In the current era, are people who are both dependent and playful moths of society?

For the lazy people in the countryside, I don't think to support him. Regardless of the state or entrepreneurs, charities or individuals, helping the lazy person is to make him more lazy, who has money today and spends all day drinking and gambling, and tomorrow he has no money and reaches out to you. The bottomless abyss can be filled, and the mouth of the lazy person can never be filled!

A series of preferential poverty alleviation policies also make some lazy people seem to see "business opportunities": they are proud of poverty, but they are content to enjoy preferential policies, and lose the motivation to get rid of poverty and become rich! And psychologically, it is also getting stronger:

If I am poor and I am justified, the country will take care of me! What's more, some unreasonable demands have been put forward, and according to the state's current policy on groups in difficulty in rural areas, support is given to those who are covered by the Five Guarantees, the Subsistence Allowance Households, the Poor Households, and the Disabled. For these low-income groups and groups in difficulty, the state has set different standards, and all of them have been verified by the relevant departments to meet this standard.

The country will definitely go well on the road of poverty alleviation, and poverty alleviation is to let those who are truly poor get rid of poverty.

Should the state support the lazy people? If you don't help it, let it develop freely, and in the end, I don't know how far he will go? If you want to help, it will make many diligent people feel uncomfortable.

This issue is actually very contradictory to deal with. Now there are some people in the countryside, who are healthy and eat the bottom of the household, and I heard that there are 5,000 people all year round, and the whole family has about 20,000 from parents and children; Heng is subsidized and supported by the state, and he himself is lazy, so he has such superior conditions.

In order for the people of the whole country to live a happy and well-off life, the state has always adhered to the principle of not abandoning or abandoning any poor household. At the same time, the state has also invested huge human and financial resources in poverty alleviation. For example, we require that the daily necessities of poor households be met.

** Support and encouragement should be given in an appropriate and timely manner to help them gradually embark on the road to self-reliance and prosperity. The potential of changing their thinking and stimulating their creativity is huge and lasting, and it is an indispensable part of the overall work of poverty alleviation and prosperity in rural areas.

This is indeed the case, no matter what era it is, because it is lazy and playful, it will not cause any construction to society, it will not contribute anything to society, and it will drag down parents and society.

Indeed, because in today's society, if you don't work hard, you will lose a lot, and now life is very stressful, and they don't have the slightest achievement and effort.

Personally, I think that in the current era, people who are playful are not moths of society. They will be like this because they have been hurt a lot, and they have worked hard in the past, and it is only occasionally that they encounter some unsatisfactory things in their lives, which will cause them to be like this.