How to write a paper analysis How to write a paper analysis in English

Creative ideas:

The paper analysis of the language is to sum up the lessons and lessons and find out the deficiencies so as to facilitate the re-fighting. Its steps can generally be printed as; Analyze each topic one by one, but this right does not mean that it is exhaustive, but that the topics are categorized;

Basics; It includes a few questions to a few questions, including -- words, etc., to summarize where you have mastered well, better, and what are still lacking. (Give examples to illustrate).

Body:

1. Pay attention to the examination of basic knowledge. The test paper can fully reflect the proposition principle of testing students' basic knowledge as the main goal, adhere to the textbook, but avoid the mechanical knowledge in the textbook, and focus on the basic knowledge that some students must master, so the mastery of these language knowledge can better lay a solid foundation for future learning.

2. Highlight the communicative ability of language. As a language, English is a communicative tool, and the teaching of English in primary schools is based on the age characteristics of students and the rules of language learning, and the main goal is to establish the cultivation of listening and speaking ability, and the principle of reading and writing to keep up. Therefore, the whole examination has increased the test of listening and speaking ability.

3. Infiltrate the requirements of ability assessment. Learning a language is for communicating. Primary school English teaching should not only teach students some basic language knowledge, but also teach students how to use language and cultivate their ability to use language.

You can first indicate your score in the essay, and then write whether you are satisfied with the score or not, and analyze the mistakes on the test: whether it was sloppy or really not. After writing the analysis of the wrong questions, it is OK to write a little bit about your goals for the next semester's exam.

I don't know how you meditate, but that's what I wrote. Hee-hee!

1. Analyze the volume.

2 review stage, experience.

3. Test-taking skills.

4 future goals.

Write the structure of the test questions, the distribution of knowledge points, and the analysis of the answer sheets (the good aspects of the students and the bad aspects of the students), focusing on finding out the loopholes in the students' knowledge mastery; Performance Analysis: Find out the differences.

How do you write a post-exam paper analysis?

Summarize lessons learned, find out shortcomings, and analyze them topic by question.

Roll analysis of English 500 words, urgent! Urgent! Urgent!

The mistake is** overall summary how it is written.

Ah, think about it, think about it, it's okay, it's stuck in it, think about Subaru's control, it's coming, it's coming, it's coming, it's coming back, it's pathological.

The content of volume analysis and writing includes the analysis of the difficulty of the whole volume, the hierarchical analysis of difficulty, the analysis of knowledge structure, the analysis of question type scores, the analysis of proposition quality, and the analysis of relevance.

Difficulty analysis of the whole volume: understand the difficulty grasp, dispersion degree, score segment distribution, and test question score distribution.

Hierarchical analysis of difficulty: Through the analysis of the scores of "easy questions", "slightly difficult questions" and "more difficult questions", we can understand the problems of grasping the learning situation and whether the teaching positioning is accurate.

Analysis of the structure of knowledge hunger: Through the analysis of the score of the knowledge section, the mastery structure of the knowledge section and the achievement of teaching goals are understood.

Question type score analysis: Understand the level of problem-solving ability of "multiple-choice", "fill-in-the-blank", "answer" and other question types.

Proposition Quality Analysis: Examine the differentiation of test questions, understand the quality of test questions and the reliability level of test results.

Precautions for answering the questionnaire

1. Review the meaning of the question and answer the question carefully.

Before doing the questions, candidates should first carefully review the questions, clarify the requirements of the questions, and avoid blindly answering the questions. The content of the examination includes: to see the specific requirements of the question type and the question, and also to review the information provided by the question.

Especially in the liberal arts exam, whether you can accurately find the required information from the reading materials, interpret it reasonably, make bold guesses, and repeatedly scrutinize the meaning of words and sentences is often the key to answering the questions correctly.

2. Standardize the answers and keep the paper neat and tidy.

Candidates should adhere to standardized expressions and use the language of textbooks when answering questions. Unclear handwriting, untidy, non-standard expression, and incomplete are the reasons for unnecessary loss of points. Therefore, during the examination, the handwriting should be neat, the hierarchy should be clear, the graphics should be accurate, the reasoning should be precise, the answers should be concise, and the paper should be kept neat and tidy.

1. Lexical analysis.

The impact of vocabulary on the reading ability of English test papers can be pointed out by showing the problem of reading in the field of reading. For example, limited vocabulary leads to slow reading speed, semantic comprehension bias, errors, and incomprehension. There is also a lack of expression due to a small vocabulary in writing.

