Whether Yongzheng s throne is really a usurpation 30

Updated on history 2024-02-09
28 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Yongzheng's throne is above board, for several reasons: First: Emperor Kangxi has always been more optimistic about his fourth son, that is, Yongzheng, and he also likes this son very much.

    The reason is that Kangxi only called Yongzheng to his sickbed before he died. Second: Many people say that Emperor Kangxi's edict is written to pass on the throne of the fourteenth son, but let's look back at the fourteenth prince, this brother of Yongzheng's mother, he is very capable of fighting, and has the ability to command the army, but the emperor's position is not only to command the army, it can be said to be all-powerful, Yongzheng has been in charge of the household department when he was the prince, it can be said that Kangxi really cultivated only Yongzheng and the eighth prince Yinji, because the eighth prince also manages the ministry, The other princes don't have this treatment, so the heirs to the throne should also be limited to the eighth prince Yinji and Yongzheng, how can they pass on the throne to the fourteenth prince.

    Third: Kangxi's edict of succession was written in both Manchu and Chinese languages, and if the Chinese edict was easy to tamper with, the Manchu edict would not be easy to change. Therefore, to sum up, Yongzheng's throne must be the last wish of Emperor Kangxi, and there is no possibility of fraud.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In the last years of Kangxi, he competed with other princes for the prince. After the death of the Holy Ancestor, he succeeded to the throne with the help of the Thirteenth Emperor Yinxiang. It is also rumored that with the help of Long Keduo, he seized the throne given by the Fuyuan general Yinyu.

    Whether Yongzheng's succession to the throne was passed down by Kangxi or tampered with the edict to seize the heir is a controversial issue that has not yet been determined. However, most historians judge that Kangxi's edict was written in Manchu, Chinese, and Mongolian. According to the folk saying, the Chinese language was modified, but the Mongolian and Manchu languages could not be modified.

    Moreover, the folklore is that the fourteen princes were passed on to the throne, which was changed by Long Keduo to the four princes, but according to the rules of official document writing in the Qing Dynasty, there is no name for the four princes and fourteen princes, but the fourth son of the emperor and the fourteenth son of the emperor. To date, there are about 10 million Qing Dynasty documents in the Forbidden City, and there are no exceptions. In ancient times, the word was only used as a person's name, and the place should be passed down to "Yu", from the analysis of writing habits and content, folklore can basically be sure of rumors.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    No, because Yongzheng offended too many people during his reign, everyone spread that Yongzheng was rebellious or something.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    History must be judged! In fact, Yongzheng's throne was replaced normally.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Kangxi hesitated between choosing Yinzhen and the fourteenth elder brother, and he didn't know who was better to choose.

    In the end, the choice was made because Fang Bao said "Viewing the Holy Sun".

    Whether Emperor Yongzheng was a usurper or not, there are different theories!

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    No, because the edict was written in Manchu, there was no "Fourteen Princes" and "Four Princes" and "Yu and Ten", and the book could not be rewritten.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    In history, Yongzheng was not a usurper. The incident of the nine sons seizing the heir in the last years of Kangxi almost led to a bloody palace coup, and later Kangxi's edict was publicly unveiled, which clearly stated that Prince Yong, the fourth prince, was not a usurper.

    Yongzheng related introductionYongzheng reigned for 13 years and made a series of reforms to the Qing court institutions and officials. For example, in order to strengthen the rule over the ethnic minorities in the southwest, it is necessary to change the land and return it to the river, return the money consumed to the public, and establish a system of raising honest silver. In particular, in the seventh year of Yongzheng (1729), after sending troops to Qinghai and quelling the rebellion of Luobzang Danjin, in order to improve the efficiency of military affairs, a military aircraft office was set up in the Longzong Gate, which was a hundred steps away from the Yangxin Palace, which created a centralized power model that followed the emperor and queen to monopolize military and political affairs until the end of the Qing Dynasty.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    First, he looked at Qianlong and said: But it is not very credible, although he may fancy Qianlong, but I think he can't guarantee that Yongzheng will pass on the throne to Qianlong, second, it is to kill his father and seize the emperor, that is, to kill Kangxi, but I think it is impossible, how shrewd Kangxi is, Yongzheng has not many opportunities.

    Three. Robbed 14 elder brother said that the most widely circulated, the basis is that the transmission is located in the fourteenth son to the fourth son, but it is impossible to have the holy decree at that time, and the edict is written in Manchu and Chinese, and even in Gamon, etc., so it is unlikely.

    Fourth, Kangxi has no choice, among the princes who have the right to be emperors, the eldest and second have been abolished. The third is a literati, the eighth is from a low background, impossible, the old nine and the old ten are mainly the eighth, the thirteenth was imprisoned at that time (Yongzheng was released as the emperor), the fourteenth was at the border, and he was afraid of changes if he came back late. So I can only choose Yongzheng.

