-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Categories: Social Livelihood >> Law.
Problem description: In June 2004, in order to meet the large demand of the summer cold drink market, Dexing Supermarket needed to buy a batch of Coca-Cola every week to make up for the shortage of supermarket supply. However, the supermarket has limited manpower, and it is impossible to hire new employees in a short time, so under the introduction of acquaintances, I found Wang who drove a van, and the two parties agreed that Wang only needed to go to the cold drink market every Friday afternoon to transport 50 boxes of Coca-Cola back for Dexing Supermarket, and Dexing Supermarket paid him according to the standard of 2 yuan per box. After the negotiation, Wang kept the agreement and delivered the goods back every Friday according to the needs of the supermarket.
One day, Wang temporarily had something to do and couldn't transport goods for the supermarket for a month, and this month happened to be the time when cold drinks were selling well, so Wang found Li before leaving, handed over his van to Li, and asked him to deliver goods to the supermarket every Friday afternoon, and go out to pick up work and run transportation at other times, and then pay him 500 yuan a month. Who knows, Li suffered a car accident and died on the way to deliver goods for Dexing Supermarket for the second time. The vehicle involved in the accident escaped, and no whereabouts were found.
As a result, Li's family asked Wang and the owner of Dexing Supermarket to jointly compensate for the losses caused by Li's death, and a dispute arose between the two parties.
Questions: 1) In this case, with whom did Wang, who drove the van, form a legal relationship? What legal relationship is formed and why?
2) With whom did Li form a legal relationship after being involved in a car accident? What legal relationship is formed and why?
3) Is it reasonable for Li's family to demand that Wang and the owner of Dexing Supermarket jointly compensate for the losses caused by Li's death? Who should be held liable? What are the legal remedies available?
Analysis: 1) Wang formed a legal relationship with the supermarket and formed a entrusted legal relationship, because he transported 50 boxes of Coca-Cola for Dexing Supermarket, and Dexing Supermarket paid him labor fees, and Brother Ran Jing met the entrusted legal relationship.
2) Li and Wang formed an entrustment relationship, and formed a tort legal relationship with the car that caused the accident.
3) Unreasonable. The car that caused the accident should be held liable for compensation. Li's family should report the case as soon as possible, pursue the criminal liability of the car that caused the accident, and claim civil compensation incidentally.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05Categories: Social Livelihood >> Law.
Problem description: A sells a batch of goods to B to eliminate collisions, and C transports them to B for acceptance (this batch of goods is owned by Zhang San), and when the goods are transported to B, B has moved to other places, and C continues to transport the goods to B's new residence, and the goods are destroyed on the way due to the collision between car C and car D, and both parties are negligent.
Q: How many civil legal relationships are involved in this dispute?
Analysis: A B Legal Relationship of Sale of Goods A C Legal Relationship of Cargo Consignment C D Legal Relationship of Traffic Accidents.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04Summary. There are many kinds of legal relationships, criminal, civil, and administrative legal relationships, which one do you want? I have a case of civil legal relationship here, and the landlord will see if it meets your requirements: a brief summary of the case.
In 1982, villager A obtained a self-reserved mountain from his villager group B. A passed away in 1984, and A had two daughters. In 1985, without the consent of A's two daughters, villager group B reassigned a certain self-reserved mountain of villager A to villager C of villager group B.
In 2005, Ding, a villager of villager group B, requested that the rights of A's self-reserved mountain farm be confirmed for management and use on the grounds that A and D had already formed an adoptive relationship and had the right to inherit A's rights and interests in the self-retained mountain. A's two daughters admit that A and D have formed an adoptive relationship, and at the same time explicitly renounce their rights to A's self-retained mountain farm. City ** awarded the management and use right of the disputed mountain farm to D on the grounds that A and D had formed an adoptive relationship, that B had redistributed a certain self-reserved mountain of the original A to villager C in the village without the consent of A's two daughters and D, and that A's two daughters had voluntarily given up A's original rights and interests in a self-retained mountain farm.
Cases concerning legal relationships Kneel and beg.
Hello, I'll check the information and come back in a moment.
There are many kinds of legal related jujube systems, criminal, civil, and administrative legal relationships, which one do you want? I have a case of civil legal relationship here, and the landlord will see if it meets your requirements: Case Introduction: In 1982, villager A obtained a certain self-reserved mountain from his villager group B.
A passed away in 1984, and A had two daughters. In 1985, without the consent of A's two daughters, villager group B demolished a certain cluster of A from Liushan and redistributed it to villager C of villager group B. In 2005, Ding, a villager of villager group B, requested that the rights of A's self-reserved mountain farm be confirmed for management and use on the grounds that A and D had already formed an adoptive relationship and had the right to inherit A's rights and interests in the self-retained mountain.
