Does burning wood for cooking in rural areas really pollute the environment?

I think there is also pollution to the environment, but the pollution is very small, negligible. Because the countryside is vast and sparsely populated, it is not polluted.

Farmers have been burning straw for thousands of years! In the past, farmers have been burning straw, and when the crops are harvested in the fall, the straw in the field burns with blue smoke! But for thousands of years, it has been blue water and blue sky. Without a trace of dirt, it is clear and transparent.

Is there environmental pollution associated with burning straw and cooking on fires in rural areas? Since Pangu opened the world, they have been cooking with firewood and straw. During the period of the People's Commune, the peasants cut grass, cut grass, burned soil and fertilizer, prepared for two years for spring planting.

This was encouraged (there was no nitrogen at the time). fertilizers such as ammonium and phosphate), and burning forests to expand arable land. In the countryside, especially in some secluded areas, it is very normal to cook with branches, and farmers use small cars to take home the discarded branches they have cut down from various fruit trees.

Then you can cook over a fire.

There are many causes of air pollution. On top of that, the city is under development and does not have strict environmental protection requirements for various pollution sources. Car exhaust fumes are emitted in large quantities at will, and all kinds of garbage, dead cats and dead dogs have not been thoroughly disposed of.

Indiscriminate mining of all kinds of minerals, forestry and wild resources. In the process of waiting for so many modern civilizations, the various pollution sources generated have not been completely changed, and the environment has been seriously polluted. Therefore, the most important thing is to manage pollution in the city, and I think the pollution in the rural areas is negligible.

It does pollute the air environment, because the smoke from burning wood is very unpleasant.

Burning wood for cooking rice in the countryside has a certain degree of environmental pollution, but it is not large.

The pollution of that environment is very large, so it is not recommended.

I don't think so, after all, this combustion is similar to natural gas.

Raised by experts. Here are the hazards of burning branches::1. Cooking fires emits harmful gases Experts believe that before burning the fire, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide will be emitted because of combustion, carbon monoxide will be produced if not fully burned, and carbon dioxide will be emitted if Huishi is fully burned, anyway, as long as it is burned, harmful gases will be emitted.

Carbon monoxide can easily poison farmers, and carbon dioxide can cause environmental pollution, so for the safety of farmers and the protection of the environment, farmers should be prohibited from burning firewood for cooking.

2. Over-harvesting of trees.

Experts say that from the perspective of forest protection, using electricity or gas instead of firewood can greatly reduce the felling of trees, so that the mountains will become greener, the water will be greener, and the sky will be bluer. If it is forbidden to burn fires for cooking, then no one will go up the mountain to cut firewood, the forest resource coverage rate will be higher, and the environment will become more and more beautiful, so in order to protect the forest, farmers should also be prohibited from burning firewood for cooking.

Farmers have always used firewood for cooking, but now they are not allowed to cook because cooking on fire is a waste of energy and will cause pollution, and because it is more troublesome to cook on fire, and now it is more convenient to cook with gas and gas.

Because cooking on a fire can easily lead to gas poisoning and the like, which is a great hidden danger to life, it is said that cooking on a fire is not allowed.

Because now there is a better way to cook, in the past, burning wood for cooking was not only troublesome, but also polluted the environment, but now with the gradual popularization of gas, no one goes to cook on the fire.

This is the case, but we also have to look at a more realistic problem: if you can't burn firewood, you can use electricity, and although there is not much gas, you don't know how much it accumulates over time, so who will bear the current expenses?

Mainly because now the state supports the protection of the environment, and now cooking on a fire can cause air pollution.

If there is firewood burning in rural homes, you should know that the kitchen wall will become very dark because of the long-term use of firewood, and the dust in the kitchen will also accumulate a thick layer. And the wall outside the chimney will also be blackened. These are because when firewood is burning, it will produce a lot of smoke and dust, and there will be a lot of microparticles in the smoke, which will have an impact on the surrounding environment.