2. Grammatical analysis.

At present, the weight of multiple-choice questions has been generally reduced in the English test papers of the college entrance examination, and the grammatical ability is prominently reflected in the correction of mistakes and written expression questions. These two topics are designed to examine comprehensive language judgment and expression skills. Therefore, I would like to make suggestions for grammar learning based on these two topics, and give feedback after the usual grammar training.

The best way to acquire grammatical knowledge is to familiarize yourself with sentences with good context and consciously use grammatical knowledge.

3. Analysis of writing.

From the perspective of writing skills, the English test paper puts forward three main problems that students have: sloppy handwriting, untidy writing or oversimplified sentences, such as poor penago and weak language content, and grammatical errors to make matters worse, such an essay will not get a high score. or the abuse of conjunctions, adverbs, conjunctions, commentaries, etc.

Fourth, the analysis of question types.

From listening, reading, cloze in the blanks, grammar fill in the blanks, and essay correction, the specific English test papers are analyzed and some feasible suggestions are put forward to the students.

In the process of learning, reflection is very important and necessary. Reflection is a dialogue between oneself and oneself. Such conversations may be subliminal and may manifest themselves verbally, preferably in writing, such as the method of paper analysis after an exam as follows:

1. From topic-by-topic analysis to overall analysis.

Starting from the analysis of each specific problem, analyze the reasons for the error's knowledge, ability, and problem-solving habits. Roll pure.

1. What are the knowledge points examined in this quivering search question?

2. What is the content of the knowledge points?

3. How does this problem use this knowledge to solve the problem?

4. What is the process of dissolving this question?

5. Is there any other way to do this question? On this basis, we can conduct a holistic analysis and come up with an overall conclusion. Taking science as an example, there are three main reasons for losing points, namely, unclear knowledge, unclear problem scenarios and unclear expressions.

2. From numerical analysis to qualitative analysis.

1) The number of points lost for each reason. If you make a calculation error, you will lose points; Unclear questions and loss of marks; Poor consideration loses points; Formula notes mistakes and loses points; Unclear concepts, loss of points, and so on.

2) Take the 5-10 points that should not be lost. In subsequent studies, it is expected that you will try to retrieve these scores. If you really do this, then the different disciplines will add up and make considerable progress.

3) Wherever points are lost, there is inevitability as well as chance. It is suggested that students who can learn can see both the phenomenon and the essence, and he can use his own analysis to say: What is the essence of losing points?

3. From oral analysis to written analysis.

Reflection is necessary in the learning process. Reflection is a dialogue between oneself and oneself. Such conversations may be subconscious, may manifest themselves verbally, preferably in writing.

Fourth, from attribution analysis to countermeasure analysis.

Phenomenon analysis, attribution analysis and countermeasure analysis are progressive analysis, with phenomenon analysis as the foundation, attribution analysis as the bridge, and countermeasure analysis as the goal.

The mathematical paper analysis is written as follows:

1. From the perspective of the volume, it can be roughly divided into two categories, the first category is the basic knowledge, through filling in the blanks, judging the blind judgment of the shed mountain, selection, oral arithmetic, column vertical calculation and drawing, and the detection of operation problems. The second category is comprehensive application, which is mainly an application practice test.

2. The basic testing of students is as follows: Overall, students can play their actual level in the test, with a pass rate of more than 96% and an excellent rate of about 55%.

3. Teaching suggestions.

Pay attention to the process and guide the best innovation. Mathematics teaching should not only enable students to acquire basic knowledge and basic skills, but also focus on guiding students to explore independently and cultivate the ability to consciously discover new knowledge and laws. In this way, students can not only have a deep understanding of knowledge, but also let students learn the scientific method of exploration in the process of exploration.

Let students learn not only for what it is, but also for why it is so.

Methods of Analysis of Mathematics Test Papers

The first chapter is the theoretical basis of "Methods for Analysis of Mathematics Test Papers", which consists of three sections, mainly introducing the basic content of the classical true fraction theory, the advantages and limitations of the chain, and the problems that should be paid attention to when applying. Basic knowledge of educational tests; Basic knowledge of educational statistics. An introduction to the generalization theory and the question response theory is available in the appendix.

Chapter 2 introduces the proposition quality analysis in the analysis of test papers, and analyzes the four basic technical indicators (reliability, validity, difficulty, and discrimination) in detail based on specific cases.