The stepfather slashed the stepdaughter with a kitchen knife, the stepfather committed suicide, and

This can be compensated. Because they are not related by blood at all, if the gang is dismantled. Two people must also live well to compensate each other.

Yes, this is no problem, as long as his father has property in his name, he can be sued.

Of course, it would be nice if he could be compensated, but his stepfather is no longer there, so there should be no one to make up for him.

You can go to the Evidence Bureau to apply for relevant emergencies.

In this case, of course, it is not possible to appeal and get compensation, because after all, it is said that it is a family, unless it is said that you later separated and are no longer a family.

I wonder who you can sue now, because your skin has killed itself, and no one will compensate you if you are suing.

It's already dead, and there's no need for it. Because the indemnifier is no longer there.

If the stepfather slashes the stepmother with a kitchen knife and the stepfather commits suicide, can the stepmother be compensated for her lawsuit? This one must not be compensated, he has passed away, and he will definitely not come.

If the stepfather dies and the mother does not have a marriage certificate, is the stepdaughter entitled to share the compensation?

Hello dear. The stepfather died and Yu Duan's mother did not pull the marriage certificate, and the stepdaughter has no right to share the compensation. Because the two are not married, then the stepdaughter and the stepfather have nothing to do with each other.

Legal basis: Article 1127 of the Civil Code The inheritance of inheritance shall be in the following order: (1) First order:

spouse, children, parents; (2) Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents. After the inheritance of Huaichun begins, it will be inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs will not inherit; If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

For the purposes of this Part, the term "children" includes legitimate children, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and dependent stepchildren. The term "parents" in this Part includes biological parents, adoptive parents, and step-parents who have a dependent relationship. The term "siblings" as used in this Part includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

The compensation is as follows:

In accordance with the relevant laws and regulations. Where the victim dies, the compensation obligor shall, in addition to compensating the relevant expenses provided for in the first paragraph of this article on the basis of the circumstances of the rescue, also compensate for the funeral expenses, the living expenses of the dependents, the death compensation expenses, and other reasonable expenses such as transportation expenses, lodging expenses, and lost work expenses incurred by the victim's relatives in handling funeral matters.

Compensation refers to the payment and compensation in all forms to individuals or groups whose legitimate rights and interests have been infringed. Compensation is a compensatory measure for the victim, in order to try to undo the accident that has already occurred, so as not to allow the bad situation to spread and have worse consequences.

Recently, there was a ** incident in a family in Qingpu District, Shanghai, the perpetrator and the victim were father and son, and the reason why the son wanted to hurt his father with a knife was because the father wanted to divide part of the family's settlement fee to his stepmother, and the two sides moved under the fierce quarrel, and the son waved the knife at his father, but the son did not really want to kill his father, and he did not know that his father would die because of this knife, so the court only ruled that the son was guilty of intentional injury, not intentional homide, This verdict has also been questioned by many netizens.

First of all, this bloody case was caused by a demolition fee, the son was dissatisfied with his father to share the demolition fee to his stepmother, so he repeatedly spoke out to obstruct his father, but the father was determined to give his stepmother a sum of money, and the son was angry and ruthless to his father, but at that time the son slashed his father, and then left, he didn't know that this knife actually cost his father his life.

However, even if the son did not intentionally kill the father, he took the initiative to harm the father, and the fact that the father died already exists, so the son should also be punished.

Secondly, back to the story itself, because many details have not been announced, we can only speculate on the general situation. If the demolished house actually belonged to the father before his second marriage, then this fee has nothing to do with the second wife, and theoretically there is no need to share it with her. Moreover, the family has a share in the demolition of the house, and if the son or the son's biological mother's share is damaged because the father gives it to the stepmother, then the son has the right to obstruct it, otherwise he has no right to interfere with the father's distribution.

In the end, according to people familiar with the matter, the son probably didn't want his stepmother to get this large amount of money, after all, his father would be his money a hundred years later, so the son was actually more selfish in doing this, and he also caused a death because of selfishness.

Slashing is a criminal offense, and intentional injury is criminally liable and generally carries a prison sentence.

Stepfather breaks the law.

If the stepfather says that he took the kitchen knife just to scare the stepfather, and at the same time no one presents other evidence to refute the stepfather's claims. Then the stepfather is threatening, intimidating, threatening the personal safety of others, which is a crime, and if the stepfather is a minor, then the stepfather's behavior is even more serious. However, although he broke the law, he did not commit a crime.

If it can't be proved that the stepfather took the kitchen knife as a threat under the condition of being able to control himself, it will be more serious, and it is necessary to restore and characterize the scene at that time based on various verifications.

If together before February 92.

It is a de facto marriage and can be inherited.

Subsequent cohabitation is an illegal cohabitation and there is no right of inheritance.

Interpretation 1 of the Marriage Law.

Article 5: Where a man and a woman who have not completed marriage registration in accordance with article 8 of the Marriage Law and live together in the name of husband and wife, and file a lawsuit with the people's court for divorce, they shall be treated differently:

1) Before the promulgation and implementation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs' "Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration" on February 1, 1994, where both the man and the woman had met the substantive requirements for marriage, it was to be handled as a de facto marriage;

2) After the promulgation and implementation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs' "Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration" on February 1, 1994, where both the man and the woman meet the substantive requirements for marriage, the people's court shall inform them to make up the marriage registration before accepting the case; If the marriage registration is not completed, it shall be handled as the dissolution of the cohabitation relationship.

There should be no, the law is evidence-based, how can you prove the relationship without a marriage certificate?

Stepchildren have the same obligation to support the elderly, as well as the right to inheritance, in the same way as legitimate children.

1. It can be inherited.

2. According to Article 10 of the Inheritance Law, the estate shall be inherited in the following order:

First order: spouse, children, parents.

Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not. If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

The term "children" in this Act includes legitimate children, illegitimate children, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

The term "parents" in this Act includes biological parents, adoptive parents and dependent stepparents.

The term "brothers and sisters" in this Law includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

According to the law, if your stepmother has no children, you can inherit, but if your stepmother has children, you become a second heir.

Yes, it can be inherited. The key depends on the distribution plan of the court's decision.