On the other hand, when the gas is burning, the soot will not be so large, and there will not be so many microparticles, and many families in the city have range hoods to purify the soot. Don't say it's the city, do you always compare the city with the countryside, do you want to create contradictions and confrontations? There are also many families in the countryside that are burning gas, and if you look at your own village, the families that burn gas and the families that burn firewood, and look at their kitchens, you will know which one is more harmful to the surrounding environment.

Although firewood is harmful to the environment, because it is easy to obtain materials and has zero cost, it is also a very economical way for poor rural families. Although some experts say that burning firewood is polluting to the environment, in fact, the state has also taken into account the difficulties of farmers' lives, and they are not saying that firewood cannot be burned in rural areas, but only let those families with conditions try to choose less harmful to the environment, gas and natural gas.

To sum up, burning firewood is definitely more damaging to the surrounding environment than burning gas, don't always say that it has been burned for thousands of years, why is it said that there is pollution now? If you are willing to go back to the primitive era of traveling by horse-drawn carriages and feet, although no one will care about you, but the country is to develop, and the role of automobiles and other things in the modern society is greater, and it cannot be replaced, but firewood can be replaced. It's such a simple truth, but some people always can't figure it out.

Let me tell you quietly that those experts are right. It's just that it's themselves who are "right".

Electric vehicles are actually more harmful and polluting than cars.

Burning wood is actually more dangerous and polluting than factories.

People are more harmful than cats and dogs.

This type of news is something that everybody understands. Basically, the things that the "literary brutes" say are basically things that are related to the public, but have nothing to do with them. In response to the old saying, "Only the governor is allowed to set fires, and the people are not allowed to light lamps."

Propose a ban to win the attention of officials. One gets fame, two gets praise, and three gets wealth. Dolly's own business.

Get used to it. Things that benefit themselves and are not good for the people, these thoughts, they have done less. What's the use of what we say, no matter how much it makes sense.

By the way, send it to some eye-catching followers. Don't worry about the wrong operation of the elderly, the old man burns the fire all his life, the place where he should pay attention is more than us, don't use his own pig head to teach the elderly. It's great to read a book for a few years, but the old man's lifetime experience in firewood burning is not something that some children (guys) can understand.

A group of people who can't even light a fire are teaching the elderly to pay attention to firewood. I think I'm still worried about whether you will fall into the pit if you squat in the toilet by yourself.

What chest tightness chokes, respiratory hazards and so on. It's not that the house is stuffy. And there is one thing to consider, how did the firewood come from.

Let the young people of the present be a gas canister on the 5th floor, who will. But let the old man get firewood for a hundred meters, and they had a few more refusals. Why the health of the elderly is much better than that of the young is not clear enough?

Economical, and able to exercise, cooking and fragrant firewood, is banned, and only pigs in captivity at home come up with the idea.

I think this is very difficult for the current rural areas, because with the current infrastructure construction, the rural areas are not yet able to replace firewood for heating and cooking.

I don't know if you have seen some of the works of Internet celebrity Li Ziqi, in Li Ziqi's **, most of them are cooked through a wood stove, a brick stove is placed on top of a large cauldron, and the firewood is lit and placed below, and the delicious color and fragrance are complete, a strong rural atmosphere, which makes people feel the beauty of nature.

In fact, this way of cooking and heating is also used in most rural areas, they have no other fuel as a substitute, if one day you let the rural farmers stop burning firewood for cooking, then they have no other way to cook.

If you think that this way of burning fire will pollute the atmosphere, then you can provide them with a better choice, install natural gas for them, so that they can do without firewood, who doesn't know that firewood is tired for cooking, chopping firewood and collecting firewood, these are all manual, but if there is really another way, they will not choose this most primitive method.

The year before last, it was stipulated that the burning of straw in rural areas was prohibited, because burning straw is indeed polluting the environment, and most of the rural areas have done it, not to burn straw during spring plowing and autumn harvest, and now they are not even allowed to live and cook? That leaves the peasants at a loss, really.