A's two daughters admit that A and D have formed an adoptive relationship, and at the same time explicitly renounce their rights to A's self-retained mountain farm. City ** awarded the management and use right of the disputed mountain farm to D on the grounds that A and D had formed an adoptive relationship, that B had redistributed a self-retained mountain to villager C in the village without the consent of A's two daughters and D, and that A's two daughters had voluntarily given up A's original rights and interests in a self-retained mountain and mountain ear farm.
At the stage of administrative litigation in the case, the People's Court revoked the administrative ruling of People's ** on the grounds that the right to confirm whether the adoption relationship was established and its validity was confirmed by Liang Xiangyu in the People's Court, and that the people's recognition of the adoption relationship between A and D exceeded the scope of administrative authority, and required the people's ** to deal with it again.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-031. There is a civil legal relationship between Teng and the woman who committed suicide without cause. 2. The woman should be reimbursed for the damage to the camera as well as the cost of his own wounds, because he suffered the loss for her benefit. 3. Teng can request reimbursement for the medical expenses and other expenses paid by the woman.
Because he suffered the loss for her benefit. 4. The 100 yuan that Teng borrowed from the waiter should be repaid by Teng. Because this is another legal relationship, Teng's loss can be recovered from the beneficiary.
5, Teng cannot ask the woman to pay a certain amount of remuneration. Because his behavior is an act of righteousness and courage, not as prescribed by law or contract, it is an act of management without cause, and he cannot be rewarded. 6. Teng should not compensate for the loss of the woman's clothes. Same reason as above.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-021. There is a legal relationship of management without cause. Causal management refers to a party that has no statutory or contractual obligation to seek benefits for others, but has no statutory contractual obligation to manage things for others. 2. Compensation should be made.
The woman has a debt of management without cause to Teng 3, yes, and it is also a debt of management without cause 4, and Teng repays. This is his own borrowing behavior5, it cannot be requested, it belongs to management without cause, and the manager's right to claim for himself is limited to the compensation of necessary management expenses, and there is no right to claim remuneration6. It should not be, because the management act is a spontaneous act, and the manager has the obligation to manage it appropriately, and the legitimate rights and interests of the management actor without cause should be protected in a timely manner.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-01One, bai
It is legal to buy shampoo, and the prize money goes to his son du. Article 12 Minors over the age of 10 are restricted.
A person with civil capacity may be allowed to carry out civil activities appropriate to his age and intelligence; Other civil activities shall be carried out by his legal **person**, or with the consent of his legal **person.
Second, if it is not legal, you can request a return for the same reason.
Third, it is illegal. Article 18: Guardians shall perform guardianship duties, protect the ward's person, property, and other lawful rights and interests, and must not dispose of the ward's property except for the ward's interests.
Fourth, the sales contract with the shopping mall, and your guardianship.
1.A and B met on the train, and A was afraid that he would not wake up when he arrived at the station, so he asked B to wake him up at station A and get off the train, and B readily agreed. When the train arrives at station A, A is asleep and B is not awake. >>>More
You need to state the specific problem in detail.
When did you buy this house, if your parents bought it after marriage, it is the joint property of your parents, if your parents are divorced, because your father is at fault, you can divide more property, as for the loan you said, then it is also the joint debt of your parents, and you can ask your father to bear half of the loan amount that he should bear. If your parents bought the house before marriage, it is your father's own property, and you can only ask him for the part of the loan that he should bear. In the case of divorce, your parents divide the joint property, and there will be no question of the illegitimate child, but if your father dies, the issue of inheritance will be related to the illegitimate child. >>>More
First of all, you calm down your mood first, you are so angry because you are sharing a house for the first time, you don't have to mind I can tell you responsibly that you are not so unlucky Only you will meet such a person and you are also a classmate, I am also a girl who graduated for two years Or share a house with my college roommate, this relationship is good, but after sharing a house Because of the difference in living habits, I am quite unhappy, and the relationship is stiff and embarrassing And 70% of the people around me who share a house like this are like this, and in the end they all change houses or rent them themselves, When we first shared a house together, we all thought that it was better to know each other and talk than to share a house with someone I didn't know, but it was wrong! I hope you consider everyone's own living habits, everyone has a different way of being born Some like to be quiet Some like to be lively Some are clean Some are sloppy and can't do things, we can't avoid some adults when we live with our families, not to mention with classmates, they are doing immoral This is also related to the quality of people's tutoring I suggest that you don't have to do so absolutely If you sue them and take this out of the matter Everyone will say that those two people are not very good and have no quality But they will say that you are too bad It's all classmates, who will be friends with you in the future, and if you make some mistakes, you have to be so serious. What do you think. >>>More
infringement of the right of reproduction under copyright law; Public schools do not have the problem of tax evasion, and administrative penalties can be imposed.