also take the cost-effective route, but forget it, the wide angle is too small.

The Sony DSC-W350 is okay, it is Sony's most cost-effective model. Sony's DSC-T99C is a sleek-looking card player. Looks good. It's all within your budget.

Panasonic's price-performance ratio is very good, such as FH1, FH3, FP1 and FP3You can see, the performance is very strong, but it is cheaper than the above.

Fujifilm also has Fujifilm F85EXR, Fujifilm T305 and Fujifilm Z91 OK.

Nikon is very famous, consumer cameras are very average, Nikon S6000 is okay, it can only be regarded as a more balanced cost-effective model.

All the cameras can now basically take pictures, which is not a problem at all.

If you want to go cost-effective, it is recommended that Panasonic and Fuji take a look. It's up to you which one you like.

The above ones are all cheaper, and the slightly higher ones are also Panasonic's ZS5 ZS7Sony's 300hs are all good.

Sony is good, you can buy it for about 2000, and it's very good-looking, in fact, things at this price point don't matter how the performance is, it's almost the same, I think you'd better go to the mall and look at the Internet, no matter how you introduce it, it's better to take a look.

Go to Jingdong according to the brand,**Search,Don't pick the rest。 Card machines make no difference. Recommended brands, Canon, Nikon,

The Sony TX10 seems to have a blue shell, but it's more than 2K.

The Canon A3300is is also available.

There used to be an ixus80, which was very easy to use, but now it feels a bit low-end, ixus95 seems to be used by colleagues, and it should be good. I just bought a Canon SX200 some time ago, it's not bad, the bare metal 1800 I bought on Amazon, plus other accessories 2100 is less, it's a little stupid, but the effect is very good, the telephoto is very good, recommended.

Sony's are generally more beautiful, and I've used someone else's, but I can't use it well.

I can't recommend a higher-end camera because I don't know anything about it.

I hope the above is helpful to you, and I wish you good luck!!

Sony is not very good, I went to Gome last time to buy a SLR, by the way I tried the tx-5, the quality of the photo is super rubbish, I recommend Panasonic fp7gk 16.1 million pixels, I'm ready to start.