Some experts say that cooking with firewood is a kind of pollution to the atmosphere, and that too much carbon dioxide can lead to poor air quality and even smog.

I can't help but ask a question here, if you say that burning fires will cause smog and affect the atmosphere, then how do you solve the problem of car exhaust? Isn't car exhaust in the city polluting the atmosphere? Aren't they the cause of the smog?

Is it just because the peasants are a vulnerable group that they should come to the top of the tank?

This kind of thing is still more congested, China has experienced thousands of years, firewood cooking has also followed for so long, but the air is not as bad as it is now, in fact, environmental protection can not only look at the smoke from the firewood, the main culprit is the smoke emitted by those chemical plants and a large number of car exhaust.

I think it's actually very right to not allow firewood to be burned in the countryside because if you want to burn firewood, you have to cut down trees, and that results in a lot of greenery.

I think I agree, because firewood burning releases a lot of carbon dioxide and is the main culprit of the greenhouse effect. Moreover, the nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur produced by burning firewood are harmful to the human body and produce haze.

Society is progressing, and the countryside should also be progressing, and if the infrastructure has been built very well, it is true that there should be no more firewood.

I support this practice, burning firewood pollutes the atmosphere, and we need to promote environmental protection.

Curling smoke, I hope to see that kind of scene at any time, there should be fireworks in the countryside.

Realistically speaking, burning firewood for cooking must consume wood, after all, is firewood burned? While burning firewood, more or less, it will definitely cause a certain amount of pollution to the environment.

However, this is only one side of the question.

There are two sides to everything, and it would be biased for experts to focus on only one aspect of the problem and not to do a comprehensive study.

You must know that in the countryside, cooking on the stove does not exist for a day or two, how many years of old traditions have been passed down by our ancestors, how can it be changed in one sentence?

Many rural people are accustomed to using their own earthen stoves, and then suddenly change to a firewood stove that has never been used or others are definitely not used to it. So, can the new firewood stove replace the traditional earthen stove in the countryside?

Personally, I think that according to the current trend, the firewood stove will eventually replace the traditional earthen firewood stove, after all, the firewood stove looks cleaner and more hygienic. And with the implementation of the national policy, more and more farmers will understand the national policy of "kitchen transformation".

However, in the hearts of farmers, the earthen firewood stove can never be replaced by the firewood stove. Why?

First, there is no difference between the earthen firewood stove and the new firewood stove, both are firewood, and the cooking should be almost the same, there is no need to replace the earthen firewood stove with the firewood stove;

Second, the earthen firewood stove is something that farmers have used for decades, and many farmers have this irreplaceable feeling for this thing, and burning the earthen firewood stove has become a habit, and it may not be changed for a while;

Third, why do farmers like earthen firewood stoves, is because the rice made by it is evenly heated, and the new firewood stoves have just emerged, will the cooked rice be the same as the earthen firewood stoves?

Fourth, it is relatively cheap to repair earthen firewood stoves, and farmers do not have much economic burden; However, the new firewood stove needs to buy a new stove, and it is said that the price is not low, which the farmers must not be willing to buy.

Personally, I think that the earthen firewood stove does not need to be changed to a firewood stove, although the earthen firewood stove does not look good, but some farmers take care of the earthen firewood stove very hygienic, and it is convenient to use. If you change it, it depends on the specific situation, and the more simple ones can be changed.

For thousands of years, burning firewood for cooking has become a living habit of rural people in rural areas. And habits are not easy to change, this is the real countryside, this is the real nostalgia. Moreover, the raw materials used in the earthen stove are straw, firewood, etc., and now the straw has been banned from burning, so that farmers can use it in the earthen stove to use the straw more reasonably, and there is no need to worry about the situation that the straw cannot be placed.

In recent years, China's air quality has really plummeted, and the air pollution is also serious.