Kneel down and beg the heroes to solve a historical problem and explain the reason

Choose C, reason: A is difficult to spread as the answer says, but the question stem says that it has contributed to the production of Chinese and Western clothing, since there is integration, how can it be said that it is difficult to spread? b The same is true, since there is a phenomenon of combining Chinese and Western cultures, it shows that the progress of the times, people's vision, and thinking have also changed.

With the integration of Eastern and Western cultures and the vigorous promotion of the first at that time, people's aesthetics have changed, and the change of clothing is one of its important manifestations. D's answer seems to be right, but if you think about it, how can it be right if the question stem refers to cultural changes, while D answers are about the economy?

It should be C, A, I'm afraid it can't be the reason, although clothing is a kind of civilization, but it can't represent the spread of civilization. In fact, many places have been westernized now. I don't see anything special, the simplest thing is where we live now, which is the western-style building.

Isn't this a form of Westernization?

And B is even more speechless, although the dress was expensive at that time, but is there no poor person in the West? What does this clothing have to do with the smallholder economy?

As for D, this one is even more speechless. What does clothing have to do with capitalism? Let's take a representative as an example, Japan, what kind of doctrine is it now?

Capitalism, but many of them still wear kimonos, which are actually hanfu. When was Hanfu made? In the feudal era, clothes could not represent a civilization or ism.

And c is more appropriate, but I personally think that this should be the 5,000-year-old heritage of Chinese civilization that makes it difficult for people to adapt to this world trend for a while, and in the end it is nothing more than extremes, or integration. And now it's become a fusion, so people's perceptions have naturally changed. After all, it takes time to change the concept, you can't eat light food today and greasy food immediately tomorrow, then you will definitely have a stomachache tomorrow.

There is a process of adaptation.

Four d. I've done this question, a simulation of a place in Guangdong. Costumes represent advanced Western culture. In addition, during the National ** period, China's small peasants had already disintegrated.

d. The economic base determines the superstructure.

1. I know how your teacher analyzes this problem in class, if I say, this problem method is the elimination method. CDs are easier to get rid of in the first place. Let's take a look at the two AB options.

2."Regional integration" does not clearly say whether it is economic or political, and what is commonly known as regional economic integration is also known as regional economic blocing. A regional economic bloc refers to a regional economic cooperation organization established through a series of agreements and treaties within a certain region and a number of countries that are geographically close to each other.

When you are in class, teachers usually use two words, one is "economic globalization". The other is "regional economic blocing". You are asking about regional integration, which is easy to be ambiguous and easy to misunderstand as political integration.

At best, it's economic cooperation, so you can rule it out.

3. Your question is first of all ambiguous. If you ask about political integration. No organization can push it, except for a country.

International organizations composed of different countries cannot be politically integrated. If you ask about the integration of the economy. In the lesson on regional economic grouping, all the organizations mentioned in our textbook are correct, such as APEC.

North American Free Zone**. European Union. Wait a minute.

Hope it helps.

Teacher Xiaocao.