How to understand that a weak country has no diplomacy, and a weak country has no diplomacy, who sai

"Weak countries have no diplomacy" is an important principle, which does not mean that weak countries cannot establish diplomatic relations with other countries, but that they do not play an important role in foreign affairs. During the Kuomintang period, the first chief Jiang Tinghuang spoke English very well and spoke confidently, but no one listened. Japan's long English is very lame and rude, and everyone is very concerned.

Roosevelt admired Chiang Tinghuang very much and said to him: "You speak English very well and speak very reasonably, but your country is too poor and weak, and a weak country has no diplomacy." ”

There is a relationship of interest between countries. The weak country has little power to contain the strong.

The country is weak and bullied everywhere, and there is no equal status.

For example, at the Paris Peace Conference, China at the time embodied this article.

Countries that are incapable have no status.

Not qualified to speak.

The opportunity to get acquainted with Bismarck, the greatest diplomat in German history, was everything.

Weak countries without diplomacy means that a country itself is not strong, its international status is too low, it cannot be valued by other countries, and it is difficult to establish equal diplomatic relations with other countries. Even if the diplomats of this country speak English very well and speak with confidence, they cannot be taken seriously by other state personnel. And it is precisely because weak countries are not valued in the international community, such as China, which is in a feudal society, can only be a closed and closed country.

On the one hand, radicals and advanced scholars who actively seek to learn from Western countries cannot elevate China's status internationally and attract the attention and promotion of Western powers. On the other hand, China's leadership will also be relentless or reluctant to engage in economic dealings with Western powers. If this continues, the country will be poorer and weaker.

It is difficult for the economy to be in line with international standards. It can be said that the lack of diplomacy in a weak country has many adverse effects on the economy of a "weak country."

I don't know if you're satisfied with my answer?

I feel that you should have your own ideas and can write them.

Weak countries have no diplomacy, as Lu Zhengxiang, the first generation of career diplomats in China, said.

This sentence means that a country with weak national strength has no say in diplomacy with other countries and in handling international affairs, and cannot play a role in foreign affairs.

The generation of the phrase "no diplomacy in a weak country":

In 1919, Lu Zhengxiang led Gu Weijun and others to represent China at the Paris Peace Conference to discuss the handling of the defeated countries by the victorious countries in World War I.

At the meeting, the Chinese delegation refused to sign the treaty, even though China was the victorious country at the time, but it was still confronted with the Shandong issue, and that China, as the victorious power, was supposed to take back the area of Shandong occupied by Germany, but the Western countries wanted to divide it to Japan.

In this diplomatic incident, China participated in the conference as a victorious country, but was treated by a defeated country, which fully illustrates the saying that "a weak country has no diplomacy".

1. Weak countries have no diplomacy: It means that developed countries do not expect to gain benefits by establishing diplomatic relations with weak countries, and if their national strength is too weak, they will be underground and unable to sit on an equal footing with strong countries, let alone have equal exchanges with foreign countries.

2. The foreign policy pursued by the imperialist powers is a policy of strength, and semi-colonial China has no diplomatic independence.

3. For example, China was one of the victorious powers of the Entente, but the Paris Peace Conference ignored China's legitimate rights and interests and transferred all the privileges of Germany in Shandong to Japan, and China was a party to the Washington Conference, but was forced to sign the "Nine-Power Pact" that opened the door to all imperialist countries, so that China was once again under the joint domination of several imperialist countries, and it showed that a weak country has no diplomacy.

4. For example, in 1900, the British, American, German, French, Russian, Japanese, Italian, and Austrian allied forces burned, killed, and plundered China, and in September 1901, the Qing Dynasty was forced to sign the "Xinchou Treaty" that humiliated the country, and on September 18, 1938, Japan launched an eight-year chain of aggression against China.