    Personal opinion.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The posthumous Zhao was not tampered with, and Yongzheng rightfully succeeded to the throne.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Whether Emperor Yongzheng usurped the throne or not has been debated for hundreds of years, and the mystery has finally been revealed.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The usurpation does not exist, it should be to seize the throne, after Kangxi's death, many princes did not accept Yongzheng, only the thirteenth elder brother supported him, and the thirteenth elder brother helped him deal with the eighth and ninth children.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    LZ is not watching too many time travel dramas. The history of the Qing Dynasty is very concise, not as detailed as the history of other dynasties, so there are a lot of doubts, but I think the usurpation is unlikely.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    No, 1, if you tamper with the Chinese language, then how to change the Mongolian and Manchu languages? 2, in that era, the better Kangxi treated a person, the more jealousy of others would be, so if he wanted to protect Yongzheng, he would definitely ignore him.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    I'm sure to tell you, no, and it can't be, the current TV series is a bit disrespectful to history... Moreover, there is a rumor that it is rumored that it is located in the fourteenth elder brother, they say that someone changed ten to Yu, do you think, the ancient characters are the same as the modern ones? It's impossible to change.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Of course, it's not true, that is, Kangxi is optimistic about Qianlong, and in the first year of Yongzheng, he set up a secret edict to let Qianlong succeed to the throne.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    A: To be precise, it's a mystery, and no one can say yes or no, because everything is speculation anyway, just like the cause of his death. There is a theory that Emperor Kangxi's succession is related to Emperor Qianlong.

    It is said that Emperor Kangxi was not optimistic about Emperor Yongzheng at that time, but because he particularly liked Hongli (the fourth son of Yongzheng), he passed on the throne to him. Personally, I am more in favor of this view.

    As for usurping the throne or not, try to think about Emperor Yongzheng in the best way.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Not a usurper! Before Yongzheng ascended the throne, Kangxi did not set up a "storage position", so what position can Yongzheng usurp? ?

    Tang Taizong launched the "Xuanwumen Change" to kill the prince and usurp the position of his brother! Zhu Di, the king of Yan, launched the "Battle of Jingyan" and usurped the throne of his nephew Emperor Jianwen! This is called usurpation!

    There was no emperor before Yongzheng ascended the throne, so it cannot be said that Yongzheng's succession was a "usurpation"!

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    The posthumous Zhao was not tampered with, and Yongzheng rightfully succeeded to the throne.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Unlikely, because the official languages of the Qing Dynasty were Manchu and Chinese, it is impossible for the content of the edict to be changed.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Kangxi's edict of succession is still in the National Palace Museum in Taipei, and it is indeed for the fourth child! This is the most powerful proof! If you have time, you can travel and witness it!

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    It should be. These things are normal in Chinese history. As long as everyone sees your performance when you're in power, it's fine.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Actually, it's not, if you look at so many emperors in history, which one didn't play a little despicable means to get to the throne?

    And he is also in line with the trend of history, so he is also a generation of Ming Jun...

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Not all usurpers will change the name of the dynasty in general.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    There shouldn't be, it's better to watch this as a story, I believe it's okay.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    When pigs fly.

    When the emperor's edict of the Qing Dynasty mentioned the prince, the word "emperor" must be crowned in front of the "first son", so the "ten" in the edict cannot be changed to "yu", and it should literally be "yu". Moreover, the edict must have a full text, and the Manchu text is a pinyin script, and the characters cannot be modified.

    Why is it rumored that Yongzheng usurped the throne?

    There is a little-known reason, Kangxi took a fancy to Yinzhen (Yongzheng)'s second son Hongli (that is, Emperor Qianlong), Yongzheng can't let people know that he inherited the unification because of his son. So Yongzheng destroyed what could prove himself.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    No, Ye Shi said that Yongzheng tampered with the edict of the throne and added a horizontal to "pass on the fourteen sons" in the ten sons to "pass on the fourth son" This statement is not valid, first of all, this format is wrong, generally speaking, it should be ". . . The fourteenth son of the emperor... If you follow that statement, it becomes "...

    The throne of the emperor is passed on to the fourth son. . . The grammar is not clear, and more importantly, the Qing Dynasty's edict of succession has Manchu and Mongolian characters in addition to Chinese, and you can see the plaques of the palaces in the Forbidden City. And Yongzheng showed extraordinary talent in martial arts when he was the prince, the eighth son of the emperor paid more attention to internal affairs and strategy, and the fourteenth son of the emperor paid more attention to martial arts...

    Kangxi lived a long life, and he liked Hongli (Qianlong) the most among his grandchildren, so it was not ruled out that he would pass on the throne to Yongzheng in order to make Hongli emperor.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    It can't be said that the emperor is capable.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    People have usurped everything, and they can endure him.

Related questions
23 answers2024-02-09

Wei Chen shouldn't be able to act, even if he does, he shouldn't be the fifth elder brother, I personally think that it's good to find anyone, but you can't find Yu Haoming and this year's fast girl, it's just impossible to watch.

18 answers2024-02-09

There is indeed the sinking of the Titanic, but the protagonist's love story is fictional, but there are life and death partings that happen on the ship, but the director expresses the whole with the personal story of Jack and Rose, and that kind of story is the director's artistic interpretation, not real. The Star of the Sea is also available, but it is the second room of Queen Elizabeth of England, although it has been hehe.

8 answers2024-02-09

I think. 90 percent of the time, but some can't be ruled out. Matter is the basis of life. Without material security, how can we live a good life? Don't people like that? >>>More

6 answers2024-02-09

Others say that fate is in our own hands, but there are too few things we can decide, we can't change the joys and sorrows, we can't choose the background, I prefer to believe that fate is God's arrangement, but we can spend every day happily without regrets.

14 answers2024-02-09

It's just a rumor. No, no physical evidence – in short, it's like gossip news, gossip news from the scientific community. If there are really alien creatures or something inside, will scientists dare to dissect them? With their advanced technology, they have already pinched the earth to death as an ant......